Miller Ross M, Happe Laura E, Meyer Kellie L, Spear Rachel J
Cerner LifeSciences, Beverly Hills, California, USA.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):54-62. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.1.54.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, disabling, and costly disease with several treatment options available; however, there is variability in evidence-based clinical guidelines. Therefore, payers are at a disadvantage when making management decisions without the benefit of definitive guidance from treatment guidelines.
To outline approaches for the management of agents used to treat MS, as determined from a group of U.S. managed care pharmacists and physicians.
A modified Delphi process was used to develop consensus statements regarding MS management approaches. The panel was composed of experts in managed care and included 8 pharmacy directors and 6 medical directors presently or previously involved in formulary decision making from 12 health plans, 1 specialty pharmacy, and 1 consulting company. These decision makers, who have experience designing health care benefits that include MS treatments, provided anonymous feedback through 2 rounds of web-based surveys and participated in 1 live panel meeting held in December 2010. Consensus was defined as a mean response of at least 3.3 or 100% of responses either "agree" or "strongly agree" (i.e., no panelist answered "disagree" or "strongly disagree") on a 4-item Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=agree, 4=strongly agree).
After 3 phases, these managed care representatives reached consensus on 25 statements for management of patients with MS. Consistent with managed care principles, this group of managed care experts found that health plans should consider efficacy, effectiveness, and safety, as well as patient preference, when evaluating MS therapies for formulary placement. Cost and contracting should be considered if efficacy and safety are judged to be comparable between agents.
The consensus statements developed by a panel of managed care representatives provide some insight into decision making in formulary and utilization management of MS therapies.
多发性硬化症(MS)是一种慢性、致残且费用高昂的疾病,有多种治疗方案可供选择;然而,循证临床指南存在差异。因此,在没有治疗指南明确指导的情况下,支付方在做出管理决策时处于劣势。
概述一组美国管理式医疗药剂师和医生确定的用于治疗MS的药物管理方法。
采用改良的德尔菲法制定关于MS管理方法的共识声明。该小组由管理式医疗专家组成,包括8名药房主任和6名医疗主任,他们目前或以前参与过12个健康计划、1家专科药房和1家咨询公司的处方集决策。这些决策者在设计包括MS治疗的医疗保健福利方面有经验,通过两轮基于网络的调查提供匿名反馈,并参加了2010年12月举行的1次现场小组会议。共识定义为在4级李克特量表(1 = 强烈不同意,2 = 不同意,3 = 同意,4 = 强烈同意)上至少3.3的平均回答或100%的回答为“同意”或“强烈同意”(即没有小组成员回答“不同意”或“强烈不同意”)。
经过3个阶段,这些管理式医疗代表就25条MS患者管理声明达成了共识。与管理式医疗原则一致,这组管理式医疗专家发现,健康计划在评估MS疗法以纳入处方集时应考虑疗效、有效性和安全性,以及患者偏好。如果判断药物之间的疗效和安全性相当,则应考虑成本和合同。
由一组管理式医疗代表制定的共识声明为MS疗法的处方集和使用管理决策提供了一些见解。