Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong, South Korea.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Apr 3;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02982-2.
Endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy, a validated method for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) in severe emphysema, has been explored for persistent air-leak (PAL) management. However, its effectiveness and safety in the Asian population require further real-world evaluation. In this study, we assessed the outcomes of treatment with EBV within this demographic.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from 11 Korean centers. For the emphysema cohort, inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with emphysema who underwent bronchoscopy intended for BLVR. We assessed these patients for clinical outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. All patients with PAL who underwent treatment with EBV were included. We identified the underlying causes of PAL and evaluated clinical outcomes after the procedure.
The severe emphysema cohort comprised 192 patients with an average age of 70.3 years, and 95.8% of them were men. Ultimately, 137 underwent treatment with EBV. Three months after the procedure, the BLVR group demonstrated a significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (+160 mL vs. +30 mL; P = 0.009). Radiographic evidence of lung volume reduction 6 months after BLVR was significantly associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.020; 95% confidence interval 0.038-0.650; P = 0.010). Although pneumothorax was more common in the BLVR group (18.9% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.018), death was higher in the no-BLVR group (38.5% vs. 54.5%, P = 0.001), whereas other adverse events were comparable between the groups. Within the subset of 18 patients with PAL, the predominant causes of air-leak included spontaneous secondary pneumothorax (44.0%), parapneumonic effusion/empyema (22.2%), and post-lung resection surgery (16.7%). Following the treatment, the majority (77.8%) successfully had their chest tubes removed. Post-procedural complications were minimal, with two incidences of hemoptysis and one of empyema, all of which were effectively managed.
Treatment with EBV provides substantial clinical benefits in the management of emphysema and PAL in the Asian population, suggesting a favorable outcome for this therapeutic approach.
支气管内活瓣(EBV)治疗是一种经过验证的用于治疗严重肺气肿的支气管镜肺减容术(BLVR)的方法,目前已被探索用于持续性肺漏气(PAL)的管理。然而,其在亚洲人群中的有效性和安全性仍需要进一步的真实世界评估。在本研究中,我们评估了 EBV 治疗在这一人群中的效果。
我们对 11 家韩国中心的病历进行了回顾性分析。对于肺气肿队列,纳入标准为诊断为肺气肿且接受 BLVR 支气管镜检查的患者。我们评估了这些患者的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)临床结局。所有接受 EBV 治疗 PAL 的患者均被纳入研究。我们确定了 PAL 的潜在原因,并评估了手术后的临床结果。
严重肺气肿队列包括 192 名平均年龄为 70.3 岁的患者,其中 95.8%为男性。最终,有 137 名患者接受了 EBV 治疗。术后 3 个月,BLVR 组 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)显著改善(+160 mL 比+30 mL;P=0.009)。BLVR 后 6 个月的肺部体积减少的影像学证据与生存率的改善显著相关(调整后的危险比 0.020;95%置信区间 0.038-0.650;P=0.010)。尽管 BLVR 组气胸更常见(18.9%比 3.8%;P=0.018),但无 BLVR 组死亡率更高(38.5%比 54.5%;P=0.001),而两组其他不良事件相当。在 18 名 PAL 患者亚组中,漏气的主要原因包括自发性继发性气胸(44.0%)、肺炎旁胸腔积液/脓胸(22.2%)和肺切除术后(16.7%)。治疗后,大多数(77.8%)患者成功拔除了胸腔引流管。术后并发症较少,仅有 2 例咯血和 1 例脓胸,均得到有效治疗。
在亚洲人群中,EBV 治疗在肺气肿和 PAL 的管理中提供了显著的临床获益,表明这种治疗方法有良好的效果。