• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对医院康复的满意度:通过 Rasch 分析验证 SAT-16 问卷。

Patient satisfaction with hospital rehabilitation: validation of the SAT-16 questionnaire through Rasch analysis.

机构信息

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation Clinica del Lavoro e della Riabilitazione, IRCCS, Nervi, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Med. 2012 Feb;103(1):1-11.

PMID:22278064
Abstract

AIM

The SAT-16 is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with the quality of care during stay in a rehabilitation unit. A comprehensive psychometric analysis of SAT-16 was performed using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis (RA) to examine its validity and metric properties, and provide further insights for its clinical use in rehabilitation settings.

METHODS

A sample of 9458 patients, consecutively admitted to two Rehabilitation Centres, was examined with SAT-16. Factor (both explorative and confirmatory) analysis and RA were used to process the data in order to examine validity and metric properties of SAT-16. Dimensionality, item fit to the model, response category performance and internal construct validity were assessed.

RESULTS

Two subscales were identified by factor analysis and expert review, respectively related to satisfaction with clinical care (items 1-9), and satisfaction with hospital organization and facilities ("hotel" aspects of care, items 10-16). Each subscale underwent a separate RA. Response categories were revised in both subscales of SAT-16, obtaining a new 3-level rating scale. Both subscales showed high internal consistency and internal validity.

CONCLUSION

RA confirmed the appropriateness of SAT-16 and its usefulness in identifying areas for quality improvement. Overall, the questionnaire allows to assess patient satisfaction with the services through: 1) two sub-scores respectively specific for satisfaction with "clinical care" and "hotel aspects of care"; 2) additional information gathered in the optional open-ended questions.

摘要

目的

SAT-16 是一个 16 项的自我管理问卷,用于测量患者对康复单元住院期间护理质量的满意度。使用经典测试理论和 Rasch 分析(RA)对 SAT-16 进行了全面的心理测量学分析,以检验其有效性和度量特性,并为其在康复环境中的临床应用提供进一步的见解。

方法

对连续入住两个康复中心的 9458 名患者进行了 SAT-16 检查。使用因子(探索性和验证性)分析和 RA 来处理数据,以检验 SAT-16 的有效性和度量特性。评估了维度、项目与模型的拟合、反应类别表现和内部结构有效性。

结果

通过因子分析和专家审查分别确定了两个分量表,分别与对临床护理的满意度(项目 1-9)和对医院组织和设施的满意度(护理的“酒店”方面,项目 10-16)相关。每个分量表都进行了单独的 RA。SAT-16 的两个分量表都进行了修订,增加了新的 3 级评分量表。两个分量表都显示出较高的内部一致性和内部有效性。

结论

RA 证实了 SAT-16 的适当性及其在确定质量改进领域的有用性。总体而言,该问卷通过以下方式评估患者对服务的满意度:1)两个分量表分别针对对“临床护理”和“酒店护理方面”的满意度;2)通过可选的开放式问题收集的附加信息。

相似文献

1
Patient satisfaction with hospital rehabilitation: validation of the SAT-16 questionnaire through Rasch analysis.患者对医院康复的满意度:通过 Rasch 分析验证 SAT-16 问卷。
Minerva Med. 2012 Feb;103(1):1-11.
2
[Validity and reliability of a new questionnaire on patient satisfaction in rehabilitative therapy].[一份关于康复治疗中患者满意度的新问卷的效度和信度]
Minerva Med. 1998 Mar;89(3):57-64.
3
Psychometric validation of the overactive bladder satisfaction with treatment questionnaire (OAB-SAT-q).膀胱过度活动症治疗满意度问卷(OAB-SAT-q)的心理测量学验证
Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):416-22. doi: 10.1002/nau.20672.
4
Patient perspective on quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation--development and psychometric testing of a questionnaire.患者对老年护理与康复质量的看法——一份问卷的编制与心理测量学测试
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):135-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00390.x.
5
Development and validation of the irritable bowel syndrome satisfaction with care scale.肠易激综合征护理满意度量表的编制与验证。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1065-71.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
6
Development and evaluation of an instrument to measure parental satisfaction with quality of care in neonatal follow-up.用于测量家长对新生儿随访护理质量满意度的工具的开发与评估
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009 Feb;30(1):57-65. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31819670fa.
7
Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess satisfaction with hospital emergency care.开发和验证用于评估对医院急诊护理满意度的问卷。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Sep;28(9):770-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.084996. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
8
Scale to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy.用于衡量患者对物理治疗满意度的量表。
Phys Ther. 2002 Jul;82(7):682-91.
9
Adaptation, data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish version of the PACIC questionnaire.丹麦版 PACIC 问卷的适应度、数据质量和验证性因子分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Feb;22(1):31-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq188. Epub 2010 Dec 5.
10
Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.信任护士量表:结构效度和内部信度评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):683-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of Rehabilitation Services and Rehabilitation-Related Patient Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty-Results of the Prospective FInGK Study.全膝关节置换术后康复服务的利用情况及与康复相关的患者满意度——前瞻性FInGK研究结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 22;12(21):2099. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212099.
2
Development of a universal short patient satisfaction questionnaire on the basis of SERVQUAL: Psychometric analyses with data of diabetes and stroke patients from six different European countries.基于 SERVQUAL 开发通用简短患者满意度问卷:来自六个不同欧洲国家的糖尿病和中风患者数据的心理计量学分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0197924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197924. eCollection 2019.
3
Which kind of psychometrics is adequate for patient satisfaction questionnaires?
哪种心理测量方法适用于患者满意度调查问卷?
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Oct 5;10:2083-2090. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S112398. eCollection 2016.