• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Eurocan plus report: feasibility study for coordination of national cancer research activities.欧洲癌症加项目报告:国家癌症研究活动协调的可行性研究
Ecancermedicalscience. 2008;2:84. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2011.84. Epub 2008 May 20.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
4
Anniversary Oncology Days in Paris.巴黎周年肿瘤日。
Exp Oncol. 2023 Dec 28;45(3):273-274.
5
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
Improvement of European translational cancer research. Collaboration between comprehensive cancer centers.欧洲转化癌症研究的改进。综合癌症中心之间的合作。
Tumori. 2008 Mar-Apr;94(2):143-6. doi: 10.1177/030089160809400202.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
[A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].[关于法国及欧盟心理学家培训改革的一项提议]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
10
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Safeguarding cancer research funding by European charities amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间保护欧洲慈善机构的癌症研究资金
Mol Oncol. 2020 Dec;14(12):2987-2993. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12839. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
2
Excellent translational research in oncology: A journey towards novel and more effective anti-cancer therapies.肿瘤学领域卓越的转化研究:通往新型且更有效抗癌疗法的征程。
Mol Oncol. 2016 May;10(5):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
3
Emphasising the European Union's Commitment to Cancer Research: a helicopter view of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development.强调欧盟对癌症研究的承诺:第七个研究与技术发展框架计划的俯瞰图。
Oncologist. 2012;17(10):e26-32. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0327.
4
The role of funding and policies on innovation in cancer drug development.资金与政策在癌症药物研发创新中的作用。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2010;4:164. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2010.164. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Policy challenges for cancer research: a call to arms.癌症研究面临的政策挑战:战斗的号角
Ecancermedicalscience. 2007;1:53. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2008.53. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
2
The EU clinical trials directive: 3 years on.欧盟临床试验指令:实施三年后。
Lancet. 2007 May 26;369(9575):1777-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60797-1.
3
Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006.2006年欧洲癌症发病率和死亡率的估计数据。
Ann Oncol. 2007 Mar;18(3):581-92. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl498. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
4
The impact of the 'Clinical Trials' directive on the cost and conduct of non-commercial cancer trials in the UK.“临床试验”指令对英国非商业性癌症试验成本及开展情况的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jan;43(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.09.016. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
5
Striking the right balance between privacy and public good.
Lancet. 2006 Jan 28;367(9507):275. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68043-4.
6
Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use.欧洲议会和理事会2001年4月4日关于协调各成员国有关在人用药品临床试验实施中适用良好临床实践的法律、法规及行政规定的第2001/20/EC号指令。
Med Etika Bioet. 2002 Spring-Summer;9(1-2):12-9.
7
Effect of Estonian law on prospects for public health research.爱沙尼亚法律对公共卫生研究前景的影响。
Lancet. 2003 Dec 20;362(9401):2122. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15127-6.
8
Measuring progress against cancer in Europe: has the 15% decline targeted for 2000 come about?衡量欧洲抗癌进展:2000年设定的15%降幅目标实现了吗?
Ann Oncol. 2003 Aug;14(8):1312-25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg353.
9
European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003).《欧洲抗癌法典》及其科学依据:第三版(2003年)
Ann Oncol. 2003 Jul;14(7):973-1005. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg305.
10
Confidentiality and the public interest in medical research--will we ever get it right?医学研究中的保密性与公共利益——我们能做对吗?
Clin Med (Lond). 2003 May-Jun;3(3):219-28. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-3-219.

欧洲癌症加项目报告:国家癌症研究活动协调的可行性研究

Eurocan plus report: feasibility study for coordination of national cancer research activities.

出版信息

Ecancermedicalscience. 2008;2:84. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2011.84. Epub 2008 May 20.

DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2011.84
PMID:22274749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3234055/
Abstract

The EUROCAN+PLUS Project, called for by the European Parliament, was launched in October 2005 as a feasibility study for coordination of national cancer research activities in Europe. Over the course of the next two years, the Project process organized over 60 large meetings and countless smaller meetings that gathered in total over a thousand people, the largest Europe-wide consultation ever conducted in the field of cancer research.Despite a strong tradition in biomedical science in Europe, fragmentation and lack of sustainability remain formidable challenges for implementing innovative cancer research and cancer care improvement. There is an enormous duplication of research effort in the Member States, which wastes time, wastes money and severely limits the total intellectual concentration on the wide cancer problem. There is a striking lack of communication between some of the biggest actors on the European scene, and there are palpable tensions between funders and those researchers seeking funds.It is essential to include the patients' voice in the establishment of priority areas in cancer research at the present time. The necessity to have dialogue between funders and scientists to establish the best mechanisms to meet the needs of the entire community is evident. A top priority should be the development of translational research (in its widest form), leading to the development of effective and innovative cancer treatments and preventive strategies. Translational research ranges from bench-to-bedside innovative cancer therapies and extends to include bringing about changes in population behaviours when a risk factor is established.The EUROCAN+PLUS Project recommends the creation of a small, permanent and independent European Cancer Initiative (ECI). This should be a model structure and was widely supported at both General Assemblies of the project. The ECI should assume responsibility for stimulating innovative cancer research and facilitating processes, becoming the common voice of the cancer research community and serving as an interface between the cancer research community and European citizens, patients' organizations, European institutions, Member States, industry and small and medium enterprises (SMEs), putting into practice solutions aimed at alleviating barriers to collaboration and coordination of cancer research activities in the European Union, and dealing with legal and regulatory issues. The development of an effective ECI will require time, but this entity should be established immediately. As an initial step, coordination efforts should be directed towards the creation of a platform on translational research that could encompass (1) coordination between basic, clinical and epidemiological research; (2) formal agreements of co-operation between comprehensive cancer centres and basic research laboratories throughout Europe and (3) networking between funding bodies at the European level.The European Parliament and its instruments have had a major influence in cancer control in Europe, notably in tobacco control and in the implementation of effective population-based screening. To make further progress there is a need for novelty and innovation in cancer research and prevention in Europe, and having a platform such as the ECI, where those involved in all aspects of cancer research can meet, discuss and interact, is a decisive development for Europe.

摘要

欧洲议会倡导的“EUROCAN+PLUS项目”于2005年10月启动,作为一项协调欧洲各国癌症研究活动的可行性研究。在接下来的两年里,该项目组织了60多次大型会议和无数次小型会议,总共召集了一千多人,这是癌症研究领域有史以来规模最大的全欧洲范围的磋商。尽管欧洲在生物医学科学方面有着悠久的传统,但碎片化和缺乏可持续性仍然是实施创新性癌症研究和改善癌症护理的巨大挑战。成员国的研究工作存在大量重复,这既浪费时间又浪费金钱,还严重限制了对广泛癌症问题的总体智力投入。欧洲一些最大的行为主体之间明显缺乏沟通,资助者与寻求资金的研究人员之间也存在明显的紧张关系。

目前,在确定癌症研究的优先领域时,必须纳入患者的声音。资助者和科学家之间进行对话以建立满足整个群体需求的最佳机制的必要性是显而易见的。首要任务应该是开展转化研究(以最广泛的形式),从而开发出有效且创新的癌症治疗方法和预防策略。转化研究涵盖从实验室到临床的创新性癌症治疗方法,还包括在确定风险因素时促使人群行为发生改变。

“EUROCAN+PLUS项目”建议设立一个小型、常设且独立的欧洲癌症倡议组织(ECI)。这应该是一个典范性的架构,在该项目的两次大会上都得到了广泛支持。ECI应负责推动创新性癌症研究并促进相关进程,成为癌症研究界的共同声音,并作为癌症研究界与欧洲公民、患者组织、欧洲机构、成员国、行业以及中小企业之间的接口,将旨在消除欧盟癌症研究活动合作与协调障碍的解决方案付诸实践,并处理法律和监管问题。建立一个有效的ECI需要时间,但这个实体应立即设立。作为第一步,协调工作应致力于创建一个转化研究平台,该平台可以涵盖:(1)基础研究、临床研究和流行病学研究之间的协调;(2)欧洲各地综合癌症中心与基础研究实验室之间的正式合作协议;(3)欧洲层面资助机构之间的网络建设。

欧洲议会及其相关手段在欧洲的癌症控制方面发挥了重大影响,尤其是在烟草控制和实施有效的人群筛查方面。为了取得进一步进展,欧洲的癌症研究和预防需要新颖性和创新性,而拥有一个像ECI这样能让参与癌症研究各个方面的人员汇聚一堂、进行讨论和互动的平台,对欧洲来说是一个决定性的发展。