Terrell D F, Thomas R K
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.
J Comp Psychol. 1990 Sep;104(3):238-47. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.3.238.
In Experiment 1, with the number of sides or angles of irregular polygons as cues, programmed training, and a 90% correct criterion (36 of 40), 2 squirrel monkeys' (Saimiri sciureus sciureus and S. boliviensus boliviensus) best performances were to discriminate heptagons from octagons, a 3rd's best was hexagons from heptagons, and a 4th's best was pentagons from heptagons. In Experiment 2, on most trials 2 polygons on one or both discriminanda had to be summed to determine which discrimination had the total fewer sides. Only 1 monkey met criterion (27 of 30) on the 2 tasks, 6 vs. 8 and 7 vs. 8 sides, but the other 3 performed better than chance on the 6 vs. 8 task. We conclude that previous studies of animals' discrimination of polygons in terms of complexity were minimally relevant to this work, and counting and subitizing were rejected in favor of a prototype-matching process to explain our monkeys' performances.
在实验1中,以不规则多边形的边数或角数为线索,采用程序化训练,设定90%的正确标准(40次中有36次正确),2只松鼠猴(松鼠猴指名亚种和松鼠猴玻利维亚亚种)的最佳表现是区分七边形和八边形,第三只猴子的最佳表现是区分六边形和七边形,第四只猴子的最佳表现是区分五边形和七边形。在实验2中,在大多数试验中,必须对一个或两个辨别刺激上的2个多边形的边数进行相加,以确定哪种辨别刺激的边数总和更少。只有1只猴子在6条边对8条边和7条边对8条边这两项任务中达到了标准(30次中有27次正确),但其他3只猴子在6条边对8条边的任务中表现优于随机水平。我们得出结论,之前关于动物根据复杂性辨别多边形的研究与本研究的相关性极小,并且我们摒弃了计数和瞬间识别,转而支持一种原型匹配过程来解释我们的猴子的表现。