Hjelt Institute, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Feb;54(2):224-30. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318241ed42.
To examine whether gender composition of the occupation or the workplace is associated with sickness absence, whether the gender composition accounts for the observed female excess in sickness absence, and whether gender composition explains variation in sickness absence rates between occupations and workplaces.
Random effects models conducted among Helsinki employees (N = 36,395).
Women and men working in women-dominated occupations and workplaces had more short-term (1 to 3 days') sickness absence. Gender composition of the occupation and the workplace partly explained gender differences in short-term but not in intermediate (4 to 14 days') and long-term (>2 weeks') absence. Gender composition also explained variation in short-term sickness absence among occupations and workplaces, but this was partly accounted for by social class, income, and job contract type.
The results are consistent with the assumption that short-term sickness absence reflects cultures and norms shaping sickness absence behavior.
探讨职业或工作场所的性别构成是否与病假有关,性别构成是否解释了病假中观察到的女性过多的现象,以及性别构成是否解释了职业和工作场所之间病假率的差异。
在赫尔辛基员工中进行随机效应模型(N=36395)。
在女性主导的职业和工作场所工作的女性和男性,短期(1-3 天)病假更多。职业和工作场所的性别构成部分解释了短期但不解释中期(4-14 天)和长期(>2 周)缺勤的性别差异。性别构成也解释了职业和工作场所之间短期病假的差异,但这部分被社会阶层、收入和工作合同类型所解释。
这些结果与短期病假反映塑造病假行为的文化和规范的假设一致。