Functional Imaging Unit, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jun;35(6):1290-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23579. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
To investigate the within and between subject variability of quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements in normal subjects using various MRI techniques and positron emission tomography (PET).
Repeated CBF measurements were performed in 17 healthy, young subjects using three different MRI techniques: arterial spin labeling (ASL), dynamic contrast enhanced T1 weighted perfusion MRI (DCE) and phase contrast mapping (PCM). All MRI measurements were performed within the same session. In 10 of the subjects repeated CBF measurements by (15) O labeled water PET had recently been performed. A mixed linear model was used to estimate between subject (CV(betw)) and within subject (CV(with)) coefficients of variation.
Mean global CBF, CV(betw) and CV(with) using each of the four methods were for PCM 65.2 mL/100 g/min, 17.4% and 7.4%, for ASL 37.1 mL/100 g/min, 16.2% and 4.8%, for DCE 43.0 mL/100 g/min, 20.0%, 15.1% and for PET 41.9 mL/100 g/min, 16.5% and 11.9%, respectively. Only for DCE and PCM a significant positive correlation between measurements was demonstrated.
These findings confirm large between subject variability in CBF measurements, but suggest also that in healthy subjects a subject-method interaction is a possible source of between subject variability and of method differences.
使用各种 MRI 技术和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)研究正常受试者定量脑血流(CBF)测量的个体内和个体间变异性。
对 17 名健康年轻受试者使用三种不同的 MRI 技术(动脉自旋标记(ASL)、动态对比增强 T1 加权灌注 MRI(DCE)和相位对比映射(PCM))进行了重复 CBF 测量。所有 MRI 测量均在同一时段内进行。在 10 名受试者中,最近通过(15)O 标记水 PET 进行了重复 CBF 测量。使用混合线性模型来估计个体间(CV(betw))和个体内(CV(with))变异系数。
使用四种方法中的每一种方法测量的平均全局 CBF、CV(betw)和 CV(with)分别为 PCM 65.2 mL/100 g/min、17.4%和 7.4%,ASL 37.1 mL/100 g/min、16.2%和 4.8%,DCE 43.0 mL/100 g/min、20.0%、15.1%和 PET 41.9 mL/100 g/min、16.5%和 11.9%。仅在 DCE 和 PCM 中证明了测量之间存在显著正相关。
这些发现证实了 CBF 测量的个体间变异性较大,但也表明在健康受试者中,个体-方法相互作用可能是个体间变异性和方法差异的来源。