Sullivan R
Chairman, European Cancer Research Managers Forum and Director, Clinical Centres Cancer Research UK.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2007;1:53. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2008.53. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
Research has delivered remarkable benefits for cancer patients and their families since James Watson and Francis Crick wrote the now immortal line, 'We wish to propose a structure for the salt of deoxyribonucleic acid' thus setting the molecular foundations for the modern era of cancer control. The pace of technological innovation from fundamental scientific discoveries to the policy impact of huge population studies has been breathtaking. One has only to contrast a paper on the treatment of solid epithelial cancers written by Henri Tagnon and colleagues in 1966 (Eur J Cancer2 51-7) with the myriad of chemotherapeutic approaches at the oncologists disposal today. Inevitably, as the tide of research has risen so it has bought the flotsam and jetsam of regulations and policies. Some have been helpful, many pointless and too many actually harmful. Naturally, some of these regulatory and general policies (by this I mean those concerned with funding, structure and organization) have been specifically targeted at cancer research, e.g. US National Cancer Act 1971, whilst others have been a product of the general regulatory environment with indirect consequences for cancer research, e.g. EU Data Protection Directive 1995. Policy issues thus cover a vast terrain criss-crossed by complex interdependencies between scientific areas, countries S&T policies and socio-political constructs. Unfortunately, there has been little attention paid to the consequences of these policy issues from which the research community has, by and large, been passenger rather than driver.Global investment in cancer research is now at unprecedented levels. The recently published report by the European Cancer Research Managers Forum has found some 14 billion euros being annually spent worldwide on cancer research (this figure includes industry but overall probably underestimates spend by at least one billion [2]). With the ageing demographics of developed countries and the catch-up effect in developing countries, the rising burden of cancer is driving research activity in cancer ever upwards. Opportunities for delivering even greater measures for preventing and controlling cancer abound, but the shackles of bureaucracy (stifling regulations and poor research policies) threaten this future more than ever-'Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains'. Jean-Jacques Rousseau's quote could equally be applied to spirit of research creativity in today's environment. So what are the main issues and what is to be done?
自从詹姆斯·沃森和弗朗西斯·克里克写下那句如今已不朽的话——“我们希望提出脱氧核糖核酸盐的一种结构”,从而奠定了现代癌症防治时代的分子基础以来,研究已为癌症患者及其家人带来了显著益处。从基础科学发现到大规模人群研究对政策产生影响,技术创新的步伐令人惊叹。只需将亨利·塔尼翁及其同事在1966年撰写的一篇关于实体上皮癌治疗的论文(《欧洲癌症杂志》2 51 - 7页)与如今肿瘤学家可采用的众多化疗方法进行对比即可。不可避免地,随着研究浪潮的高涨,它也带来了各种规章制度和政策的残骸废物。有些是有益的,许多是无意义的,而太多实际上是有害的。自然地,其中一些监管和总体政策(我指的是那些与资金、结构和组织有关的政策)是专门针对癌症研究的,例如1971年的美国《国家癌症法案》,而其他一些则是总体监管环境的产物,对癌症研究产生间接影响,例如1995年的欧盟《数据保护指令》。因此,政策问题涵盖了一个广阔的领域,科学领域、各国科技政策和社会政治结构之间存在复杂的相互依存关系,纵横交错。不幸的是,这些政策问题的后果很少受到关注,研究界在很大程度上一直是被动接受者而非推动者。
全球对癌症研究的投资如今达到了前所未有的水平。欧洲癌症研究管理人员论坛最近发布的报告发现,全球每年在癌症研究上的支出约为140亿欧元(这个数字包括行业投入,但总体上可能至少低估了10亿欧元的支出[2])。随着发达国家人口老龄化以及发展中国家的追赶效应,不断上升的癌症负担正推动着癌症研究活动持续增加。提供更多预防和控制癌症措施的机会比比皆是,但官僚主义的枷锁(扼杀性的法规和糟糕的研究政策)比以往任何时候都更威胁着这一未来——“人是生而自由的,但却无往不在枷锁之中”。让 - 雅克·卢梭的这句话同样适用于当今环境下的研究创新精神。那么主要问题是什么,又该如何应对呢?