Kuba K, Lippel K, Frantz I D
Clin Chem. 1979 Aug;25(8):1471-5.
Blood drawn from 192 probands and 1129 first-degree relatives who were participants in a collaborative family study of hyperlipoproteinemia at nine Lipid Research Clinics was used to prepare aliquots of whole plasma and top (d less than 1.006 g/mL) and bottom (d greater than 1.006 g/mL) ultracentrifugal fractions. Each aliquot was analyzed at a central laboratory by electrophoresis on paper, agarose, and polyacrylamide gel, and by a combined electrophoretic precipitation technique. The electrophoretograms were evaluated for the presence or absence of a "floating-beta" lipoprotein band. All four methods agreed completely for 92.3% of the samples. An additional 2.0% of the samples were in agreement for three electrophoretic methods, but the paper electrophoretic results were not interpretable. Another 1.9% were considered to be "floating-beta" positive by paper electrophoresis but negative by the other three electrophoretic methods.
从192名先证者和1129名一级亲属身上采集血液,这些人是在九个脂质研究诊所进行的高脂血症协作家庭研究的参与者。采集的血液用于制备全血浆以及顶部(密度小于1.006 g/mL)和底部(密度大于1.006 g/mL)超速离心分离组分的等分试样。每个等分试样在一个中央实验室通过在纸上、琼脂糖和聚丙烯酰胺凝胶上进行电泳,以及通过一种联合电泳沉淀技术进行分析。对电泳图谱评估是否存在“漂浮β”脂蛋白带。对于92.3%的样本,所有四种方法的结果完全一致。另外2.0%的样本在三种电泳方法上结果一致,但纸上电泳结果无法解读。另有1.9%的样本经纸上电泳判定为“漂浮β”阳性,但经其他三种电泳方法判定为阴性。