Suppr超能文献

促进结直肠癌筛查的干预措施:综合评价。

Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):172-181.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

Abstract

Behavior change interventions to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have targeted people in community and primary care settings, health care providers, and health systems. Randomized controlled trials provide the strongest evidence of intervention efficacy. The purpose of this integrative review was to evaluate trials of CRC screening interventions published between 1997 and 2007 and to identify knowledge gaps and future directions for research. Thirty-three randomized trials that met inclusion criteria were evaluated using a modified version of the TREND criteria. Significant intervention effects were reported in 6 of 10 trials focused on increasing fecal occult blood testing, 4 of 7 trials focused on sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy completion, and 9 of 16 trials focused on completion of any screening test. Several effective interventions to promote CRC screening were identified. Future trials need to use theory to guide interventions, examine moderators and mediators, consistently report results, and use comparable outcome measures.

摘要

行为改变干预措施旨在促进结直肠癌(CRC)筛查,其目标人群包括社区和初级保健环境中的人群、医疗保健提供者以及卫生系统。随机对照试验为干预效果提供了最强有力的证据。本综合评价的目的是评估 1997 年至 2007 年间发表的 CRC 筛查干预试验,并确定研究的知识空白和未来方向。使用 TREND 标准的修改版本评估了符合纳入标准的 33 项随机试验。在 10 项旨在增加粪便潜血检测的试验中有 6 项、在 7 项旨在完成乙状结肠镜或结肠镜检查的试验中有 4 项以及在 16 项旨在完成任何筛查试验的试验中有 9 项报告了显著的干预效果。确定了一些有效的促进 CRC 筛查的干预措施。未来的试验需要使用理论来指导干预措施,检验调节因素和中介因素,始终如一地报告结果,并使用可比的结果测量。

相似文献

1
Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.促进结直肠癌筛查的干预措施:综合评价。
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):172-181.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
3
Evidence for colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查的证据。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.系统评价:提高结直肠癌筛查的使用和质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):668-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00239. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
3
Theorizing social context: rethinking behavioral theory.理论化社会语境:重新思考行为理论。
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):55S-70S. doi: 10.1177/1090198109335338.
4
The 2009-2013 research agenda for oncology nursing.2009 - 2013年肿瘤护理研究议程。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Sep;36(5):E274-82. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.E274-E282.
5
The role of primary care physicians in cancer care.初级保健医生在癌症护理中的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(9):1029-36. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1058-x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
6
Cancer statistics, 2009.2009年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. Epub 2009 May 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验