• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价西班牙卫生技术评估中患者参与策略:HTA 研究人员的观点。

Evaluation of patient involvement strategies in health technology assessment in Spain: the viewpoint of HTA researchers.

机构信息

Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (S/C Tenerife), Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (Galdakao), Servicio de Evaluación y Planificación, Dirección del Servicio Canario de la Salud, Camino Candelaria s/n. C.S. El Chorrillo, 38109, El Rosario, S/C Tenerife, Spain.

Unidad de Asesoramiento Científico-técnico, Avalia-t, Axencia de Coñecemento en Saúde (ACIS), Servizo Galego de Saúde, Santiago de Compostela (La Coruña), Spain.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Sep 11;37:e25. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000586.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462320000586
PMID:32914735
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Spanish Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS) defined a patient involvement (PI) framework for health technology assessment (HTA) activities in 2016. The aim of this study is to evaluate the process and impact of those PI initiatives that were implemented in the first year following the publication of this new framework.

METHODS

A survey was sent to those HTA researchers who implemented PI in RedETS projects. Responses were reviewed by two authors. An adapted thematic analysis was performed and the results were later discussed by all authors.

RESULTS

Six responses from six agencies/units were analyzed. The objectives of PI initiatives were the following: inclusion of patient perspectives, preferences and values; elicitation of important health outcomes measures; and barriers, facilitators, or suggestions for implementation. Different methods were used for PI: surveys, focus groups, in depth interviews, and participation in an expert panel. Five main themes emerged: (i) challenges with the recruitment process, (ii) needs identified, (iii) impact of PI, (iv) lessons learned, and (v) suggestions for the future.

CONCLUSIONS

PI initiatives within the RedETS framework were tailored to each HTA project, its specific goals and the individual needs and resources of each HTA agency. The results also pointed out how PI has a relevant impact that has enriched RedETS products providing key information on experiences, values, and preferences of patients, contributions that benefit the HTA and the process of drawing up recommendations. The main challenges were related to recruitment processes and capacity building.

摘要

目的

西班牙国家卫生系统技术和绩效评估机构网络(RedETS)于 2016 年为健康技术评估(HTA)活动定义了患者参与(PI)框架。本研究旨在评估在发布该新框架后的第一年中实施的那些 PI 计划的过程和影响。

方法

向在 RedETS 项目中实施 PI 的 HTA 研究人员发送了一份调查问卷。由两位作者对答复进行了审查。进行了适应性主题分析,然后由所有作者讨论结果。

结果

对来自六个机构/单位的六份答复进行了分析。PI 计划的目标如下:纳入患者的观点、偏好和价值观;确定重要的健康结果衡量标准;以及实施的障碍、促进因素或建议。采用了不同的方法进行 PI:调查、焦点小组、深入访谈和参与专家小组。出现了五个主要主题:(i)参与过程中的挑战,(ii)确定的需求,(iii)PI 的影响,(iv)经验教训,以及(v)未来的建议。

结论

RedETS 框架内的 PI 计划针对每个 HTA 项目、其特定目标以及每个 HTA 机构的个人需求和资源进行了定制。结果还指出了 PI 如何产生相关影响,丰富了 RedETS 产品,提供了患者的经验、价值观和偏好的关键信息,这些贡献有益于 HTA 和制定建议的过程。主要挑战与招聘流程和能力建设有关。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of patient involvement strategies in health technology assessment in Spain: the viewpoint of HTA researchers.评价西班牙卫生技术评估中患者参与策略:HTA 研究人员的观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Sep 11;37:e25. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000586.
2
Toward a Strategy to Involve Patients in Health Technology Assessment in Spain.迈向在西班牙让患者参与卫生技术评估的策略。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(2):92-98. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000096. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
3
Development of a decisional flowchart for meaningful patient involvement in Health Technology Assessment.制定决策流程图以实现患者在卫生技术评估中的有意义参与。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Dec 3;37:e3. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320001956.
4
The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS).西班牙国家卫生系统卫生技术评估和服务机构网络(RedETS)。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(3):176-180. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000205. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
5
[Requirements for and expectations of health technology assessment in Galicia (Spain). A qualitative study from the perspective of decision-makers and clinicians].[西班牙加利西亚地区卫生技术评估的要求与期望。一项从决策者和临床医生角度开展的定性研究]
Gac Sanit. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.05.014. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
6
The impact of the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, 2003-13: a multimethod evaluation.2003 - 2013年英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估项目的影响:多方法评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(67):1-291. doi: 10.3310/hta19670.
7
FRAMEWORK FOR USER INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: VIEWS OF HEALTH MANAGERS, USER REPRESENTATIVES, AND CLINICIANS.地方层面卫生技术评估中用户参与框架:卫生管理人员、用户代表及临床医生的观点
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(1-2):68-77. doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000070. Epub 2015 May 8.
8
Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users.在地方层面让患者参与 HTA 活动:基于研究人员与知识使用者合作的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 16;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-14.
9
Evaluation of the impact of patient involvement in health technology assessments: A scoping review.评价患者参与卫生技术评估的影响:范围综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):217-223. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000239. Epub 2020 May 8.
10
Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocol.让患者参与卫生技术评估(HTA)的早期阶段:一项研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 20;14:273. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-273.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder perspectives on the current status and potential barriers of patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) across Europe.欧洲利益相关者对患者参与卫生技术评估(HTA)的现状及潜在障碍的看法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Dec 19;40(1):e81. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004707.
2
The three-domain impact framework for characterizing impact of patient involvement in health technology assessment.三域影响框架用于描述患者参与卫生技术评估的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 11;40(1):e52. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000400.
3
Evaluating patient participation in value-based healthcare: Current state and lessons learned.
评估患者在基于价值的医疗保健中的参与度:现状和经验教训。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13945. doi: 10.1111/hex.13945.
4
A scoping review of the globally available tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts.全球可用的评估健康研究伙伴关系成果和影响的工具的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 22;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00958-y.
5
Using social media research in health technology assessment: stakeholder perspectives and scoping review.利用社交媒体进行卫生技术评估研究:利益相关者的观点和范围综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Sep 21;39(1):e63. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002593.
6
International overview of health technology assessment training tools and materials for patients and consumers.国际卫生技术评估培训工具和患者及消费者材料概览。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Sep 21;39(1):e61. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000533.