• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users.在地方层面让患者参与 HTA 活动:基于研究人员与知识使用者合作的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 16;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-14.
2
Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level.在地方层面的卫生技术评估中引入患者视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Mar 27;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-54.
3
FRAMEWORK FOR USER INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: VIEWS OF HEALTH MANAGERS, USER REPRESENTATIVES, AND CLINICIANS.地方层面卫生技术评估中用户参与框架:卫生管理人员、用户代表及临床医生的观点
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(1-2):68-77. doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000070. Epub 2015 May 8.
4
Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocol.让患者参与卫生技术评估(HTA)的早期阶段:一项研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 20;14:273. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-273.
5
Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): the views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients.引入患者视角的医院卫生技术评估(HTA):HTA 生产者、医院管理者和患者的观点。
Health Expect. 2014 Dec;17(6):888-900. doi: 10.1111/hex.12010. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
6
Patients, users, caregivers, and citizens' involvement in local health technology assessment unit in Quebec: a survey.患者、用户、护理人员以及公民参与魁北克地区卫生技术评估机构:一项调查。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Sep 29;37:e5. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000707.
7
Evaluation of patient involvement in a health technology assessment.患者参与卫生技术评估的评价
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(3):166-70. doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000240. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
8
Evaluation of patient involvement strategies in health technology assessment in Spain: the viewpoint of HTA researchers.评价西班牙卫生技术评估中患者参与策略:HTA 研究人员的观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Sep 11;37:e25. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000586.
9
[Patient participation in the assessment of alternatives to restraint and seclusion].[患者参与约束和隔离替代措施的评估]
Sante Publique. 2014 Mar-Apr;26(2):217-26.
10
Knowledge mobilization in the context of health technology assessment: an exploratory case study.健康技术评估背景下的知识转化:一项探索性案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Apr 3;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Involving Patients in Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Medical Devices: Adapting to a Specific Local Context and Lessons Learned From the Assessment of an Ex Vivo Perfusion System of Human Donor Hearts.让患者参与基于医院的创新医疗设备卫生技术评估:适应特定的当地情况以及从人体供体心脏体外灌注系统评估中吸取的经验教训。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70119. doi: 10.1111/hex.70119.
2
Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.中东欧国家中患者参与健康技术评估的潜在障碍。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:922708. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922708. eCollection 2022.
3
Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.利益相关者参与经济评估:使用名义小组技术在嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的早期经济评估模型开发中征集患者、医疗保健提供者和卫生系统利益相关者意见的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e046707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046707.
4
Collaboration Between Researchers and Knowledge Users in Health Technology Assessment: A Qualitative Exploratory Study.研究者与卫生技术评估知识使用者合作:定性探索性研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Aug 1;6(8):437-446. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.153.
5
Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocol.让患者参与卫生技术评估(HTA)的早期阶段:一项研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 20;14:273. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-273.
6
Alternatives to seclusion and restraint in psychiatry and in long-term care facilities for the elderly: perspectives of service users and family members.精神病学和老年长期护理机构中隔离和约束的替代方法:服务使用者和家庭成员的观点。
Patient. 2013;6(4):269-80. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0023-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs.患者和公众参与临床实践指南:现有项目的知识综合。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):E45-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11424401. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
2
Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences.将患者和公众的观点引入健康技术评估:国际经验的系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jan;27(1):31-42. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310001315.
3
"It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies.“一切都取决于”:在卫生技术评估机构背景下对公众参与的概念化。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(10):1518-26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.036. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
4
Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level.在地方层面的卫生技术评估中引入患者视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Mar 27;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-54.
5
Identifying patient-relevant endpoints among individuals with schizophrenia: an application of patient-centered health technology assessment.在精神分裂症患者中识别与患者相关的终点:以患者为中心的健康技术评估的应用。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jan;25(1):35-41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090059.
6
Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment.为何伦理道德应成为卫生技术评估的一部分。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Fall;24(4):423-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080550.
7
Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury.让公众参与卫生技术评估的优先事项设定:公民陪审团的调查结果
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):282-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00501.x.
8
Barriers to patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation: an exploratory study.患者参与卫生服务规划与评估的障碍:一项探索性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Feb;70(2):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
9
The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM). Home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: cost-effectiveness and patient adherence.伯明翰康复利用率最大化研究(BRUM)。多民族人群中家庭心脏康复与医院心脏康复的比较:成本效益和患者依从性。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Sep;11(35):1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta11350.
10
Assessing genetic testing: who are the "lay experts"?
Health Policy. 2008 Jan;85(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

在地方层面让患者参与 HTA 活动:基于研究人员与知识使用者合作的研究方案。

Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users.

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, 10 rue de l'Espinay, D6-726, Quebec, QC G1L 3L5, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 16;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-14.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-12-14
PMID:22248231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3274445/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The literature recognizes a need for greater patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA), but few studies have been reported, especially at the local level. Following the decentralisation of HTA in Quebec, Canada, the last few years have seen the creation of HTA units in many Quebec university hospital centres. These units represent a unique opportunity for increased patient involvement in HTA at the local level. Our project will engage patients in an assessment being carried out by a local HTA team to assess alternatives to isolation and restraint for hospitalized or institutionalized adults. Our objectives are to: 1) validate a reference framework for exploring the relevance and applicability of various models of patient involvement in HTA, 2) implement strategies that involve patients (including close relatives and representatives) at different stages of the HTA process, 3) evaluate intervention processes, and 4) explore the impact of these interventions on a) the applicability and acceptability of recommendations arising from the assessment, b) patient satisfaction, and c) the sustainability of this approach in HTA.

METHODS

For Objective 1, we will conduct individual interviews with various stakeholders affected by the use of alternatives to isolation and restraint for hospitalized or institutionalized adults. For Objective 2, we will implement three specific strategies for patient involvement in HTA: a) direct participation in the HTA process, b) consultation of patients or their close relatives through data collection, and c) patient involvement in the dissemination of HTA results. For Objectives 3 and 4, we will evaluate the intervention processes and the impact of patient involvement strategies on the recommendations arising from the HTA and the understanding of the ethical and social implications of the HTA.

DISCUSSION

This project is likely to influence future HTA practices because it directly targets knowledge users' need for strategies that increase patient involvement in HTA. By documenting the processes and outcomes of these involvement strategies, the project will contribute to the knowledge base related to patient involvement in HTA.

摘要

背景

文献认识到需要让更多的患者参与健康技术评估(HTA),但很少有研究报告,特别是在地方一级。在加拿大魁北克的 HTA 去中心化之后,过去几年许多魁北克大学医院中心都设立了 HTA 部门。这些单位为在地方一级增加患者参与 HTA 提供了独特的机会。我们的项目将让患者参与当地 HTA 小组进行的评估,以评估替代隔离和约束的方法,适用于住院或住院的成年人。我们的目标是:1)验证一个参考框架,用于探索各种患者参与 HTA 的模式的相关性和适用性,2)实施在 HTA 过程的不同阶段涉及患者(包括近亲代表)的策略,3)评估干预过程,4)探讨这些干预措施对以下方面的影响:a)评估产生的建议的适用性和可接受性,b)患者满意度,c)HTA 中这种方法的可持续性。

方法

为了实现目标 1,我们将对受替代隔离和约束方法用于住院或住院的成年人的各种利益相关者进行个人访谈。为了实现目标 2,我们将实施三种具体的 HTA 患者参与策略:a)直接参与 HTA 过程,b)通过数据收集咨询患者或其近亲,c)患者参与 HTA 结果的传播。为了实现目标 3 和 4,我们将评估干预过程以及患者参与策略对 HTA 产生的建议以及对 HTA 的伦理和社会影响的理解的影响。

讨论

该项目可能会影响未来的 HTA 实践,因为它直接针对知识用户增加患者参与 HTA 的策略的需求。通过记录这些参与策略的过程和结果,该项目将为 HTA 患者参与的知识库做出贡献。