Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):172-181.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
Behavior change interventions to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have targeted people in community and primary care settings, health care providers, and health systems. Randomized controlled trials provide the strongest evidence of intervention efficacy. The purpose of this integrative review was to evaluate trials of CRC screening interventions published between 1997 and 2007 and to identify knowledge gaps and future directions for research. Thirty-three randomized trials that met inclusion criteria were evaluated using a modified version of the TREND criteria. Significant intervention effects were reported in 6 of 10 trials focused on increasing fecal occult blood testing, 4 of 7 trials focused on sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy completion, and 9 of 16 trials focused on completion of any screening test. Several effective interventions to promote CRC screening were identified. Future trials need to use theory to guide interventions, examine moderators and mediators, consistently report results, and use comparable outcome measures.
行为改变干预措施旨在促进结直肠癌(CRC)筛查,其目标人群包括社区和初级保健环境中的人群、医疗保健提供者以及卫生系统。随机对照试验为干预效果提供了最强有力的证据。本综合评价的目的是评估 1997 年至 2007 年间发表的 CRC 筛查干预试验,并确定研究的知识空白和未来方向。使用 TREND 标准的修改版本评估了符合纳入标准的 33 项随机试验。在 10 项旨在增加粪便潜血检测的试验中有 6 项、在 7 项旨在完成乙状结肠镜或结肠镜检查的试验中有 4 项以及在 16 项旨在完成任何筛查试验的试验中有 9 项报告了显著的干预效果。确定了一些有效的促进 CRC 筛查的干预措施。未来的试验需要使用理论来指导干预措施,检验调节因素和中介因素,始终如一地报告结果,并使用可比的结果测量。