de Blois S T, Novak M A, Bond M
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, USA.
J Comp Psychol. 1998 Jun;112(2):137-52. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.137.
The authors tested orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) on object permanence tasks. In Experiment 1, orangutans solved all visible displacements and most invisible displacements except those involving movements into 2 boxes successively. In Experiment 2, performance of orangutans on double invisible displacements and control displacements (assessing simple strategies) was compared. Orangutans did not use the simple strategy of selecting the box visited last by the experimenter. Instead, poorer performance on double invisible displacements may have been related to increased memory requirements. In Experiment 3, squirrel monkeys were tested using the procedure of Experiment 1. Squirrel monkeys solved visible but did not comprehend invisible displacements. Results suggest that orangutans but not squirrel monkeys possess Stage 6 object permanence capabilities.
作者对红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)和松鼠猴进行了客体永久性任务测试。在实验1中,红毛猩猩解决了所有可见位移问题以及除了那些涉及连续进入两个盒子的动作之外的大多数不可见位移问题。在实验2中,比较了红毛猩猩在双重不可见位移和控制位移(评估简单策略)上的表现。红毛猩猩没有使用选择实验者最后访问的盒子这种简单策略。相反,在双重不可见位移上表现较差可能与记忆需求增加有关。在实验3中,使用实验1的程序对松鼠猴进行了测试。松鼠猴解决了可见位移问题,但不理解不可见位移问题。结果表明,红毛猩猩具有第6阶段客体永久性能力,而松鼠猴则没有。