Suppr超能文献

一项关于点阵激光治疗和磨皮术治疗瘢痕的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of fractional laser therapy and dermabrasion for scar resurfacing.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2012 Apr;38(4):595-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02283.x. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dermabrasion has been the standard resurfacing procedure for postsurgical scars, but recovery can be long. Fractionated carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser is a safe, effective tissue resurfacing modality, but no prospective trial has compared its safety or efficacy with that of dermabrasion for postsurgical scar resurfacing.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of single-treatment fractional photothermolysis with that of single-treatment dermabrasion for postsurgical scar resurfacing on the face.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A split-scar method was used to compare fractionated CO2 laser and diamond fraise dermabrasion on postsurgical scars of the face. Primary endpoint was safety at day 0, 1 week, and 1 month. Secondary endpoint was efficacy at 3 months as measured by blinded evaluation of standardized photographs.

RESULTS

Safety data revealed that there was less erythema (p = .001) and bleeding (p = .001) at day 0, less erythema (p = .01) and edema (p = .046) at 1 week, and a trend toward less erythema at 1 month (p = .06) with fractionated CO2 . Efficacy data at 3 months revealed equivalent scar improvements (p = .77).

CONCLUSION

Fractionated CO2 laser therapy should be considered a safe alternative for surgical scar resurfacing on the face. The safety profile exceeds that of dermabrasion, and it has a quicker clinical recovery and equivalent cosmetic efficacy.

摘要

背景

磨皮术一直是外科手术后瘢痕修复的标准方法,但恢复时间较长。 分 化 二 氧 化 碳 (CO2) 激光是一种安全有效的组织表面重建方式,但尚无前瞻性试验比较其安全性或疗效与磨皮术用于外科手术后瘢痕表面重建的疗效。

目的

比较单次分 化 光 热 疗 法 和单次磨皮术治疗面部外科手术后瘢痕的安全性和疗效。

方法和材料

采用分割瘢痕的方法比较分 化 CO2 激光和钻石 Fraise 磨皮术治疗面部外科手术后的瘢痕。主要终点是治疗后 0、1 周和 1 个月时的安全性。次要终点是 3 个月时通过盲法评估标准化照片来衡量的疗效。

结果

安全性数据显示,分 化 CO2 在治疗后 0 天、1 周和 1 个月时的红斑(p =.001)和出血(p =.001)较少,1 周时红斑(p =.01)和水肿(p =.046)较少,1 个月时红斑趋势减少(p =.06);而磨皮术则没有显著差异。3 个月时的疗效数据显示,瘢痕改善程度相当(p =.77)。

结论

分 化 CO2 激光治疗可被视为面部外科手术后瘢痕表面重建的安全替代方法。其安全性优于磨皮术,临床恢复更快,美容效果相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验