School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
J Neuropsychol. 2012 Sep;6(2):212-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-6653.2011.02023.x. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
Although serial administration of cognitive tests is increasingly common, there is a paucity of research on test-retest reliabilities and practice effects, both of which are important for evaluating changes in functioning. Reliability is generally conceptualized as involving short-lasting changes in performance. However, when repeated testing occurs over a period of years, there will be some longer lasting effects. The implications of these longer lasting effects and practice effects on reliability were examined in the context of repeated administrations of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III in 339 community-dwelling women aged 40-79 years over 2 to 7 years. The results showed that Logical Memory and Verbal Paired Associates subtests were consistently the most reliable subtests across the age cohorts. The magnitude of practice effects varied as a function of subtests and age. The largest practice effects were found in the youngest age cohort, especially on the Faces, Logical Memory, and Verbal Paired Associates subtests.
虽然连续进行认知测试越来越常见,但关于测试-重测信度和练习效应的研究却很少,这两者对于评估功能变化都很重要。信度通常被概念化为涉及到性能的短期变化。然而,当重复测试在数年的时间内进行时,就会有一些更持久的影响。在对 339 名年龄在 40-79 岁的社区女性进行的韦氏记忆量表 III 重复测试的背景下,研究了这些更持久的影响和练习效应对信度的影响。结果表明,逻辑记忆和言语配对联想子测验在所有年龄组中始终是最可靠的子测验。练习效应的大小因子测验和年龄而异。最小的年龄组中发现的练习效应最大,尤其是在面孔、逻辑记忆和言语配对联想子测验上。