The postmodern assault on science. If all truths are equal, who cares what science has to say?
作者信息
Kuntz Marcel
机构信息
Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire Végétale, CNRS/Université Joseph Fourier/CEA/INRA, Grenoble, France.
出版信息
EMBO Rep. 2012 Oct;13(10):885-9. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.130. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The postmodern assault on science. If all truths are equal, who cares what science has to say?
EMBO Rep. 2012 Oct;13(10):885-9. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.130. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
2
Commentary to 'The postmodern assault on science' by Marcel Kuntz.
EMBO Rep. 2013 Feb;14(2):113-4. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.209. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
3
Why the postmodern attitude towards science should be denounced.
EMBO Rep. 2013 Feb;14(2):114-6. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.214. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
4
Evidence-based practice: a deconstruction and postmodern critique: book review article.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Mar;42(3):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.11.004.
5
[Postmodernism and the issue of nursing].
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2004 Jun;34(3):389-99. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2004.34.3.389.
6
7
Postmodernism for animal scientists.
J Anim Sci. 2003 Dec;81(12):2989-94. doi: 10.2527/2003.81122989x.
8
Science and Postmodernism: From Right-Thinking to Soft-Despotism.
Trends Biotechnol. 2017 Apr;35(4):283-285. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
9
[Postmodernism and nursing knowledge development].
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;55(4):73-80.
10
A service, rather than a threat, to the credibility of science.
EMBO Rep. 2013 Feb;14(2):112. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.206. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
引用本文的文献
1
How to distinguish a "scientoskeptic" from a "scientoenthusiast"? Psychometric properties and criteria for qualitative interpretation of the scores of the Views of Science Questionnaire in a Polish quota sample.
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2021 Mar 25;9(1):66-83. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2021.104596. eCollection 2021.
2
Anti-intellectualism amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The discursive elements and sources of anti-Fauci tweets.
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jul;32(5):641-657. doi: 10.1177/09636625221146269. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
3
Psychoanalysis and Interdisciplinarity With Non-analytic Psychotherapeutic Approaches Through the Lens of Dialectics.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 8;12:697506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697506. eCollection 2021.
4
Technological Risks (GMO, Gene Editing), What Is the Problem With Europe? A Broader Historical Perspective.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Nov 9;8:557115. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.557115. eCollection 2020.
5
Vaccine confidence: the keys to restoring trust.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 May 3;16(5):1007-1017. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1740559. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):13-34. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2017.1289305.
7
Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing: The use of genome editing technologies in plant breeding requires a novel regulatory approach for new plant varieties that involves farmers.
EMBO Rep. 2016 Oct;17(10):1365-1369. doi: 10.15252/embr.201643099. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
8
The GMO case in France: politics, lawlessness and postmodernism.
GM Crops Food. 2014 Jul 3;5(3):163-9. doi: 10.4161/21645698.2014.945882.
9
Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.
Transgenic Res. 2014 Dec;23(6):933-43. doi: 10.1007/s11248-013-9754-z. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
10
Society and GMOs--chicken and egg? The lessons from the GM crops debate in Europe over risk management and communication provide valuable pointers for the upcoming debate on GM animals.
EMBO Rep. 2013 Aug;14(8):671-4. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.101. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
本文引用的文献
1
Destruction of public and governmental experiments of GMO in Europe.
GM Crops Food. 2012 Oct-Dec;3(4):258-64. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.21231. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
2
Stop worrying; start growing. Risk research on GM crops is a dead parrot: it is time to start reaping the benefits of GM.
EMBO Rep. 2012 Jun 1;13(6):493-7. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.59.
3
The anglerfish deception. The light of proposed reform in the regulation of GM crops hides underlying problems in EU science and governance.
EMBO Rep. 2012 Feb 1;13(2):100-5. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.254.
4
"Interactive technology assessment" and beyond: the field trial of genetically modified grapevines at INRA-Colmar.
PLoS Biol. 2010 Nov 30;8(11):e1000551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000551.
Zotero 插件