• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prediction of neck dissection requirement after definitive radiotherapy for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.头颈部鳞状细胞癌根治性放疗后颈清扫术需求的预测。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e367-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.062.
2
The role of postradiotherapy neck dissection in supraglottic carcinoma.放疗后颈部清扫术在声门上型癌中的作用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Jun 1;50(2):367-75. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01468-7.
3
Planned postradiotherapy neck dissection in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.晚期头颈癌患者放疗后计划性颈部清扫术。
Head Neck. 1998 Mar;20(2):132-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199803)20:2<132::aid-hed6>3.0.co;2-3.
4
Nodal metastases distribution in laryngeal cancer requiring total laryngectomy: Therapeutic implications for the N0 Neck.喉癌行全喉切除术时的淋巴结转移分布:N0 颈的治疗意义。
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2019 Jun;136(3S):S35-S38. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
5
Split therapy: planned neck dissection followed by definitive radiotherapy for a T1, T2 pharyngolaryngeal primary cancer with operable N2, N3 nodal metastases--a prospective study.分期治疗:对于伴有可手术切除的N2、N3区域淋巴结转移的T1、T2期咽喉原发性癌,先行计划性颈部淋巴结清扫术,随后进行根治性放疗——一项前瞻性研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2006 Jan 1;93(1):56-61. doi: 10.1002/jso.20399.
6
Expanded application of selective neck dissection with regard to nodal status.根据淋巴结状态扩大选择性颈清扫术的应用范围。
Head Neck. 1997 Jul;19(4):260-5. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199707)19:4<260::aid-hed3>3.0.co;2-z.
7
Positive surgical margins in neck dissection specimens in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and the effect of radiotherapy.头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者颈部清扫标本的手术切缘阳性情况及放疗效果
Head Neck. 2000 Sep;22(6):559-63. doi: 10.1002/1097-0347(200009)22:6<559::aid-hed3>3.0.co;2-7.
8
Planned neck dissection as an adjunct to the management of patients with advanced neck disease treated with definitive radiotherapy: for some or for all?计划性颈部清扫术作为确定性放疗治疗晚期颈部疾病患者的辅助治疗手段:是部分患者适用还是全部患者适用?
Head Neck. 1999 Oct;21(7):606-13. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199910)21:7<606::aid-hed4>3.0.co;2-g.
9
The efficacy of comprehensive neck dissection with or without postoperative radiotherapy in nodal metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts.伴有或不伴有术后放疗的根治性颈清扫术在上呼吸道和消化道鳞状细胞癌淋巴结转移中的疗效。
Laryngoscope. 1990 Nov;100(11):1194-8. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199011000-00012.
10
Thirty-year experience with 457 radical neck dissections in cancer of the mouth, pharynx, and larynx.关于口腔、咽和喉癌进行457例根治性颈清扫术的30年经验。
Am J Surg. 1989 Oct;158(4):303-7; discussion 308. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90120-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Results of salvage neck dissection after chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌放化疗后挽救性颈清扫术的结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):945-951. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08315-z. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
2
Prediction of residual disease using circulating DNA detection after potentiated radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer (NeckTAR): a study protocol for a prospective, multicentre trial.增强放疗后循环 DNA 检测预测局部晚期头颈部肿瘤(NeckTAR)的残留病灶:一项前瞻性、多中心试验的研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 4;23(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11136-2.
3
Impact of Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Unknown Primary.颈清扫术对原发灶不明的头颈部鳞状细胞癌的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 17;13(10):2416. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102416.
4
Challenges in Combining Immunotherapy with Radiotherapy in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.复发性/转移性头颈癌中免疫疗法与放射疗法联合应用面临的挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Oct 30;12(11):3197. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113197.
5
Neck management in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: where do we stand?头颈部鳞状细胞癌的颈部管理:我们处于什么位置?
Med Oncol. 2019 Mar 27;36(5):40. doi: 10.1007/s12032-019-1265-1.
6
Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Oligometastases in Lymph Nodes-A Review.立体定向放射治疗淋巴结寡转移瘤——综述
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818803597. doi: 10.1177/1533033818803597.
7
Prognostic Value of p16 Status on the Development of a Complete Response in Involved Oropharynx Cancer Neck Nodes After Cisplatin-Based Chemoradiation: A Secondary Analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 0129.基于顺铂的放化疗后,p16状态对累及口咽癌颈部淋巴结完全缓解发生情况的预后价值:NRG肿瘤学RTOG 0129的二次分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Oct 1;96(2):362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 May 28.
8
No benefit for regional control and survival by planned neck dissection in primary irradiated oropharyngeal cancer irrespective of p16 expression.对于原发性接受过放疗的口咽癌,无论p16表达情况如何,计划性颈部清扫术对区域控制和生存均无益处。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;273(7):1841-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3675-9. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Less may be more: nodal treatment in neck positive head neck cancer patients.少或许就是多:颈部淋巴结阳性头颈癌患者的淋巴结治疗
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jun;273(6):1549-56. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3634-5. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
10
Management of the lymph node-positive neck in the patient with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽癌患者淋巴结阳性颈部的处理。
Cancer. 2014 Oct 1;120(19):3082-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28831. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Sonographic examination of the neck after definitive radiotherapy for node-positive oropharyngeal cancer.明确放疗治疗阳性淋巴结口咽癌后的颈部超声检查。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Sep;32(8):1532-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2545. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
2
Neck response to chemoradiotherapy: complete radiographic response correlates with pathologic complete response in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer.颈部对放化疗的反应:在局部晚期头颈癌中,影像学完全缓解与病理完全缓解相关。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Nov;135(11):1133-6. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.154.
3
Cost-effectiveness of CT and PET-CT for determining the need for adjuvant neck dissection in locally advanced head and neck cancer.CT 和 PET-CT 用于确定局部晚期头颈部癌症辅助颈部清扫术需求的成本效益。
Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21(5):1072-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp405. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
4
[Neck dissection following chemoradiation for node positive head and neck carcinomas].[头颈部淋巴结阳性癌放化疗后行颈部清扫术]
Cancer Radiother. 2009 Dec;13(8):758-70. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
5
Planned neck dissection for patients with complete response to chemoradiotherapy: a concept approaching obsolescence.针对放化疗完全缓解的患者行计划性颈清扫术:一个即将过时的概念。
Head Neck. 2010 Feb;32(2):253-61. doi: 10.1002/hed.21173.
6
PET monitoring of therapy response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.正电子发射断层扫描(PET)对头颈部鳞状细胞癌治疗反应的监测
J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1:74S-88S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057208. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
7
Prospective risk-adjusted [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography assessment of radiation response in head and neck cancer.前瞻性风险调整的[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描和计算机断层扫描对头颈部癌放疗反应的评估
J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20;27(15):2509-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.3300. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
8
Controversies in surgical management of the node-positive neck after chemoradiation.放化疗后颈部淋巴结阳性的手术治疗争议
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2009 Jan;19(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.09.005.
9
Need for neck dissection after radiochemotherapy? A study of the French GETTEC Group.放化疗后是否需要进行颈部清扫术?法国GETTEC研究组的一项研究。
Laryngoscope. 2008 Oct;118(10):1775-80. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31817f192a.
10
Factors associated with severe late toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: an RTOG analysis.局部晚期头颈癌同步放化疗后严重晚期毒性反应的相关因素:一项美国放射肿瘤学组(RTOG)分析
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3582-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8841. Epub 2008 Jun 16.

头颈部鳞状细胞癌根治性放疗后颈清扫术需求的预测。

Prediction of neck dissection requirement after definitive radiotherapy for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e367-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.062.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.062
PMID:22284033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4124997/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This analysis was undertaken to assess the need for planned neck dissection in patients with a complete response (CR) of involved nodes after irradiation and to determine the benefit of a neck dissection in those with less than CR by tumor site.

METHODS

Our cohort included 880 patients with T1-4, N1-3M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx who received treatment between 1994 and 2004. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier Method, comparisons of rates with the log-rank test and prognostic factors by Cox's proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Nodal CR occurred in 377 (43%) patients, of whom 365 patients did not undergo nodal dissection. The 5-year actuarial regional control rate of patients with CR was 92%. Two hundred sixty-eight of the remaining patients (53%) underwent neck dissections. The 5-year actuarial regional control rate for patients without a CR was 84%. Those who had a neck dissection fared better with 5-year actuarial regional control rates of 90% and 76% for those operated and those not operated (p < 0.001). Variables associated with poorer regional control rates included higher T and N stage, non-oropharynx cancers, non-CR, both clinical and pathological.

CONCLUSIONS

With 92% 5-year neck control rate without neck dissection after CR, there is little justification for systematic neck dissection. The addition of a neck dissection resulted in higher neck control after partial response though patients with viable tumor on pathology specimens had poorer outcomes. The identification of that subgroup that benefits from additional treatment remains a challenge.

摘要

背景

本分析旨在评估照射后淋巴结完全缓解(CR)的患者是否需要进行计划性颈部清扫,并根据肿瘤部位确定部分缓解(PR)患者中颈部清扫的获益情况。

方法

我们的队列包括 880 名接受 1994 年至 2004 年治疗的口咽、喉或下咽 T1-4、N1-3M0 鳞状细胞癌患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算生存曲线,对数秩检验比较率,Cox 比例风险模型分析预后因素。

结果

377 名(43%)患者发生淋巴结 CR,其中 365 名患者未行淋巴结清扫。CR 患者的 5 年局部区域控制率为 92%。其余 268 名患者(53%)接受了颈部清扫。无 CR 的患者 5 年局部区域控制率为 84%。未行颈部清扫的患者中,行颈部清扫者的 5 年局部区域控制率分别为 90%和 76%(p<0.001)。与局部区域控制率较差相关的变量包括更高的 T 和 N 分期、非口咽癌、非 CR、临床和病理。

结论

CR 后 5 年颈部无清扫的局部区域控制率为 92%,因此没有充分理由进行系统的颈部清扫。尽管病理标本上存在存活肿瘤的患者结局较差,但部分缓解患者增加颈部清扫可提高颈部控制率。确定受益于额外治疗的亚组仍然是一个挑战。