Suppr超能文献

椎体增强术后骨水泥周围“晕圈”现象的重要性是什么?

What is the importance of "halo" phenomenon around bone cement following vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic compression fracture?

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 712 Eongu-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-720, Korea.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2012 Oct;23(10):2559-65. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1896-y. Epub 2012 Jan 21.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We investigated the importance, risk factors, and clinical course of the radiolucent "halo" phenomenon around bone cement following vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic compression fracture. Preoperative osteonecrosis and a lump cement pattern were the most important risk factors for the peri-cement halo phenomenon, and it was associated with vertebral recollapse.

INTRODUCTION

We observed a newly developed radiolucent area around the bone cement following vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic compression fractures. Here, we describe the importance of the peri-cement halo phenomenon, as well as any associated risk factors and long-term sequelae.

METHODS

In total, 175 patients (202 treated vertebrae) were enrolled in this study. The treated vertebrae were subdivided into two groups: Group A (with halo, n = 32) and Group B (without halo, n = 170), and the groups were compared with respect to multiple preoperative (age, sex, BMD, preoperative osteonecrosis) and perioperative factors (operative approach: vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty; cement distribution pattern; cement leakage; cement volume), and postoperative results (VAS score, recollapse). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the incidence of the peri-cement halo and all of the parameters described above.

RESULTS

Rates of osteonecrosis were also significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (62.5% vs. 31.2%, p < 0.05), and kyphoplasty (KP) was performed more frequently in Group A (43.8% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.05). Lump cement (93.8% vs. 30.6%, p < 0.05) and recollapse (78.1% vs. 24.7%, p < 0.05) were also more common among individuals in Group A. Logistic regression analysis also showed that preoperative osteonecrosis (OR = 3.679; 95% CI = 1.677-8.073; p = 0.001), KP (OR = 3.630; 95% CI = 1.628-8.095; p = 0.002), lump pattern (OR = 13.870; 95% CI = 2.907-66.188; p = 0.001), and vertebral recollapse (OR = 5.356; 95% CI = 1.897-15.122; p = 0.002) were significantly associated with peri-cement halo.

CONCLUSIONS

The peri-cement halo was found to be associated with vertebral recollapse, this sign likely represents a poor prognostic factor after vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic compression fractures.

摘要

目的

探讨骨质疏松性压缩性骨折椎体强化术后骨水泥周围放射性透亮“晕圈”现象的重要性、危险因素及临床病程。术前骨坏死和块状水泥分布模式是骨水泥周围晕圈现象最重要的危险因素,与椎体再塌陷有关。

方法

共纳入 175 例(202 个治疗椎体)患者进行本研究。将治疗椎体分为两组:A 组(有晕圈,n=32)和 B 组(无晕圈,n=170),比较两组患者的多个术前(年龄、性别、BMD、术前骨坏死)和围手术期因素(手术入路:椎体成形术或后凸成形术;水泥分布模式;水泥渗漏;水泥体积)以及术后结果(VAS 评分、再塌陷)。采用 logistic 回归分析评估骨水泥周围晕圈的发生率与上述所有参数之间的关系。

结果

A 组的骨坏死发生率也明显高于 B 组(62.5%比 31.2%,p<0.05),A 组更常采用后凸成形术(KP)(43.8%比 17.6%,p<0.05)。块状水泥(93.8%比 30.6%,p<0.05)和再塌陷(78.1%比 24.7%,p<0.05)在 A 组中也更为常见。logistic 回归分析还显示,术前骨坏死(OR=3.679;95%CI=1.677-8.073;p=0.001)、KP(OR=3.630;95%CI=1.628-8.095;p=0.002)、块状模式(OR=13.870;95%CI=2.907-66.188;p=0.001)和椎体再塌陷(OR=5.356;95%CI=1.897-15.122;p=0.002)与骨水泥周围晕圈显著相关。

结论

骨水泥周围晕圈与椎体再塌陷有关,这一征象可能代表骨质疏松性压缩性骨折椎体强化术后的预后不良因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验