• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对利益要强硬,对价值观要温和:冲突问题调节谈判中愤怒的影响。

Be hard on the interests and soft on the values: conflict issue moderates the effects of anger in negotiations.

机构信息

Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Dec;51(4):741-52. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02089.x. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02089.x
PMID:22283784
Abstract

Emotions play an important role in conflict resolution. Past work has found that negotiators tend to concede when confronted with anger. We argue and show that this effect occurs in conflicts about interests, but not in conflicts about values. In value conflicts that are more closely tied to a person's values, norms, and identity, expressions of anger are likely to backfire. We demonstrate that people deem expressions of anger more unfair in value conflicts than in interest conflicts (Study 1) and that they are more likely to engage in retaliatory and escalatory behaviours when confronted with an angry reaction in the context of a value issue rather than an interest issue (Study 2).

摘要

情绪在解决冲突中起着重要作用。过去的研究发现,当面对愤怒时,谈判者往往会让步。我们认为,这种效应只发生在利益冲突中,而不是在价值观冲突中。在与一个人的价值观、规范和身份更紧密相关的价值冲突中,表达愤怒很可能适得其反。我们证明,人们认为在价值冲突中表达愤怒比在利益冲突中更不公平(研究 1),并且当面对与价值问题而不是利益问题相关的愤怒反应时,他们更有可能采取报复性和升级性的行为(研究 2)。

相似文献

1
Be hard on the interests and soft on the values: conflict issue moderates the effects of anger in negotiations.对利益要强硬,对价值观要温和:冲突问题调节谈判中愤怒的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Dec;51(4):741-52. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02089.x. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
2
Cultural variance in the interpersonal effects of anger in negotiations.谈判中愤怒的人际影响的文化差异。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jun;21(6):882-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797610370755. Epub 2010 May 5.
3
Not all anger is created equal: the impact of the expresser's culture on the social effects of anger in negotiations.并非所有的愤怒都是平等的:表达者的文化对谈判中愤怒的社会影响的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Sep;98(5):785-98. doi: 10.1037/a0032387. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
4
When feeling bad is expected to be good: emotion regulation and outcome expectancies in social conflicts.当感到糟糕被预期是好的:社会冲突中的情绪调节和结果预期。
Emotion. 2012 Aug;12(4):807-16. doi: 10.1037/a0024443. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
5
On being peripheral and paying attention: prototypicality and information processing in intergroup conflict.处于边缘地位和关注:群体间冲突中的典型性和信息处理。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jan;98(1):63-79. doi: 10.1037/a0030988. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
6
Anger as a trigger for information search in integrative negotiations.愤怒作为整合性谈判中信息搜索的触发因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Jul;105(7):713-731. doi: 10.1037/apl0000458. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
The implications of value conflict: how disagreement on values affects self-involvement and perceived common ground.价值冲突的影响:价值观的分歧如何影响自我涉入和感知的共同点。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jun;38(6):798-807. doi: 10.1177/0146167211436320. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
8
The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations.谈判中愤怒与快乐的人际影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jan;86(1):57-76. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.57.
9
The communication of "pure" group-based anger reduces tendencies toward intergroup conflict because it increases out-group empathy.“纯粹”基于群体的愤怒的交流减少了群体间冲突的倾向,因为它增加了对群体外的同理心。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Aug;39(8):1043-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167213489140. Epub 2013 May 24.
10
Understanding emotional transitions: the interpersonal consequences of changing emotions in negotiations.理解情绪转变:谈判中情绪变化的人际后果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):541-56. doi: 10.1037/a0023545.