• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of automated alerts on follow-up of post-discharge microbiology results: a cluster randomized controlled trial.自动化警报对出院后微生物学结果随访的影响:一项集群随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1243-50. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-1986-8. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
2
The Impact of Automated Notification on Follow-up of Actionable Tests Pending at Discharge: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.自动化通知对出院时待处理可行动测试的随访的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1043-1051. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4393-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
Pending laboratory tests and the hospital discharge summary in patients discharged to sub-acute care.待实验室检查和出院小结完成后,再将患者转至亚急性护理。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):393-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1583-7. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
4
Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.出院待检检验结果自动化电子邮件通知系统的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):473-80. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002030. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
5
Pending studies at hospital discharge: a pre-post analysis of an electronic medical record tool to improve communication at hospital discharge.出院时待开展的研究:一项关于电子病历工具改善出院沟通情况的前后对照分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):312-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3064-x. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
6
Adequacy of hospital discharge summaries in documenting tests with pending results and outpatient follow-up providers.医院出院小结记录待检结果和门诊随访提供者的充分性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(9):1002-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1057-y. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
7
Incidence and predictors of microbiology results returning postdischarge and requiring follow-up.出院后微生物学结果返回并需要随访的发生率和预测因素。
J Hosp Med. 2011 May;6(5):291-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.895.
8
A Systematic Review of Interventions to Follow-Up Test Results Pending at Discharge.出院待随访检验结果的干预措施系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):750-758. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4290-9. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
9
Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge.出院后返回的检测结果引发的患者安全问题。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jul 19;143(2):121-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-2-200507190-00011.
10
Primary Care Providers' Opening of Time-Sensitive Alerts Sent to Commercial Electronic Health Record InBaskets.初级保健提供者对商业电子健康记录收件箱中发送的时间敏感警报的开启情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Nov;32(11):1210-1219. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4146-3. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Follow-up of Post-discharge Positive Sterile Site Cultures and the Impact on Infection-Related Complications.评估出院后无菌部位培养阳性的随访情况及其对感染相关并发症的影响。
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Mar;12(3):989-996. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00786-1. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
2
Recommendations for the Design and Delivery of Transitions-Focused Digital Health Interventions: Rapid Review.以过渡为重点的数字健康干预措施的设计与实施建议:快速综述
JMIR Aging. 2022 May 19;5(2):e35929. doi: 10.2196/35929.
3
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps.为何检测结果仍会“失联”无法跟进:一项关于实施差距的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06772-y. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
Organizational characteristics and perceptions of clinical event notification services in healthcare settings: a study of health information exchange.医疗机构中临床事件通知服务的组织特征与认知:一项关于健康信息交换的研究
JAMIA Open. 2020 Nov 29;3(4):611-618. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa065. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Variation in electronic test results management and its implications for patient safety: A multisite investigation.电子检测结果管理的变化及其对患者安全的影响:一项多地点调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):1214-1224. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa093.
6
Usage of query-based health information exchange after event notifications.事件通知后基于查询的健康信息交换的使用情况。
JAMIA Open. 2019 Aug 1;2(3):291-295. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz028. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
The impact of health information technology on the management and follow-up of test results - a systematic review.健康信息技术对检验结果管理和随访的影响——系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jul 1;26(7):678-688. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz032.
8
Semiautomated System for Nonurgent, Clinically Significant Pathology Results.非紧急、具有临床意义的病理学结果半自动系统。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):411-421. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1654700. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
9
The Impact of Automated Notification on Follow-up of Actionable Tests Pending at Discharge: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.自动化通知对出院时待处理可行动测试的随访的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1043-1051. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4393-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Interventions to Improve Follow-Up of Laboratory Test Results Pending at Discharge: A Systematic Review.改善出院时未决实验室检查结果随访的干预措施:一项系统综述
J Hosp Med. 2018 Sep;13(9):631-636. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2944.

本文引用的文献

1
Detecting delayed microbiology results after hospital discharge: improving patient safety through an automated medical informatics tool.检测出院后延迟的微生物学结果:通过自动化医学信息学工具提高患者安全性。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Dec;86(12):1181-5. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0415.
2
Incidence and predictors of microbiology results returning postdischarge and requiring follow-up.出院后微生物学结果返回并需要随访的发生率和预测因素。
J Hosp Med. 2011 May;6(5):291-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.895.
3
Lessons learned from implementation of a computerized application for pending tests at hospital discharge.从医院出院时待检计算机应用程序实施中吸取的经验教训。
J Hosp Med. 2011 Jan;6(1):16-21. doi: 10.1002/jhm.794. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
4
Pending laboratory tests and the hospital discharge summary in patients discharged to sub-acute care.待实验室检查和出院小结完成后,再将患者转至亚急性护理。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):393-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1583-7. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
5
Ten strategies to improve management of abnormal test result alerts in the electronic health record.改善电子健康记录中异常检查结果警报管理的十大策略。
J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun;6(2):121-3. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181ddf652.
6
Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication.利用电子健康记录改善异常癌症筛查的随访:信任但要验证测试结果的沟通。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 9;9:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-49.
7
Adequacy of hospital discharge summaries in documenting tests with pending results and outpatient follow-up providers.医院出院小结记录待检结果和门诊随访提供者的充分性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(9):1002-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1057-y. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
8
Patient readmissions, emergency visits, and adverse events after software-assisted discharge from hospital: cluster randomized trial.患者出院后再入院、急诊就诊和不良事件:软件辅助出院后的群组随机试验。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Sep;4(7):E11-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.469.
9
Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.美国医院中电子健康记录的使用情况。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1628-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0900592. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
10
Growth in the care of older patients by hospitalists in the United States.美国医院医生对老年患者护理的增长情况。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 12;360(11):1102-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802381.

自动化警报对出院后微生物学结果随访的影响:一项集群随机对照试验。

Impact of automated alerts on follow-up of post-discharge microbiology results: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., no. 0505, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093-0505, USA,

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1243-50. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-1986-8. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-012-1986-8
PMID:22278302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3445692/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Failure to follow up microbiology results pending at the time of hospital discharge can delay diagnosis and treatment of important infections, harm patients, and increase the risk of litigation. Current systems to track pending tests are often inadequate.

OBJECTIVE

To design, implement, and evaluate an automated system to improve follow-up of microbiology results that return after hospitalized patients are discharged.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized controlled trial.

SUBJECTS

Inpatient and outpatient physicians caring for adult patients hospitalized at a large academic hospital from February 2009 to June 2010 with positive and untreated or undertreated blood, urine, sputum, or cerebral spinal fluid cultures returning post-discharge.

INTERVENTION

An automated e-mail-based system alerting inpatient and outpatient physicians to positive post-discharge culture results not adequately treated with an antibiotic at the time of discharge.

MAIN MEASURES

Our primary outcome was documented follow-up of results within 3 days. Secondary outcomes included physician awareness and assessment of result urgency, impact on clinical assessments and plans, and preferred alerting scenarios.

KEY RESULTS

We evaluated the follow-up of 157 post-discharge microbiology results from patients of 121 physicians. We found documented follow-up in 27/97 (28%) results in the intervention group and 8/60 (13%) in the control group [aOR 3.2, (95% CI 1.3-8.4); p=0.01]. Of all inpatient physician respondents, 32/82 (39%) were previously aware of the results, 45/77 (58%) felt the results changed their assessments and plans, 43/77 (56%) felt the results required urgent action, and 67/70 (96%) preferred alerts for current or broader scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Our alerting system improved the proportion of important post-discharge microbiology results with documented follow-up, though the proportion remained low. The alerts were well received and may be expanded in the future.

摘要

背景

出院时未跟进待处理的微生物学结果可能会延迟重要感染的诊断和治疗,危害患者,并增加诉讼风险。目前跟踪待检的系统通常不够完善。

目的

设计、实施和评估一种自动系统,以改善出院后返回的微生物学结果的后续跟踪。

设计

集群随机对照试验。

研究对象

2009 年 2 月至 2010 年 6 月期间在一家大型学术医院住院的成年患者,其血液、尿液、痰或脑脊液培养物呈阳性且未经治疗或治疗不足,出院后返回。

干预措施

一种基于自动电子邮件的系统,提醒住院和门诊医生注意出院后未经适当抗生素治疗的阳性培养结果。

主要观察指标

我们的主要结果是在 3 天内记录结果的后续跟进情况。次要结果包括医生对结果紧迫性的认识和评估、对临床评估和计划的影响以及首选警报场景。

主要结果

我们评估了 121 名医生的 157 份出院后微生物学结果的后续情况。我们发现,在干预组的 97 个结果中有 27 个(28%)记录了后续情况,在对照组的 60 个结果中有 8 个(13%)[比值比 3.2,(95%置信区间 1.3-8.4);p=0.01]。在所有住院医生受访者中,32/82(39%)之前知道这些结果,45/77(58%)认为这些结果改变了他们的评估和计划,43/77(56%)认为这些结果需要紧急行动,67/70(96%)更喜欢当前或更广泛场景的警报。

结论

我们的警报系统提高了有记录的重要出院后微生物学结果的比例,但比例仍然很低。这些警报得到了很好的反馈,并可能在未来得到扩展。