Epidemiology Division, Institute of Tropical Medicine "Pedro Kouri," Havana City, Cuba.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012 Jul;12(7):609-15. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0690. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
To evaluate the results obtained though intersectoral coordination and community empowerment in one study carried out during 6 years in Playa Municipality, Cuba.
A longitudinal assessment comparing one intervention and one control area was conducted. The intervention encompasses two main stages separated by two dengue outbreaks. The first stage, focused on strengthening intersectoral coordination, was initiated in January 2000. In August 2003, a complementary strategy, focused on community empowerment and was initiated in half of the intervention area. In the control area, routine dengue control activities continued without additional input. We used entomologic surveillance data from January 1999 to December 2005 to assess the effectiveness. We computed the Breteau index (BI) per health area and the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the BIs at each time point. A semiparametric mixed model to capture the evolution in time of Aedes aegypti larval densities was fitted.
The BI in the control area showed the lowest value before starting the intervention. This was reversed 1 year after launching intersectoral activities for dengue control in the intervention area. In spite of spraying actions in all areas, the differences in BI between intervention and control areas remain significant until December 2002. Although for the next 2 years no differences were observed, they become significant again in December 2004, which corresponds with the implementation of the complementary community-based vector control strategy in the intervention area.
The model fitted identified monotonous trends over time and reversal trends at particular moments. The confidence bands indicate sections with significant differences between areas. Our data increase the evidence that the intersectoral coordination and community empowerment strategy for A. aegypti control is effective.
评估在古巴普拉亚市开展的一项为期 6 年的研究中,通过跨部门协调和社区赋权所取得的成果。
对干预区和对照区进行了一项纵向评估,比较了两者的结果。干预措施包括两个主要阶段,中间隔了两次登革热疫情。第一阶段专注于加强跨部门协调,于 2000 年 1 月启动。2003 年 8 月,在干预区的一半地区启动了一项补充策略,侧重于社区赋权。对照区继续开展常规的登革热控制活动,没有额外投入。我们使用 1999 年 1 月至 2005 年 12 月的昆虫学监测数据来评估效果。我们计算了每个卫生区域的布雷蒂厄指数(BI)和每个时间点 BI 差异的 95%置信区间。拟合了一个半参数混合模型来捕捉埃及伊蚊幼虫密度随时间的演变。
在开始干预之前,对照区的 BI 值最低。这一情况在干预区启动登革热跨部门控制活动 1 年后发生了逆转。尽管在所有地区都进行了喷洒行动,但干预区和对照区之间的 BI 差异在 2002 年 12 月之前仍然显著。尽管在接下来的 2 年中没有观察到差异,但在 2004 年 12 月再次变得显著,这与干预区实施补充性的基于社区的病媒控制策略相对应。
拟合的模型确定了随时间单调变化的趋势和特定时刻的反转趋势。置信带表示了区域之间存在显著差异的部分。我们的数据增加了证据表明,针对埃及伊蚊的跨部门协调和社区赋权控制策略是有效的。