The anglerfish deception. The light of proposed reform in the regulation of GM crops hides underlying problems in EU science and governance.
作者信息
Wickson Fern, Wynne Brian
机构信息
GenØk Centre for Biosafety, Tromsø, Norway.
出版信息
EMBO Rep. 2012 Feb 1;13(2):100-5. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.254.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The anglerfish deception. The light of proposed reform in the regulation of GM crops hides underlying problems in EU science and governance.
EMBO Rep. 2012 Feb 1;13(2):100-5. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.254.
2
Response to "The anglerfish deception".
EMBO Rep. 2012 Jun 1;13(6):481-2; author reply 482-3. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.70.
3
Commercializing genetically modified crops under EU regulations: objectives and barriers.
GM Crops Food. 2012 Jan-Mar;3(1):9-20. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.18961. Epub 2012 Jan 1.
4
Coexistence in the EU-return of the moratorium on GM crops?
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov;26(11):1223-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt1108-1223.
5
GM crop co-existence: a question of choice, not prejudice.
GM Crops Food. 2013 Jul-Dec;4(3):143-50. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.26303. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
6
The EU Court of Justice extends the GMO Directive to gene-edited organisms.
FEBS Lett. 2018 Nov;592(22):3653-3657. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13293.
7
GM crops-lessons from medicine.
Science. 2016 Sep 16;353(6305):1187. doi: 10.1126/science.aaj1764.
8
GM crop cultivation surges, but novel traits languish.
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Apr;29(4):302. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1842.
9
Opinion: EU biotech regulations stall agricultural improvements in developing countries.
Biotechnol J. 2007 Jun;2(6):670. doi: 10.1002/biot.200790065.
10
Scientists cry foul as Europe plays politics with GM crops.
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Feb;26(2):139-40. doi: 10.1038/nbt0208-139.
引用本文的文献
1
Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 29;19(4):e06574. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Managing value-laden judgements in regulatory science and risk assessment.
EFSA J. 2019 Jul 8;17(Suppl 1):e170709. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170709. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Towards inclusive social appraisal: risk, participation and democracy in governance of synthetic biology.
BMC Proc. 2018 Jul 19;12(Suppl 8):15. doi: 10.1186/s12919-018-0111-3. eCollection 2018.
4
New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):13-34. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2017.1289305.
5
Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.
Transgenic Res. 2014 Dec;23(6):933-43. doi: 10.1007/s11248-013-9754-z. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
6
The postmodern assault on science. If all truths are equal, who cares what science has to say?
EMBO Rep. 2012 Oct;13(10):885-9. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.130. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
7
Response to "The anglerfish deception".
EMBO Rep. 2012 Jun 1;13(6):481-2; author reply 482-3. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.70.
本文引用的文献
1
EU legitimizes GM crop exclusion zones.
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Apr;29(4):315-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1840.
2
Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs.
Sci Cult (Lond). 2001 Dec;10(4):445-81. doi: 10.1080/09505430120093586.
Zotero 插件