Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anal Chem. 2012 Mar 20;84(6):2670-7. doi: 10.1021/ac202733q. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
The evident importance of metabolic profiling for biomarker discovery and hypothesis generation has led to interest in incorporating this technique into large-scale studies, e.g., clinical and molecular phenotyping studies. Nevertheless, these lengthy studies mandate the use of analytical methods with proven reproducibility. An integrated experimental plan for LC-MS profiling of urine, involving sample sequence design and postacquisition correction routines, has been developed. This plan is based on the optimization of the frequency of analyzing identical quality control (QC) specimen injections and using the QC intensities of each metabolite feature to construct a correction trace for all the samples. The QC-based methods were tested against other current correction practices, such as total intensity normalization. The evaluation was based on the reproducibility obtained from technical replicates of 46 samples and showed the feature-based signal correction (FBSC) methods to be superior to other methods, resulting in ~1000 and 600 metabolite features with coefficient of variation (CV) < 15% within and between two blocks, respectively. Additionally, the required frequency of QC sample injection was investigated and the best signal correction results were achieved with at least one QC injection every 2 h of urine sample injections (n = 10). Higher rates of QC injections (1 QC/h) resulted in slightly better correction but at the expense of longer total analysis time.
代谢物分析在生物标志物发现和假设生成方面的重要性不言而喻,这促使人们将该技术纳入大规模研究中,例如临床和分子表型研究。然而,这些冗长的研究需要使用具有可重复性的分析方法。本研究提出了一种尿液 LC-MS 分析的综合实验方案,包括样本序列设计和采集后校正程序。该方案基于优化分析相同质量控制(QC)标本注射的频率以及利用每个代谢物特征的 QC 强度为所有样本构建校正轨迹。将基于 QC 的方法与其他当前的校正实践(如总强度归一化)进行了比较。评估基于 46 个样本的技术重复获得的重现性,结果表明基于特征的信号校正(FBSC)方法优于其他方法,在两个样本块内和之间,CV<15%的代谢物特征分别约有 1000 和 600 个。此外,还研究了 QC 样本注射的最佳频率,结果表明至少每 2 小时注射一次 QC 样本(n=10)可获得最佳的信号校正效果。更高的 QC 注射频率(1 QC/h)可实现稍好的校正效果,但会延长总分析时间。