Hospital Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, D-69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Eur Respir J. 2012 Jun;39(6):1334-42. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00161611. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
The Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema Palliation Trial (VENT) was a multi-centre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of unilateral endobronchial valve (EBV) treatment. The purpose of this analysis was to assess outcomes in the previously unreported European VENT study cohort. Patients with advanced emphysema were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive Zephyr® (Pulmonx Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) EBV treatment (n = 111) or medical management (n = 60). At 6 months, EBV patients demonstrated a significant improvement compared with the controls for mean ± SD change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (7 ± 20% versus 0.5 ± 19%; p = 0.067), cycle ergometry (2 ± 14 W versus -3 ± 10 W; p = 0.04) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (-5 ± 14 points versus 0.3 ± 13 points; p = 0.047). At 12 months, the magnitude of the difference between groups for change from baseline was of similar magnitude to the differences seen at 6 months. Rates for complications did not differ significantly. EBV patients with computed tomography (CT) scans suggestive of complete fissure and lobar occlusion had a mean ± SD lobar volume reduction of -80 ± 30% and >50% met minimal clinical difference thresholds. The degree of emphysema heterogeneity did not preclude excellent outcomes. Unilateral lobar volume reduction using EBV treatment is safe and superior clinical results correlated with CT suggestive of complete fissures and successful lobar occlusion. Emphysema heterogeneity was not critical for determining positive outcomes.
支气管内单向活瓣治疗肺气肿试验(VENT)是一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照试验,旨在评估单侧支气管内活瓣(EBV)治疗的安全性和有效性。本分析旨在评估此前未报告的欧洲 VENT 研究队列的结果。将晚期肺气肿患者随机分配(2:1)接受 Zephyr®(美国加利福尼亚州红木城的 Pulmonx Inc.)EBV 治疗(n=111)或药物治疗(n=60)。6 个月时,与对照组相比,EBV 患者的用力呼气量(FEV1)的平均变化±标准差显著改善(7±20%与 0.5±19%;p=0.067),循环运动试验(2±14W 与-3±10W;p=0.04)和圣乔治呼吸问卷(-5±14 分与 0.3±13 分;p=0.047)。12 个月时,与基线相比,两组间变化的差异程度与 6 个月时相似。并发症发生率无显著差异。CT 扫描提示完全裂和肺叶闭塞的 EBV 患者平均±标准差肺叶容积减少为-80±30%,>50%达到最小临床差异阈值。肺气肿异质性程度不排除良好的结果。使用 EBV 治疗进行单侧肺叶容积减少是安全的,与 CT 提示完全裂和成功的肺叶闭塞相关的临床结果更好。肺气肿异质性对确定阳性结果并不重要。