Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1791-800. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711003059. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
So far, no comprehensive answer has emerged to the question of whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can make a clinically useful contribution to the treatment of major depression. We aim to present a systematic review and meta-analysis of tDCS in the treatment of depression.
Medline and Embase were searched for open-label and randomized controlled trials of tDCS in depression using the expressions ('transcranial direct current stimulation' or 'tDCS') and ('depression' or 'depressed'). Study data were extracted with a standardized data sheet. For randomized controlled trials, effect size (Hedges' g) was calculated and the relationships between study variables and effect size explored using meta-regression.
A total of 108 citations were screened and 10 studies included in the systematic review. Six randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, with a cumulative sample of 96 active and 80 sham tDCS courses. Active tDCS was found to be more effective than sham tDCS for the reduction of depression severity (Hedges' g=0.743, 95% confidence interval 0.21-1.27), although study results differed more than expected by chance (Q=15.52, df=6, p=0.017, I2=61.35). Meta-regression did not reveal any significant correlations.
Our study was limited by the small number of studies included, which often had small sample size. Future studies should use larger, if possible representative, health service patient samples, and optimized protocols to evaluate the efficacy of tDCS in the treatment of depression further.
到目前为止,还没有一个全面的答案来回答经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是否可以对治疗重度抑郁症有临床意义的贡献。我们旨在对 tDCS 治疗抑郁症进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
使用“经颅直流电刺激”或“tDCS”和“抑郁”或“抑郁”的表达,在 Medline 和 Embase 上搜索 tDCS 治疗抑郁症的开放性和随机对照试验。使用标准化数据表提取研究数据。对于随机对照试验,计算效应大小(Hedges' g),并使用元回归探索研究变量与效应大小之间的关系。
共筛选出 108 条引文,系统评价纳入 10 项研究。荟萃分析纳入 6 项随机对照试验,共纳入 96 例活性 tDCS 和 80 例假 tDCS 疗程的累积样本。与假 tDCS 相比,活性 tDCS 更能有效降低抑郁严重程度(Hedges' g=0.743,95%置信区间 0.21-1.27),尽管研究结果比预期更不一致(Q=15.52,df=6,p=0.017,I2=61.35)。元回归未发现任何显著相关性。
我们的研究受到纳入研究数量少的限制,这些研究通常样本量较小。未来的研究应使用更大的、如果可能的代表性的、卫生服务患者样本,并优化方案,进一步评估 tDCS 治疗抑郁症的疗效。