Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine and the VA Medical Center, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Blood Purif. 2012;33(1-3):160-4. doi: 10.1159/000334159. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
After initial reports suggesting that patients initiating peritoneal dialysis (PD) had better survival than patients on conventional dialysis in the first year, many investigators have scrutinized the existing databases to determine the reasons for this apparent difference. It is clear that patients starting on PD are selected - they are younger and have less comorbidity compared to the general population on dialysis. Despite improvements in the morbidities of patients on PD over the past 15 years, the survival of patients on hemodialysis over 5 years is greater than for patients on hemodialysis. The latest analysis points to the considerable survival difference in patients who start dialysis with an arteriovenous fistula or graft compared to patients who start dialysis with a cuffed catheter. Thus, the apparent early survival advantage for patients starting PD can be attributed to selection and comorbidities. Data are emerging that the best survival occurs when patients are dialyzed more frequently than the conventional three times a week. The questions regarding dialysis modality now can shift from whether to encourage PD to how to encourage frequent hemodialysis.
最初的报告表明,开始腹膜透析 (PD) 的患者在第一年的生存率优于常规透析患者,许多研究人员仔细检查了现有数据库,以确定这种明显差异的原因。很明显,开始进行 PD 的患者是经过选择的 - 与透析患者相比,他们更年轻,合并症更少。尽管过去 15 年来 PD 患者的发病率有所改善,但 5 年以上血液透析患者的生存率高于血液透析患者。最新分析指出,与使用带袖口的导管开始透析的患者相比,使用动静脉瘘或移植物开始透析的患者的生存率存在显著差异。因此,开始 PD 的患者早期生存优势明显可以归因于选择和合并症。有数据表明,当患者的透析频率高于每周三次的常规透析时,生存情况最佳。现在关于透析方式的问题可以从是否鼓励 PD 转变为如何鼓励频繁的血液透析。