Suppr超能文献

促进结直肠癌筛查的干预措施:综合评价。

Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):172-181.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

Abstract

Behavior change interventions to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have targeted people in community and primary care settings, health care providers, and health systems. Randomized controlled trials provide the strongest evidence of intervention efficacy. The purpose of this integrative review was to evaluate trials of CRC screening interventions published between 1997 and 2007 and to identify knowledge gaps and future directions for research. Thirty-three randomized trials that met inclusion criteria were evaluated using a modified version of the TREND criteria. Significant intervention effects were reported in 6 of 10 trials focused on increasing fecal occult blood testing, 4 of 7 trials focused on sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy completion, and 9 of 16 trials focused on completion of any screening test. Several effective interventions to promote CRC screening were identified. Future trials need to use theory to guide interventions, examine moderators and mediators, consistently report results, and use comparable outcome measures.

摘要

行为改变干预措施旨在促进结直肠癌(CRC)筛查,其目标人群包括社区和初级保健环境中的人群、医疗保健提供者以及卫生系统。随机对照试验为干预效果提供了最强有力的证据。本综合评价的目的是评估 1997 年至 2007 年间发表的 CRC 筛查干预试验,并确定研究的知识空白和未来方向。使用 TREND 标准的修改版本评估了符合纳入标准的 33 项随机试验。在 10 项旨在增加粪便潜血检测的试验中有 6 项、在 7 项旨在完成乙状结肠镜或结肠镜检查的试验中有 4 项以及在 16 项旨在完成任何筛查试验的试验中有 9 项报告了显著的干预效果。确定了一些有效的促进 CRC 筛查的干预措施。未来的试验需要使用理论来指导干预措施,检验调节因素和中介因素,始终如一地报告结果,并使用可比的结果测量。

相似文献

1
Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):172-181.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
3
Evidence for colorectal cancer screening.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005.
5
Interventions Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latino Men: A Systematic Review.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Mar 8;15:E31. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170218.
6
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Populations: Evidence Summary.
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:2878149. doi: 10.1155/2016/2878149. Epub 2016 Aug 14.
8
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
10
Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6):553-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbd8eb.

引用本文的文献

1
Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41575-025-01087-3.
2
Online Interest in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Florida.
South Med J. 2025 Jul;118(7):365-369. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001846.
7
Patients' Willingness to Share Limited Endoscopic Resources: A Brief Report on the Results of a Large Regional Survey.
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Sep 28;6(2):23814683211045648. doi: 10.1177/23814683211045648. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
8
Promoting colorectal cancer screening: A scoping review of screening interventions and resources.
Prev Med. 2021 Jun;147:106517. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106517. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
Hereditary colorectal cancer screening: A 10-year longitudinal cohort study following an educational intervention.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 23;20:101189. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101189. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Barriers and facilitators for colorectal cancer screening in a low-income urban community in Mexico City.
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Jul 10;1:64. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00055-z. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):668-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00239. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
2
The value of theory for enhancing and understanding e-health interventions.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.035.
3
Theorizing social context: rethinking behavioral theory.
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):55S-70S. doi: 10.1177/1090198109335338.
4
The 2009-2013 research agenda for oncology nursing.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Sep;36(5):E274-82. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.E274-E282.
5
The role of primary care physicians in cancer care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(9):1029-36. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1058-x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
6
Cancer statistics, 2009.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. Epub 2009 May 27.
8
Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23(1):58-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0445-4. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
9
A critical review of theory in breast cancer screening promotion across cultures.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:351-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.143420.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验