Suppr超能文献

新手运动员最大重量深蹲和高翻动作表现的可靠性

Reliability of Maximal Back Squat and Power Clean Performances in Inexperienced Athletes.

作者信息

Comfort Paul, McMahon John J

机构信息

Human Performance Laboratory, Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29(11):3089-96. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000815.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine between-session reliability of maximal weight lifted during the back squat and power clean, in inexperienced athletes, and to identify the smallest detectable difference between sessions. Forty-four collegiate athletes (men: n = 32; age: 21.5 ± 2.0 years; height: 180.0 ± 6.1 cm; body mass: 81.01 ± 7.42 kg; women: n = 12; age: 21.0 ± 1.9 years; height: 169.0 ± 5.2 cm; body mass: 62.90 ± 7.46 kg) participated in this study. One repetition maximum (1RM) back squat and power cleans were each performed twice on separate days, 3-5 days apart. Paired samples' t tests revealed no significant differences between trial 1 and trial 2 of the power clean (70.55 ± 24.24 kg, 71.22 ± 23.87 kg, p > 0.05, power = 0.99) and the back squat (130.32 ± 34.05 kg, 129.82 ± 34.07 kg, p > 0.05, power = 1.0). No differences in reliability or measurement error were observed between men and women. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) demonstrated a high reliability (ICC = 0.997, p < 0.001) for between-session 1RM power clean with an R of 0.987; similarly, high reliability was observed for between-session back squat performances (ICC = 0.994, p < 0.001), with an R of 0.978. The smallest detectable difference between sessions for both measures were ∼5%, highlighting that coaches and researchers should look for a change of >5% to identify a meaningful change in both maximal back squat and power clean performance.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定缺乏经验的运动员在进行后深蹲和高翻时,两次训练课之间最大举重重量的可靠性,并确定两次训练课之间最小可检测差异。44名大学生运动员(男性:n = 32;年龄:21.5±2.0岁;身高:180.0±6.1厘米;体重:81.01±7.42千克;女性:n = 12;年龄:21.0±1.9岁;身高:169.0±5.2厘米;体重:62.90±7.46千克)参与了本研究。分别在相隔3 - 5天的不同日期进行一次重复最大值(1RM)后深蹲和高翻,各进行两次。配对样本t检验显示,高翻的第一次和第二次测试(70.55±24.24千克,71.22±23.87千克,p>0.05,检验效能 = 0.99)以及后深蹲(130.32±34.05千克,129.82±34.07千克,p>0.05,检验效能 = 1.0)之间无显著差异。未观察到男性和女性在可靠性或测量误差方面的差异。组内相关系数(ICC)显示,两次训练课之间1RM高翻的可靠性很高(ICC = 0.997,p<0.001),R为0.987;同样,两次训练课之间后深蹲表现的可靠性也很高(ICC = 0.994,p<0.001),R为0.978。两种测量方法在两次训练课之间的最小可检测差异约为5%,这表明教练和研究人员应寻找大于5%的变化,以确定最大后深蹲和高翻表现的有意义变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验