Suppr超能文献

利用 MRI 和正电子发射断层扫描估计脑血流测量的个体间变异性。

Estimation of intersubject variability of cerebral blood flow measurements using MRI and positron emission tomography.

机构信息

Functional Imaging Unit, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jun;35(6):1290-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23579. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the within and between subject variability of quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements in normal subjects using various MRI techniques and positron emission tomography (PET).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Repeated CBF measurements were performed in 17 healthy, young subjects using three different MRI techniques: arterial spin labeling (ASL), dynamic contrast enhanced T1 weighted perfusion MRI (DCE) and phase contrast mapping (PCM). All MRI measurements were performed within the same session. In 10 of the subjects repeated CBF measurements by (15) O labeled water PET had recently been performed. A mixed linear model was used to estimate between subject (CV(betw)) and within subject (CV(with)) coefficients of variation.

RESULTS

Mean global CBF, CV(betw) and CV(with) using each of the four methods were for PCM 65.2 mL/100 g/min, 17.4% and 7.4%, for ASL 37.1 mL/100 g/min, 16.2% and 4.8%, for DCE 43.0 mL/100 g/min, 20.0%, 15.1% and for PET 41.9 mL/100 g/min, 16.5% and 11.9%, respectively. Only for DCE and PCM a significant positive correlation between measurements was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

These findings confirm large between subject variability in CBF measurements, but suggest also that in healthy subjects a subject-method interaction is a possible source of between subject variability and of method differences.

摘要

目的

使用各种 MRI 技术和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)研究正常受试者定量脑血流(CBF)测量的个体内和个体间变异性。

材料和方法

对 17 名健康年轻受试者使用三种不同的 MRI 技术(动脉自旋标记(ASL)、动态对比增强 T1 加权灌注 MRI(DCE)和相位对比映射(PCM))进行了重复 CBF 测量。所有 MRI 测量均在同一时段内进行。在 10 名受试者中,最近通过(15)O 标记水 PET 进行了重复 CBF 测量。使用混合线性模型来估计个体间(CV(betw))和个体内(CV(with))变异系数。

结果

使用四种方法中的每一种方法测量的平均全局 CBF、CV(betw)和 CV(with)分别为 PCM 65.2 mL/100 g/min、17.4%和 7.4%,ASL 37.1 mL/100 g/min、16.2%和 4.8%,DCE 43.0 mL/100 g/min、20.0%、15.1%和 PET 41.9 mL/100 g/min、16.5%和 11.9%。仅在 DCE 和 PCM 中证明了测量之间存在显著正相关。

结论

这些发现证实了 CBF 测量的个体间变异性较大,但也表明在健康受试者中,个体-方法相互作用可能是个体间变异性和方法差异的来源。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验