The postmodern assault on science. If all truths are equal, who cares what science has to say?
作者信息
Kuntz Marcel
机构信息
Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire Végétale, CNRS/Université Joseph Fourier/CEA/INRA, Grenoble, France.
出版信息
EMBO Rep. 2012 Oct;13(10):885-9. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.130. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The postmodern assault on science. If all truths are equal, who cares what science has to say?后现代主义对科学的攻击。如果所有真理都是平等的，谁会在乎科学怎么说呢？
EMBO Rep. 2012 Oct;13(10):885-9. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.130. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
2
Commentary to 'The postmodern assault on science' by Marcel Kuntz.对马塞尔·昆茨所著《后现代对科学的攻击》的评论
EMBO Rep. 2013 Feb;14(2):113-4. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.209. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
3
Why the postmodern attitude towards science should be denounced.为何后现代主义对科学的态度应受到谴责。
EMBO Rep. 2013 Feb;14(2):114-6. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.214. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
4
Evidence-based practice: a deconstruction and postmodern critique: book review article.循证实践：一种解构与后现代批判：书评文章
Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Mar;42(3):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.11.004.
5
[Postmodernism and the issue of nursing].[后现代主义与护理问题]
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2004 Jun;34(3):389-99. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2004.34.3.389.
6
7
Postmodernism for animal scientists.动物科学家的后现代主义
J Anim Sci. 2003 Dec;81(12):2989-94. doi: 10.2527/2003.81122989x.
8
Science and Postmodernism: From Right-Thinking to Soft-Despotism.科学与后现代主义：从思维正统到软性极权主义。
Trends Biotechnol. 2017 Apr;35(4):283-285. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
9
[Postmodernism and nursing knowledge development].[后现代主义与护理知识发展]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;55(4):73-80.
10
A service, rather than a threat, to the credibility of science.这是对科学可信度的一种助力，而非威胁。
EMBO Rep. 2013 Feb;14(2):112. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.206. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
引用本文的文献
1
How to distinguish a "scientoskeptic" from a "scientoenthusiast"? Psychometric properties and criteria for qualitative interpretation of the scores of the Views of Science Questionnaire in a Polish quota sample.如何区分“科学怀疑论者”和“科学狂热者”？波兰配额样本中科学观问卷得分的心理测量特性及定性解释标准。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2021 Mar 25;9(1):66-83. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2021.104596. eCollection 2021.
2
Anti-intellectualism amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The discursive elements and sources of anti-Fauci tweets.新冠疫情大流行期间的反智主义：反福奇推文的话语要素和来源。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jul;32(5):641-657. doi: 10.1177/09636625221146269. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
3
Psychoanalysis and Interdisciplinarity With Non-analytic Psychotherapeutic Approaches Through the Lens of Dialectics.从辩证法视角看精神分析与非分析性心理治疗方法的跨学科性
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 8;12:697506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697506. eCollection 2021.
4
Technological Risks (GMO, Gene Editing), What Is the Problem With Europe? A Broader Historical Perspective.技术风险（转基因生物、基因编辑），欧洲存在什么问题？更广阔的历史视角。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Nov 9;8:557115. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.557115. eCollection 2020.
5
Vaccine confidence: the keys to restoring trust.疫苗信心：恢复信任的关键。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 May 3;16(5):1007-1017. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1740559. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.旧规换新章：为欧盟作物生物技术确定新未来。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):13-34. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2017.1289305.
7
Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing: The use of genome editing technologies in plant breeding requires a novel regulatory approach for new plant varieties that involves farmers.编辑欧盟法规以适应植物基因组编辑：在植物育种中使用基因组编辑技术需要一种涉及农民的针对新植物品种的新型监管方法。
EMBO Rep. 2016 Oct;17(10):1365-1369. doi: 10.15252/embr.201643099. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
8
The GMO case in France: politics, lawlessness and postmodernism.法国的转基因生物案例：政治、违法与后现代主义
GM Crops Food. 2014 Jul 3;5(3):163-9. doi: 10.4161/21645698.2014.945882.
9
Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.推动就农业生物技术决策中的价值观展开更开放的辩论。
Transgenic Res. 2014 Dec;23(6):933-43. doi: 10.1007/s11248-013-9754-z. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
10
Society and GMOs--chicken and egg? The lessons from the GM crops debate in Europe over risk management and communication provide valuable pointers for the upcoming debate on GM animals.社会与转基因生物——先有鸡还是先有蛋？欧洲关于转基因作物风险管理与沟通的辩论所带来的经验教训，为即将到来的转基因动物辩论提供了宝贵的指导。
EMBO Rep. 2013 Aug;14(8):671-4. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.101. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
本文引用的文献
1
Destruction of public and governmental experiments of GMO in Europe.欧洲销毁转基因生物公共和政府实验。
GM Crops Food. 2012 Oct-Dec;3(4):258-64. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.21231. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
2
Stop worrying; start growing. Risk research on GM crops is a dead parrot: it is time to start reaping the benefits of GM.别再担忧了，开始行动起来。对转基因作物的风险研究就像一只死鹦鹉：是时候开始收获转基因带来的益处了。
EMBO Rep. 2012 Jun 1;13(6):493-7. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.59.
3
The anglerfish deception. The light of proposed reform in the regulation of GM crops hides underlying problems in EU science and governance.琵琶鱼的骗局。转基因作物监管方面拟议改革的表象掩盖了欧盟科学及治理体系中潜在的问题。
EMBO Rep. 2012 Feb 1;13(2):100-5. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.254.
4
"Interactive technology assessment" and beyond: the field trial of genetically modified grapevines at INRA-Colmar.“交互式技术评估”及其他：法国国家农业研究院科尔马分院转基因葡萄的田间试验
PLoS Biol. 2010 Nov 30;8(11):e1000551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000551.
Zotero 插件