Gluud Lise Lotte, Klingenberg Sarah Louise, Langholz Ebbe
Department of InternalMedicine, Gentofte UniversityHospital, Hellerup,
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD006640. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006640.pub2.
Tranexamic acid reduces haemorrhage through its antifibrinolytic effects. In a previous version of the present review, we found that tranexamic acid may reduce mortality. The present review includes updated searches of randomised trials on tranexamic acid versus placebo, cimetidine or lansoprazole.
To assess the effects of tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Electronic searches (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index) and manual searches were combined. The last search update was in October 2011.
Trials in which patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomised to receive either tranexamic acid or placebo, or any anti-ulcer drug, were included.
Two authors independently extracted data. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome measure. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed and results presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup, sensitivity, regression and sequential analyses were performed to analyse sources of intertrial heterogeneity and the robustness of the overall result.
Seven double blind randomised trials on tranexamic acid versus placebo, cimetidine, or lanzoprazole were included. One trial offered endoscopic treatment to all patients that were randomised. Random-effects model meta-analysis found that tranexmic acid reduced mortality compared with placebo (41 of 829 versus 68 of 825 patients; RR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.89). The beneficial effect was not confirmed in subgroup analysis stratified for the quality of bias control, in worst case scenario analyses (in which 21% of the randomised patients were excluded), or in sequential analyses. No significant differences were found between tranexamic acid and placebo on bleeding, surgery, or transfusion requirements. No clear effects of tranexamic acid were identified in trials using endoscopic therapy or in the trials comparing tranexamic acid with cimetidine or lansoprazole. In the tranexamic acid group, five cases of serious thromboembolic events occurred (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and cerebral infarction). Overall, the number of patients with any thrombotic event was not significantly increased in the tranexamic acid group (RR 1.87, 95% CI 0.60 to 5.85).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Considering the internal and external validity of the evidence, tranexamic acid cannot be recommended for routine use. Additional trials in which tranexamic acid is used in combination with the currently recommended interventions are required.
氨甲环酸通过其抗纤维蛋白溶解作用减少出血。在本综述的上一版本中,我们发现氨甲环酸可能降低死亡率。本综述纳入了对氨甲环酸与安慰剂、西咪替丁或兰索拉唑对比的随机试验的更新检索。
评估氨甲环酸对上消化道出血的影响。
将电子检索(Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引)与手工检索相结合。最后一次检索更新时间为2011年10月。
纳入上消化道出血患者被随机分配接受氨甲环酸或安慰剂,或任何抗溃疡药物的试验。
两位作者独立提取数据。全因死亡率是主要结局指标。进行随机效应模型的荟萃分析,结果以相对风险(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)呈现。进行亚组分析、敏感性分析、回归分析和序贯分析,以分析试验间异质性的来源及总体结果的稳健性。
纳入了7项关于氨甲环酸与安慰剂、西咪替丁或兰索拉唑对比的双盲随机试验。一项试验对所有随机分组的患者均给予内镜治疗。随机效应模型荟萃分析发现,与安慰剂相比,氨甲环酸降低了死亡率(829例患者中有41例,825例患者中有68例;RR:0.61,95%CI 0.42至0.89)。在按偏倚控制质量分层的亚组分析、最坏情况分析(其中21%的随机分组患者被排除)或序贯分析中,该有益效果未得到证实。在出血、手术或输血需求方面,氨甲环酸与安慰剂之间未发现显著差异。在使用内镜治疗的试验中,或在比较氨甲环酸与西咪替丁或兰索拉唑的试验中,未发现氨甲环酸有明确效果。在氨甲环酸组中,发生了5例严重血栓栓塞事件(心肌梗死、肺栓塞和脑梗死)。总体而言,氨甲环酸组中发生任何血栓事件的患者数量未显著增加(RR 1.87,95%CI 0.60至5.85)。
考虑到证据的内部和外部有效性,不推荐常规使用氨甲环酸。需要进行额外的试验,将氨甲环酸与目前推荐的干预措施联合使用。