Suppr超能文献

调整世界医学教育联合会的标准以用于眼科护理培训项目的自我评估。

Adapting the World Federation for Medical Education standards for use in a self-audit of an eye care training programme.

作者信息

Tousignant B, Du Toit R

机构信息

Fred Hollows Foundation, Newmarket, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011 Dec;24(3):641. Epub 2011 Dec 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2006, a Postgraduate Diploma in Eye Care (PGDEC) for mid-level health personnel was initiated in Papua New Guinea, in partnership with The Fred Hollows Foundation New Zealand, the local government and Divine Word University. In the absence of national accreditation and with limited resources, an interim evaluation was needed.

METHODS

We adapted the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) standards to use in a self-audit to evaluate nine areas and 38 subareas of programme structure, processes and implementation. We developed a rating system: each area and subarea was scored for partial or complete attainment of basic or quality development levels. Ratings were referenced with supporting documents. Data were gathered internally, through document census and meetings between stakeholders.

FINDINGS

A qualitative and quantitative portrait emerged: all nine programme areas completely attained at least basic level and two completely attained the quality development level. Twenty-six (68%) subareas completely attained the quality development level. Key successes included the administration of the PGDEC, synergies between the partnership's stakeholders and its relationship with the public health system.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

This self-audit adapted from WFME standards provided a simple, yet systematic and largely objective evaluation. It proved beneficial to further develop the programme, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.

摘要

引言

2006年,巴布亚新几内亚与新西兰弗雷德·霍洛基金会、当地政府及神圣之言大学合作,为中级卫生人员开设了眼保健研究生文凭课程(PGDEC)。由于缺乏国家认证且资源有限,需要进行一次中期评估。

方法

我们采用了世界医学教育联合会(WFME)的标准,用于自我审核,以评估该项目结构、流程和实施的九个领域及38个子领域。我们制定了一个评分系统:对每个领域和子领域在部分或完全达到基本或质量发展水平方面进行评分。评分参考了相关支持文件。数据通过内部文档普查以及利益相关者之间的会议收集。

结果

呈现出一幅定性和定量的图景:所有九个项目领域至少完全达到了基本水平,两个领域完全达到了质量发展水平。26个(68%)子领域完全达到了质量发展水平。主要成功之处包括PGDEC的管理、合作伙伴关系中各利益相关者之间的协同作用以及它与公共卫生系统的关系。

讨论与结论

这次根据WFME标准进行的自我审核提供了一个简单但系统且基本客观的评估。事实证明,这对进一步发展该项目很有帮助,突出了优势和需要改进的领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验