文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

比较 azilsartan 与坎地沙坦西酯在日本 I-II 级原发性高血压患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲临床研究。

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine and Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2012 May;35(5):552-8. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.8. Epub 2012 Jan 26.


DOI:10.1038/hr.2012.8
PMID:22278628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3348575/
Abstract

Azilsartan is a novel angiotensin receptor blocker being developed for hypertension treatment. This 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of azilsartan (20-40 mg once daily by forced titration) and its ability to provide 24-h blood pressure (BP) control, with that of candesartan cilexetil (candesartan; 8-12 mg once daily by forced titration) in 622 Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension. Efficacy was evaluated by clinic-measured sitting BP, and by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at week 14. Participants (mean age: 57 years, 61% males) had a mean baseline sitting BP of 159.8/100.4 mm Hg. The mean change from baseline in sitting diastolic BP at week 16 (primary endpoint) was -12.4 mm Hg in the azilsartan group and -9.8 mm Hg in the candesartan group, demonstrating a statistically significant greater reduction with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: -2.6 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.08 to -1.22 mm Hg, P=0.0003). The week 16 (secondary endpoint) mean change from baseline in sitting systolic BP was -21.8 mm Hg and -17.5 mm Hg, respectively, a significant decrease with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: -4.4 mm Hg, 95% CI: -6.53 to -2.20 mm Hg, P<0.0001). On ABPM, the week 14 mean changes from baseline in diastolic and systolic BP were also significantly greater with azilsartan over a 24-h period, and during the daytime, night-time and early morning. Safety and tolerability were similar among the two groups. These data demonstrate that once-daily azilsartan provides a more potent 24-h sustained antihypertensive effect than that of candesartan but with equivalent safety.

摘要

奥美沙坦是一种新型的血管紧张素受体阻断剂,目前正在开发用于治疗高血压。这是一项为期 16 周、多中心、随机、双盲研究,比较了奥美沙坦(20-40mg 每日一次,强制滴定)和坎地沙坦西酯(坎地沙坦;8-12mg 每日一次,强制滴定)在 622 例 I-II 级原发性高血压日本患者中的疗效和安全性,评估指标为诊室测量的坐位血压和 14 周时的动态血压监测(ABPM)。参与者(平均年龄:57 岁,61%为男性)的基线坐位舒张压为 159.8/100.4mmHg。16 周时(主要终点),与基线相比,坐位舒张压的平均变化在奥美沙坦组为-12.4mmHg,在坎地沙坦组为-9.8mmHg,奥美沙坦组较坎地沙坦组的降幅具有统计学显著意义(差值:-2.6mmHg,95%置信区间(CI):-4.08 至-1.22mmHg,P=0.0003)。16 周时(次要终点),坐位收缩压的平均变化自基线分别为-21.8mmHg 和-17.5mmHg,奥美沙坦组较坎地沙坦组的降幅具有统计学显著意义(差值:-4.4mmHg,95%CI:-6.53 至-2.20mmHg,P<0.0001)。ABPM 结果显示,14 周时,奥美沙坦在 24 小时内舒张压和收缩压的平均变化均显著高于坎地沙坦,且在白天、夜间和清晨。两组的安全性和耐受性相似。这些数据表明,每日一次的奥美沙坦提供了更有效的 24 小时持续降压作用,优于坎地沙坦,但安全性相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a69/3348575/092d6d62a5af/hr20128f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a69/3348575/231b2e83db64/hr20128f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a69/3348575/ec35dc9ae274/hr20128f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a69/3348575/092d6d62a5af/hr20128f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a69/3348575/231b2e83db64/hr20128f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a69/3348575/ec35dc9ae274/hr20128f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a69/3348575/092d6d62a5af/hr20128f3.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study.

Hypertens Res. 2012-1-26

[2]
Efficacy and safety of 10-mg azilsartan compared with 8-mg candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with hypertension: a randomized crossover non-inferiority trial.

Hypertens Res. 2014-4-17

[3]
Effects of candesartan cilexetil in patients with severe systemic hypertension. Candesartan Cilexetil Study Investigators.

Am J Cardiol. 1999-8-1

[4]
A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of candesartan cilexetil and losartan as assessed by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after a missed dose, in truly hypertensive patients: a placebo-controlled, forced titration study. Candesartan/Losartan study investigators.

Am J Hypertens. 1999-12

[5]
A multicentre, 12-week study of imidapril and candesartan cilexetil in patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Clin Drug Investig. 2007

[6]
Effects of candesartan cilexetil in patients with systemic hypertension. Candesartan Cilexetil Study Investigators.

Am J Cardiol. 1998-10-15

[7]
Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemic hypertension. Comparison of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy (CASTLE) Study Investigators.

Am J Cardiol. 2001-3-15

[8]
Phase IV, 8-week, multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled, parallel group, efficacy, and tolerability study of high-dose candesartan cilexetil combined with hydrochlorothiazide in Korean adults with stage II hypertension.

Clin Ther. 2011-8-10

[9]
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine besilate compared with candesartan cilexetil monotherapy and amlodipine besilate monotherapy in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension: a multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

Clin Ther. 2012-3-21

[10]
Candesartan cilexetil: comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily administration for systemic hypertension. Candesartan Cilexetil Study Investigators.

Clin Ther. 1999-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Effect of Azilsartan on clinical blood pressure reduction compared to other angiotensin receptor blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023-12-8

[2]
Comparative Study of the Effects of Azilsartan and Telmisartan on Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Biomarkers in Essential Hypertension Associated With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Cureus. 2022-2-16

[3]
Safety and efficacy of azilsartan in paediatric patients with hypertension: a phase 3, single-arm, open-label, prospective study.

Clin Exp Nephrol. 2022-4

[4]
Catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension: the randomized, controlled REQUIRE trial.

Hypertens Res. 2022-2

[5]
Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Hypertension in Japan - Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Circ Rep. 2020-9-18

[6]
Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021-5

[7]
Solubility of Azilsartan in Methanol, Ethanol, Acetonitrile, -Propanol, Isopropanol, Tetrahydrofuran, and Binary Solvent Mixtures between 293.15 and 333.15 K.

ACS Omega. 2020-3-13

[8]
Azilsartan: Current Evidence and Perspectives in Management of Hypertension.

Int J Hypertens. 2019-11-3

[9]
Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis: Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers and Amlodipine in Asian Hypertensive Patients.

Int J Hypertens. 2019-11-11

[10]
Effects of azilsartan compared with telmisartan on insulin resistance in patients with essential hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: An open-label, randomized clinical trial.

PLoS One. 2019-4-3

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.

Hypertension. 2011-1-31

[2]
The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure.

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011-2

[3]
In vitro antagonistic properties of a new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan, in receptor binding and function studies.

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010-12-1

[4]
Uncontrolled hypertension based on morning and evening home blood pressure measurements from the J-HOME study.

Hypertens Res. 2009-9-25

[5]
The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2009).

Hypertens Res. 2009-1

[6]
Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Drugs. 2008

[7]
Effects of candesartan compared with amlodipine in hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risks: candesartan antihypertensive survival evaluation in Japan trial.

Hypertension. 2008-2

[8]
Regular alcohol drinking is a determinant of masked morning hypertension detected by home blood pressure monitoring in medicated hypertensive patients with well-controlled clinic blood pressure: the Jichi Morning Hypertension Research (J-MORE) study.

Hypertens Res. 2006-9

[9]
Prediction of stroke by home "morning" versus "evening" blood pressure values: the Ohasama study.

Hypertension. 2006-10

[10]
Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure.

JAMA. 2005-10-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索