Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):432-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318220db2c.
Although the power clean test is routinely used to assess strength and power performance in adult athletes, the reliability of this measure in younger populations has not been examined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the 1-repetition maximum (1RM) power clean in adolescent athletes. Thirty-six male athletes (age 15.9 ± 1.1 years, body mass 79.1 ± 20.3 kg, height 175.1 ±7.4 cm) who had >1 year of training experience in weightlifting exercises performed a 1RM power clean on 2 nonconsecutive days in the afternoon following standardized procedures. All test procedures were supervised by a senior level weightlifting coach and consisted of a systematic progression in test load until the maximum resistance that could be lifted for 1 repetition using proper exercise technique was determined. Data were analyzed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC[2,k]), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), repeated measures analysis of variance, Bland-Altman plot, and typical error analyses. Analysis of the data revealed that the test measures were highly reliable demonstrating a test-retest ICC of 0.98 (95% confidence interval = 0.96-0.99). Testing also demonstrated a strong relationship between 1RM measures in trials 1 and 2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.0001) with no significant difference in power clean performance between trials (70.6 ± 19.8 vs. 69.8 ± 19.8 kg). Bland-Altman plots confirmed no systematic shift in 1RM between trials 1 and 2. The typical error to be expected between 1RM power clean trials is 2.9 kg, and a change of at least 8.0 kg is indicated to determine a real change in lifting performance between tests in young lifters. No injuries occurred during the study period, and the testing protocol was well tolerated by all the subjects. These findings indicate that 1RM power clean testing has a high degree of reproducibility in trained male adolescent athletes when standardized testing procedures are followed and qualified instruction is present.
虽然在成人运动员中,功率清洁测试通常用于评估力量和功率表现,但在年轻人群中,这种测量方法的可靠性尚未得到检验。因此,本研究的目的是确定 1 次重复最大(1RM)功率清洁在青少年运动员中的可靠性。36 名男性运动员(年龄 15.9±1.1 岁,体重 79.1±20.3 千克,身高 175.1±7.4 厘米),他们有>1 年的举重练习经验,按照标准程序在下午的 2 个非连续日进行 1RM 功率清洁。所有测试程序均由一名高级举重教练监督,包括测试负荷的系统进展,直到使用适当的运动技术确定可以举起 1 次的最大阻力。使用组内相关系数(ICC[2,k])、皮尔逊相关系数(r)、重复测量方差分析、Bland-Altman 图和典型误差分析对数据进行了分析。数据分析显示,测试测量结果高度可靠,测试-重测 ICC 为 0.98(95%置信区间为 0.96-0.99)。测试还表明,第 1 次和第 2 次试验的 1RM 测量值之间存在很强的关系(r=0.98,p<0.0001),两次试验之间的功率清洁性能没有显著差异(70.6±19.8 与 69.8±19.8 千克)。Bland-Altman 图证实第 1 次和第 2 次试验之间 1RM 没有系统偏移。在 1RM 功率清洁试验之间预期的典型误差为 2.9 千克,并且需要至少 8.0 千克的变化来确定年轻举重运动员之间测试中提升性能的真正变化。在研究期间没有发生受伤事件,并且所有受试者都很好地耐受了测试方案。这些发现表明,当遵循标准化测试程序并提供合格的指导时,1RM 功率清洁测试在经过训练的男性青少年运动员中具有高度的可重复性。