Movement Science Group, School of Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Mar 30;205(1):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
Walking models driven by centre of mass (CoM) data obtained from inertial measurement units (IMU) or optical motion capture systems (OMCS) can be used to objectively measure gait. However current models have only been validated within typical developed adults (TDA). The purpose of this study was to compare the projected CoM movement within Parkinson's disease (PD) measured by an IMU with data collected from an OMCS after which spatio-temporal gait measures were derived using an inverted pendulum model. The inter-rater reliability of spatio-temporal parameters was explored between expert researchers and clinicians using the IMU processed data. Participants walked 10 m with an IMU attached over their centre of mass which was simultaneously recorded by an OMCS. Data was collected on two occasions, each by an expert researcher and clinician. Ten people with PD showed no difference (p=0.13) for vertical, translatory acceleration, velocity and relative position of the projected centre of mass between IMU and OMCS data. Furthermore no difference (p=0.18) was found for the derived step time, stride length and walking speed for people with PD. Measurements of step time (p=0.299), stride length (p=0.883) and walking speed (p=0.751) did not differ between experts and clinicians. There was good inter-rater reliability for these parameters (ICC3.1=0.979, ICC3.1=0.958 and ICC3.1=0.978, respectively). The findings are encouraging and support the use of IMUs by clinicians to measure CoM movement in people with PD.
基于惯性测量单元 (IMU) 或光学运动捕捉系统 (OMCS) 获取的质心 (CoM) 数据驱动的步行模型可用于客观测量步态。然而,目前的模型仅在典型的发育成熟的成年人 (TDA) 中得到验证。本研究的目的是比较 PD 患者的 CoM 运动,这些运动通过 IMU 进行测量,与 OMCS 收集的数据进行比较,然后使用倒立摆模型得出时空步态测量结果。研究人员使用 IMU 处理后的数据,探讨了专家研究人员和临床医生之间时空参数的组内相关系数 (ICC)。参与者在中心质量上附着一个 IMU 以 10m 的速度行走,该 IMU 同时被 OMCS 记录。数据分两次采集,每次由一名专家研究人员和一名临床医生采集。10 名 PD 患者的 IMU 和 OMCS 数据的 CoM 垂直、平移加速度、速度和相对位置没有差异 (p=0.13)。此外,PD 患者的步时、步长和步行速度的推导值没有差异 (p=0.18)。步时 (p=0.299)、步长 (p=0.883) 和步行速度 (p=0.751) 的测量值在专家和临床医生之间没有差异。这些参数的组内相关系数 (ICC3.1=0.979、ICC3.1=0.958 和 ICC3.1=0.978) 具有良好的可靠性。研究结果令人鼓舞,支持临床医生使用 IMU 测量 PD 患者的 CoM 运动。