Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 41, Helsinki 00014, Finland.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Sep;64(9):802-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.093385. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
Low socioeconomic position is consistently associated with higher rates of sickness absence. We aimed to examine whether working conditions, health-related behaviours and family-related factors explain occupational class differences in medically certified sickness absence.
The study included 5470 women and 1464 men employees of the City of Helsinki, surveyed in 2000-2002. These data were prospectively linked to sickness absence records until the end of 2005, providing a mean follow-up time of 3.9 years. Poisson regression was used to examine the occurrence of medically certified sickness absence episodes lasting 4 days or more.
Medically certified sickness absence was roughly three times more common among manual workers than among managers and professionals in both women and men. Physical working conditions were the strongest explanatory factors for occupational class differences in sickness absence, followed by smoking and relative weight. Work arrangements and family-related factors had very small effects only. The effects of psychosocial working conditions were heterogeneous: job control narrowed occupational class differences in sickness absence while mental strain and job demands tended to widened them. Overall, the findings were quite similar in women and men.
Physical working conditions provided strongest explanations for occupational class differences in sickness absence. Smoking and relative weight, which are well-known determinants of health, also explained part of the excess sickness absence in lower occupational classes. Applying tailored work arrangements to employees on sick leave, reducing physically heavy working conditions and promoting healthy behaviours provide potential routes to narrow occupational class differences in sickness absence.
社会经济地位较低与较高的病假率相关。本研究旨在检验工作条件、与健康相关的行为和家庭因素是否可以解释职业类别差异与有医学证明的病假之间的关系。
该研究包括赫尔辛基市的 5470 名女性和 1464 名男性员工,于 2000-2002 年进行调查。这些数据前瞻性地与病假记录相关联,直到 2005 年底,平均随访时间为 3.9 年。使用泊松回归来检验持续 4 天或以上的有医学证明的病假发作的发生情况。
在女性和男性中,体力劳动者的有医学证明的病假缺勤率大约是管理人员和专业人员的三倍。物理工作条件是病假缺勤职业类别差异的最强解释因素,其次是吸烟和相对体重。工作安排和家庭相关因素的影响非常小。心理社会工作条件的影响具有异质性:工作控制缩小了病假缺勤的职业类别差异,而精神压力和工作需求则倾向于扩大这种差异。总的来说,女性和男性的结果非常相似。
物理工作条件为病假缺勤的职业类别差异提供了最强的解释。吸烟和相对体重是健康的已知决定因素,它们也解释了较低职业类别中过度病假缺勤的部分原因。为病假员工提供量身定制的工作安排、减少繁重的体力工作条件和促进健康行为,是缩小病假缺勤职业类别差异的潜在途径。