• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

P300 与虚假信念和虚假陈述相关。

P300 as a correlate of false beliefs and false statements.

机构信息

Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences, The City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Early Childhood Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3021. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3021. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.3021
PMID:37073522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10275538/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates P300 as a component for false belief and false statement processing with and without a communicative context. The purpose is to understand why P300 has been shown to be commonly involved in false belief and lie processing.

METHODS

Participants were presented with a story in which the protagonist holds a true belief and makes a true statement of it (true belief), holds a false belief and makes a true statement (false belief), or holds a true belief and makes a false statement (false statement) while electroencephalograms were recorded.

RESULTS

In Experiment 1, featuring a solitary protagonist, stronger posterior P300 was shown in the false belief condition than the true belief and false statement condition. With the installation of a communicative context by including a second character listening to the protagonist, Experiment 2 showed enhanced frontal P300 in the false statement condition compared to the true belief and false belief condition. A late slow wave was more prominent in the false belief condition than in the other two conditions in Experiment 2.

CONCLUSION

The present results suggest a situation-dependent nature of P300. The signal captures the discrepancy between belief and reality more readily than that between belief and words under a noncommunicative context. It becomes more sensitive to the discrepancy between belief and words than that between belief and reality in a communicative situation with an audience, which makes any false statement practically a lie.

摘要

简介

本研究考察了 P300 在有和没有交际语境的情况下,对虚假信念和虚假陈述处理的作用。目的是理解为什么 P300 被证明普遍涉及虚假信念和谎言处理。

方法

参与者被呈现一个故事,其中主角持有真实的信念并做出真实的陈述(真实信念),持有虚假的信念并做出真实的陈述(虚假信念),或者持有真实的信念并做出虚假的陈述(虚假陈述),同时记录脑电图。

结果

在仅包含一个主角的实验 1 中,与真实信念和虚假陈述条件相比,虚假信念条件下的后 P300 更强。在包含一个倾听主角的第二个角色的交际语境下进行的实验 2 显示,与真实信念和虚假信念条件相比,虚假陈述条件下的额 P300 增强。与其他两个条件相比,实验 2 中的虚假信念条件下的晚期慢波更为明显。

结论

本研究结果表明 P300 具有情境依赖性。在非交际语境下,信号更容易捕捉到信念和现实之间的差异,而不是信念和言语之间的差异。在有听众的交际情境下,它对信念和言语之间的差异变得更加敏感,从而使任何虚假陈述实际上都是谎言。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735c/10275538/8932ec277b49/BRB3-13-e3021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735c/10275538/8b18d741b7cc/BRB3-13-e3021-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735c/10275538/9962de0d3233/BRB3-13-e3021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735c/10275538/85d86b663387/BRB3-13-e3021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735c/10275538/8932ec277b49/BRB3-13-e3021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735c/10275538/8b18d741b7cc/BRB3-13-e3021-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735c/10275538/9962de0d3233/BRB3-13-e3021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735c/10275538/85d86b663387/BRB3-13-e3021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735c/10275538/8932ec277b49/BRB3-13-e3021-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
P300 as a correlate of false beliefs and false statements.P300 与虚假信念和虚假陈述相关。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3021. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3021. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
Perceptual Access Reasoning (PAR) in Developing a Representational Theory of Mind.发展心理表象理论的知觉访问推理 (PAR)。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2021 Sep;86(3):7-154. doi: 10.1111/mono.12432.
3
True- and false-belief reasoning in children and adults: an event-related potential study of theory of mind.儿童和成人的真假信念推理:心理理论的事件相关电位研究。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;1(1):67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
4
The knowledge ("true belief") error in 4- to 6-year-old children: When are agents aware of what they have in view?4 至 6 岁儿童的“知识(“真信念”)错误”:什么时候主体能意识到他们所看到的东西?
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105255. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105255. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
5
Two sources of evidence on the non-automaticity of true and false belief ascription.关于真假信念归因的非自动性的两个证据来源。
Cognition. 2010 Apr;115(1):54-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.008. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
6
Belief and sign, true and false: the unique of false belief reasoning.信念与标志,真假:虚假信念推理的独特性。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Nov;231(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3661-7. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
7
Functional activity of the right temporo-parietal junction and of the medial prefrontal cortex associated with true and false belief reasoning.右侧颞顶联合区和内侧前额叶皮层的功能活动与真假信念推理有关。
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 15;60(3):1652-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.073. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
8
Processing of false belief passages during natural story comprehension: An fMRI study.自然故事理解过程中对错误信念段落的处理:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Nov;36(11):4231-46. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22907. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
[Theory of mind in Asperger syndrome].[阿斯伯格综合征中的心理理论]
Encephale. 2007 Sep;33(4 Pt 1):592-7. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(07)92058-8.
10
Oscillatory brain activity differentially reflects false belief understanding and complementation syntax processing.振荡性脑活动差异反映错误信念理解和补语句法处理。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb;18(1):189-201. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0565-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts.自我欺骗:模糊情境下的认知扭曲过程。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Feb 15;44(3):948-969. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26116. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
2
The Dynamic Differences between Self- and Other-Oriented Mental Inferences: An ERP Study on a False-Belief Task.自我和他人定向心理推理的动态差异:错误信念任务的 ERP 研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Oct;21(5):960-969. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00899-5. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Neural responses of in-group "favoritism" and out-group "discrimination" toward moral behaviors.
内群体“偏爱”和外群体“歧视”对道德行为的神经反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Mar 2;139:107375. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107375. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
A meta-analysis of the P3 amplitude in tasks requiring deception in legal and social contexts.在法律和社会背景下需要欺骗的任务中的 P3 振幅的荟萃分析。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Oct;135:103564. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
5
Detection of deception: Event-related potential markers of attention and cognitive control during intentional false responses.欺骗检测:故意虚假反应过程中注意力和认知控制的事件相关电位标记
Psychophysiology. 2018 Jun;55(6):e13047. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13047. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
The roles of liar intention, lie content, and theory of mind in children's evaluation of lies.说谎意图、谎言内容和心理理论在儿童对谎言的评价中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Apr;132:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
7
Belief and sign, true and false: the unique of false belief reasoning.信念与标志,真假:虚假信念推理的独特性。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Nov;231(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3661-7. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
8
Same or different? ERP correlates of pretense and false belief reasoning in children.相同还是不同?儿童假装和错误信念推理的事件相关电位关联
Neuroscience. 2013 Sep 17;248:488-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.06.017. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
9
Deafness, thought bubbles, and theory-of-mind development.耳聋、思维泡泡和心理理论发展。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Dec;49(12):2357-67. doi: 10.1037/a0032419. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
10
Two mentalizing capacities and the understanding of two types of lie telling in children.两种心理理论能力与儿童两种类型说谎行为的理解。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Sep;49(9):1650-9. doi: 10.1037/a0031128. Epub 2012 Dec 17.