Suppr超能文献

短音声爆发优于 click 刺激用于临床的颈前庭诱发肌源性电位。

Short tone bursts are better than clicks for cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in clinical practice.

机构信息

Otology & Neurotology Group CTS495, Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital de Poniente, Ctra de Almerimar, El Ejido, 04700 Almería, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jul;269(7):1857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1912-4. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

Abstract

Our aim is to compare short tone burst (STB)--and clicks--stimuli to evoke vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in healthy controls. A cross-sectional study in which VEMPs were measured in two sets of 185 and 55 normal volunteers by an air-conducted 500 Hz STBs and clicks, respectively. The test-retest reliability between different sessions was assessed in two subsets of 35 individuals. Moreover, 53 individuals were examined with both stimuli within the same session. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess reliability for P1 and N1 latencies, corrected amplitude and asymmetry ratio (AR). The results included that STBs produced a reliable response between different sessions (N = 35; [ICC] = 0.61-0.94, all p < 0.0001). Although clicks produced a reliable response for P1 and N1 latencies and corrected amplitudes (ICC = 0.62-0.74, all p < 0.0001), the amplitude ratio showed a lower reliability [ICC = 0.32 (-0.10 to 0.59)]. The amplitude of VEMP was consistently larger with 500 Hz STBs than clicks for a given sound pressure level. Within the same session, STBs evoked a response in 52/53 subjects (98%) whereas clicks evoked VEMPs only in 44/53 individuals (83%). Conclusions revealed that a 500 Hz STBs elicited consistently larger amplitudes, better reliability across recording sessions and fewer missing responses compared with click-induced VEMPs.

摘要

我们的目的是比较短音爆裂(STB)-和 click-刺激,以诱发健康对照组的前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMP)。这是一项横断面研究,其中通过空气传导的 500 Hz STB 和 click 分别测量了两组 185 名和 55 名正常志愿者的 VEMP。在两个子集的 35 个人中评估了不同测试之间的测试 - 重测可靠性。此外,53 个人在同一会议中同时接受了两种刺激的检查。使用内类相关系数(ICC)评估 P1 和 N1 潜伏期、校正幅度和不对称比(AR)的可靠性。结果表明,STB 在不同测试之间产生了可靠的反应(N = 35;[ICC] = 0.61-0.94,所有 p < 0.0001)。虽然 click 产生了可靠的 P1 和 N1 潜伏期和校正幅度反应(ICC = 0.62-0.74,所有 p < 0.0001),但幅度比显示出较低的可靠性[ICC = 0.32(-0.10 至 0.59)]。在给定的声压级下,VEMP 的幅度始终大于 500 Hz STB 的幅度。在同一会议中,STB 诱发了 52/53 名受试者中的反应(98%),而 click 仅诱发了 44/53 名个体中的 VEMP(83%)。结论表明,与 click 诱发的 VEMP 相比,500 Hz STB 诱发的幅度更大、可靠性更高、缺失反应更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验