• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.促进结直肠癌筛查的干预措施:综合评价。
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):172-181.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
2
Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.结肠镜检查外展与粪便免疫化学检测外展对结直肠癌筛查完成率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):806-815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11389.
3
Evidence for colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查的证据。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005.
4
Community Health workers United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease among people at Higher risk (CHURCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.社区卫生工作者联合起来降低高危人群的结直肠癌和心血管疾病风险(CHURCH):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2024 Apr 26;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08110-z.
5
Interventions Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latino Men: A Systematic Review.促进拉丁裔男性结直肠癌筛查的干预措施:系统评价。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Mar 8;15:E31. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170218.
6
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Populations: Evidence Summary.结直肠癌筛查在一般风险人群中的应用:证据总结。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:2878149. doi: 10.1155/2016/2878149. Epub 2016 Aug 14.
7
Design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to colorectal cancer screening among patients cared for in a community health center.一项随机对照试验的设计,旨在评估一种多方面干预措施在社区卫生中心接受治疗的患者中提高结直肠癌筛查依从性方面的比较效果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 29;13:153. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-153.
8
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.筛查结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查和其他策略的比较效果和成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
9
Program to improve colorectal cancer screening in a low-income, racially diverse population: a randomized controlled trial.提高低收入、种族多样化人群结直肠癌筛查率的项目:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;10(5):412-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.1381.
10
Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.患者邮件宣传促进结直肠癌筛查的成本效益。
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6):553-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbd8eb.

引用本文的文献

1
Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.美国结直肠癌治疗全程中的黑人和白人差异。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41575-025-01087-3.
2
Online Interest in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Florida.佛罗里达州对结直肠癌筛查的在线关注度。
South Med J. 2025 Jul;118(7):365-369. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001846.
3
Factors Associated with Attending to the Colorectal Cancer Screening Services among at-Risk Individuals in a Community Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study.社区护理医院中高危个体接受结直肠癌筛查服务的相关因素:一项横断面分析研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Jun 1;26(6):2163-2173. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.6.2163.
4
Breast Cancer Screening Participation and Internet Search Activity in a Japanese Population: Decade-Long Time-Series Study.日本人群中乳腺癌筛查参与情况与网络搜索活动:长达十年的时间序列研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 4;11:e64020. doi: 10.2196/64020.
5
Effectiveness of a tailored communication intervention on colonoscopy uptake for firstdegree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial.针对结直肠癌患者一级亲属的结肠镜检查接受率的定制化沟通干预措施的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Apr 20;9(9):100068. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.04.007. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Adaptation of a Community Health Advisor Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among African Americans in the Southern United States.调整社区健康顾问干预措施以提高美国南部非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查率
Cancer Health Disparities. 2021;5.
7
Patients' Willingness to Share Limited Endoscopic Resources: A Brief Report on the Results of a Large Regional Survey.患者分享有限内镜资源的意愿:一项大型区域调查结果的简要报告
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Sep 28;6(2):23814683211045648. doi: 10.1177/23814683211045648. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
8
Promoting colorectal cancer screening: A scoping review of screening interventions and resources.促进结直肠癌筛查:筛查干预措施和资源的范围综述。
Prev Med. 2021 Jun;147:106517. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106517. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
Hereditary colorectal cancer screening: A 10-year longitudinal cohort study following an educational intervention.遗传性结直肠癌筛查:一项教育干预后的10年纵向队列研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 23;20:101189. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101189. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Barriers and facilitators for colorectal cancer screening in a low-income urban community in Mexico City.墨西哥城低收入城市社区中结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Jul 10;1:64. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00055-z. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.系统评价:提高结直肠癌筛查的使用和质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):668-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00239. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
2
The value of theory for enhancing and understanding e-health interventions.理论对于加强和理解电子健康干预措施的价值。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.035.
3
Theorizing social context: rethinking behavioral theory.理论化社会语境:重新思考行为理论。
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):55S-70S. doi: 10.1177/1090198109335338.
4
The 2009-2013 research agenda for oncology nursing.2009 - 2013年肿瘤护理研究议程。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Sep;36(5):E274-82. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.E274-E282.
5
The role of primary care physicians in cancer care.初级保健医生在癌症护理中的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(9):1029-36. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1058-x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
6
Cancer statistics, 2009.2009年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. Epub 2009 May 27.
7
Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.《2008年结直肠癌和腺瘤性息肉早期检测的筛查与监测:美国癌症协会、美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组及美国放射学会联合指南》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 May-Jun;58(3):130-60. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0018. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
8
Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.克服初次结肠镜检查预约时的低就诊率:同伴指导或宣传册支持的随机试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23(1):58-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0445-4. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
9
A critical review of theory in breast cancer screening promotion across cultures.对跨文化乳腺癌筛查推广理论的批判性综述。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:351-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.143420.
10
A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.一项关于针对性和个性化干预对结直肠癌筛查影响的随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):2083-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23022.

促进结直肠癌筛查的干预措施:综合评价。

Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):172-181.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003
PMID:22261002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3366042/
Abstract

Behavior change interventions to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have targeted people in community and primary care settings, health care providers, and health systems. Randomized controlled trials provide the strongest evidence of intervention efficacy. The purpose of this integrative review was to evaluate trials of CRC screening interventions published between 1997 and 2007 and to identify knowledge gaps and future directions for research. Thirty-three randomized trials that met inclusion criteria were evaluated using a modified version of the TREND criteria. Significant intervention effects were reported in 6 of 10 trials focused on increasing fecal occult blood testing, 4 of 7 trials focused on sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy completion, and 9 of 16 trials focused on completion of any screening test. Several effective interventions to promote CRC screening were identified. Future trials need to use theory to guide interventions, examine moderators and mediators, consistently report results, and use comparable outcome measures.

摘要

行为改变干预措施旨在促进结直肠癌(CRC)筛查,其目标人群包括社区和初级保健环境中的人群、医疗保健提供者以及卫生系统。随机对照试验为干预效果提供了最强有力的证据。本综合评价的目的是评估 1997 年至 2007 年间发表的 CRC 筛查干预试验,并确定研究的知识空白和未来方向。使用 TREND 标准的修改版本评估了符合纳入标准的 33 项随机试验。在 10 项旨在增加粪便潜血检测的试验中有 6 项、在 7 项旨在完成乙状结肠镜或结肠镜检查的试验中有 4 项以及在 16 项旨在完成任何筛查试验的试验中有 9 项报告了显著的干预效果。确定了一些有效的促进 CRC 筛查的干预措施。未来的试验需要使用理论来指导干预措施,检验调节因素和中介因素,始终如一地报告结果,并使用可比的结果测量。