• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚假信念和动词非现实性是否共享相似的神经回路?

Do false belief and verb non-factivity share similar neural circuits?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2012 Feb 21;510(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.12.065. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.12.065
PMID:22249115
Abstract

The present study investigates whether the complement falsity elicited by strong non-factive verbs and the false belief activated by a standard nonverbal false belief task produce similar electrophysiological activities in the brain. The hypothesis is based on the notion that both complement falsity and false belief involve decoupling a false mental representation from reality. Some previous studies have reported a behavioral correlation between children's false belief reasoning and interpretation of strong non-factive verbs together with their false complements, but a neural basis for this correlation has not been found. Our event-related potential (ERP) results with normal adults showed that both nonverbal false belief and strong non-factive verb comprehension elicited a negative late slow waveform divergence compared to their respective baselines. Although these slow waves due to the two types of stimuli had slightly different scalp distributions, both were regarded as reflecting primarily frontal activation. Such ERP similarity provides evidence for a common neural basis shared by nonverbal false belief reasoning and comprehension of strong non-factive verbs.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨强非事实动词所引发的补语虚假和标准非言语虚假信念任务所激活的虚假信念是否会在大脑中产生类似的电生理活动。这一假设基于这样一种观点,即补语虚假和虚假信念都涉及将虚假的心理表征与现实分离。一些先前的研究报告了儿童虚假信念推理与强非事实动词及其虚假补语的解释之间的行为相关性,但尚未发现这种相关性的神经基础。我们对正常成年人的事件相关电位 (ERP) 结果显示,与各自的基线相比,非言语虚假信念和强非事实动词理解都会引起负晚慢波发散。尽管这两种类型的刺激产生的慢波在头皮分布上略有不同,但都被认为主要反映了额叶的激活。这种 ERP 相似性为非言语虚假信念推理和强非事实动词理解所共有的共同神经基础提供了证据。

相似文献

1
Do false belief and verb non-factivity share similar neural circuits?虚假信念和动词非现实性是否共享相似的神经回路?
Neurosci Lett. 2012 Feb 21;510(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.12.065. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
2
False belief and verb non-factivity: a common neural basis?虚假信念与动词非现实性:共同的神经基础?
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Mar;83(3):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
3
Relations between verb factivity and first-order and second-order false belief understanding: Evidence from Mandarin-speaking typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorders.动词事实性与一阶和二阶错误信念理解之间的关系:来自普通话发展正常的儿童和自闭症谱系障碍儿童的证据。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2020;34(1-2):185-200. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1628810. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
4
Electrophysiological evidence for the time-course of verifying text ideas.验证文本观点时间进程的电生理证据。
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):881-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
5
False belief reasoning in the brain: an ERP study.大脑中的错误信念推理:一项事件相关电位研究。
Sci China C Life Sci. 2008 Jan;51(1):72-9. doi: 10.1007/s11427-008-0014-z.
6
Relations between mental verb and false belief understanding in Cantonese-speaking children.粤语儿童心理动词与错误信念理解之间的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Oct;104(2):141-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
7
What we know about knowing: Presuppositions generated by factive verbs influence downstream neural processing.关于认知我们所知道的:事实动词产生的预设会影响下游的神经处理。
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
8
Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension.对冲突解决的情境敏感神经反应:来自语言理解中主宾歧义的电生理证据。
Brain Res. 2006 Jul 7;1098(1):139-52. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.080. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
9
Deception dissociates from false belief reasoning in deaf children: implications for the implicit versus explicit theory of mind distinction.欺骗与聋童的错误信念推理分离:对心理理论的内隐与外显区分的启示。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;30(Pt 1):188-209. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02072.x. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
10
Distinct neural correlates underlying pretense and false belief reasoning: evidence from ERPs.假装和错误信念推理的不同神经关联:来自 ERP 的证据。
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 1;63(2):623-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Comprehension of Cognitive Verbs Among Autistic Children.自闭症儿童对认知动词的理解
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06895-9.
2
The roles of language and executive function in Mandarin-speaking children's theory of mind development.语言与执行功能在说普通话儿童心理理论发展中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 12;15:1354207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1354207. eCollection 2024.
3
P300 as a correlate of false beliefs and false statements.P300 与虚假信念和虚假陈述相关。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3021. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3021. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
4
Relational vs representational social cognitive processing: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data.关系型与表象型社会认知加工:基于坐标的神经影像学数据分析的元分析。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Feb 28;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad003.
5
Electrophysiological dynamics of false belief understanding and complementation syntax in school-aged children: Oscillatory brain activity and event-related potentials.学龄儿童错误信念理解与补语句法的电生理动力学:脑振荡活动与事件相关电位
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Oct;198:104905. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104905. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Oscillatory brain activity differentially reflects false belief understanding and complementation syntax processing.振荡性脑活动差异反映错误信念理解和补语句法处理。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb;18(1):189-201. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0565-9.