• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

D-二聚体检测界值升高伴低临床可能性可降低疑似肺栓塞患者行不必要的计算机断层肺动脉造影。

D-dimer threshold increase with pretest probability unlikely for pulmonary embolism to decrease unnecessary computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Apr;10(4):572-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04647.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04647.x
PMID:22284935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3319270/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing the threshold to define a positive D-dimer could reduce unnecessary computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for a suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) but might increase rates of a missed PE and missed pneumonia, the most common non-thromboembolic diagnosis seen on CTPA.

OBJECTIVE

Measure the effect of doubling the standard D-dimer threshold for 'PE unlikely' Revised Geneva (RGS) or Wells' scores on the exclusion rate, frequency and size of a missed PE and missed pneumonia.

METHODS

Patients evaluated for a suspected PE with 64-channel CTPA were prospectively enrolled from emergency departments (EDs) and inpatient units of four hospitals. Pretest probability data were collected in real time and the D-dimer was measured in a central laboratory. Criterion standard was CPTA interpretation by two independent radiologists combined with clinical outcome at 30 days.

RESULTS

Of 678 patients enrolled, 126 (19%) were PE+ and 93 (14%) had pneumonia. Use of either Wells' ≤ 4 or RGS ≤ 6 produced similar results. For example, with RGS ≤ 6 and standard threshold (< 500 ng mL(-1)), D-dimer was negative in 110/678 (16%), and 4/110 were PE+ (posterior probability 3.8%) and 9/110 (8.2%) had pneumonia. With RGS ≤ 6 and a threshold < 1000 ng mL(-1) , D-dimer was negative in 208/678 (31%) and 11/208 (5.3%) were PE+, but 10/11 missed PEs were subsegmental and none had concomitant DVT. Pneumonia was found in 12/208 (5.4%) with RGS ≤ 6 and D-dimer < 1000 ng mL(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

Doubling the threshold for a positive D-dimer with a PE unlikely pretest probability could reduce CTPA scanning with a slightly increased risk of missed isolated subsegmental PE, and no increase in rate of missed pneumonia.

摘要

背景

提高 D-二聚体阳性阈值以诊断可疑肺栓塞(PE),可能会减少不必要的 CT 肺动脉造影(CTPA)检查,但可能会增加漏诊 PE 和肺炎的发生率,而肺炎是 CTPA 最常见的非血栓栓塞性诊断。

目的

测量将修订版日内瓦(RGS)或 Wells 评分中“PE 可能性低”的 D-二聚体标准阈值翻倍对排除率、漏诊 PE 和肺炎的频率和大小的影响。

方法

前瞻性纳入四家医院急诊科和住院部疑似 PE 患者进行 64 排 CTPA 检查。实时收集预测试概率数据,并在中心实验室测量 D-二聚体。将 CTPA 两位独立放射科医生的解读结果与 30 天的临床结局相结合作为金标准。

结果

在纳入的 678 例患者中,126 例(19%)为 PE+,93 例(14%)患有肺炎。使用 Wells≤4 或 RGS≤6 评分得到了相似的结果。例如,在 RGS≤6 和标准阈值(<500ng/mL)下,678 例患者中有 110 例 D-二聚体为阴性(16%),其中 4 例为 PE+(后验概率 3.8%),9 例(8.2%)患有肺炎。在 RGS≤6 和阈值<1000ng/mL 时,678 例患者中有 208 例 D-二聚体为阴性(31%),其中 11 例为 PE+,但 10 例漏诊的 PE 均为亚段性,且均无并发深静脉血栓形成。在 RGS≤6 和 D-二聚体<1000ng/mL 时,208 例患者中有 12 例(5.4%)患有肺炎。

结论

对于 PE 可能性低的患者,将 D-二聚体阳性阈值翻倍,可减少 CTPA 扫描,但可能会略微增加漏诊孤立性亚段性 PE 的风险,且不会增加漏诊肺炎的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c1/3319270/52f1b2341b29/nihms354327f3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c1/3319270/a945f0ca315d/nihms354327f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c1/3319270/7ae9d184cf94/nihms354327f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c1/3319270/52f1b2341b29/nihms354327f3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c1/3319270/a945f0ca315d/nihms354327f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c1/3319270/7ae9d184cf94/nihms354327f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c1/3319270/52f1b2341b29/nihms354327f3a.jpg

相似文献

1
D-dimer threshold increase with pretest probability unlikely for pulmonary embolism to decrease unnecessary computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography.D-二聚体检测界值升高伴低临床可能性可降低疑似肺栓塞患者行不必要的计算机断层肺动脉造影。
J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Apr;10(4):572-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04647.x.
2
Age-adjusted D-dimer excludes pulmonary embolism and reduces unnecessary radiation exposure in older adults: retrospective study.年龄校正后的D-二聚体可排除老年人的肺栓塞并减少不必要的辐射暴露:一项回顾性研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Jul;93(1101):420-424. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134552. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
3
Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.回顾性验证“PE 可能性不大”的疑似肺栓塞患者中肺栓塞排除标准规则。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(3):185-190. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000442.
4
Over-Testing for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in American Emergency Departments: The Continuing Epidemic.美国急诊科对疑似肺栓塞的过度检测:持续的流行病。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jan;13(1):e005753. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005753. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
5
Variable D-dimer thresholds for diagnosis of clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism.不同 D-二聚体界值用于诊断疑似急性肺栓塞。
J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Nov;11(11):1986-92. doi: 10.1111/jth.12394.
6
Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.年龄校正 D-二聚体界值排除肺栓塞:ADJUST-PE 研究。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1117-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2135.
7
Assessment of the safety and efficiency of using an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold to exclude suspected pulmonary embolism.评估使用年龄校正 D-二聚体阈值排除疑似肺栓塞的安全性和有效性。
Chest. 2014 Dec;146(6):1444-1451. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2386.
8
Failure rate of D-dimer testing in patients with high clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: Ancillary analysis of three European studies.肺栓塞临床高度疑似患者中D-二聚体检测的失败率:三项欧洲研究的辅助分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Feb;32(2):116-122. doi: 10.1111/acem.15032. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
9
A simple decision rule including D-dimer to reduce the need for computed tomography scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.一种简单的决策规则,包括 D-二聚体,以减少疑似肺栓塞患者进行计算机断层扫描的需求。
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Aug;13(8):1428-35. doi: 10.1111/jth.13011. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
10
Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.疑似急性肺栓塞患者评估:美国医师学院临床指南委员会的最佳实践建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):701-11. doi: 10.7326/M14-1772. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Chest non‑contrasted computed tomography in detecting acute pulmonary thromboembolism: A single‑center retrospective study.胸部非增强计算机断层扫描在检测急性肺血栓栓塞症中的应用:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Exp Ther Med. 2024 May 29;28(2):304. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12593. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prediction model based on a patient data meta-analysis.急性肺栓塞的诊断管理:基于患者数据荟萃分析的预测模型。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Aug 22;44(32):3073-3081. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad417.
3
How to Combat Over-Testing for Patients Suspected of Pulmonary Embolism: A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.临床决策规则排除肺栓塞: 荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):448-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007.
2
Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism.成人患者因疑似肺栓塞而到急诊科就诊的评估和管理中的关键问题。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;57(6):628-652.e75. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.020.
3
Effectiveness and acceptability of a computerized decision support system using modified Wells criteria for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism.
如何应对疑似肺栓塞患者的过度检查:一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 3;13(7):1326. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071326.
4
Current use of D-dimer for the exclusion of venous thrombosis in hospitalized patients.目前在住院患者中使用 D-二聚体排除静脉血栓。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 20;12(1):12376. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16515-6.
5
Value of D-dimer in predicting various clinical outcomes following community-acquired pneumonia: A network meta-analysis.D-二聚体预测社区获得性肺炎后各种临床结局的价值:一项网状荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 23;17(2):e0263215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263215. eCollection 2022.
6
Characterization and Significance of Monocytes in Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection.急性斯坦福 B 型主动脉夹层中单核细胞的特征及意义。
J Immunol Res. 2020 May 15;2020:9670360. doi: 10.1155/2020/9670360. eCollection 2020.
7
Provider Perspectives on the Use of Evidence-based Risk Stratification Tools in the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism: A Qualitative Study.提供者视角下基于证据的风险分层工具在肺栓塞评估中的应用:一项定性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;27(6):447-456. doi: 10.1111/acem.13908. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
8
Anticoagulant and Antithrombotic Properties in Vitro and in Vivo of a Novel Sulfated Polysaccharide from Marine Green Alga .新型海洋绿藻硫酸多糖的体外和体内抗凝抗栓特性研究。
Mar Drugs. 2019 Apr 25;17(4):247. doi: 10.3390/md17040247.
9
Impact of Patient Affect on Physician Estimate of Probability of Serious Illness and Test Ordering.患者情感对医生对严重疾病概率的估计及检查医嘱的影响。
Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11):1607-1616. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001674.
10
Diagnostic implication of fibrin degradation products and D-dimer in aortic dissection.纤维蛋白降解产物和 D-二聚体对主动脉夹层的诊断意义。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 6;7:43957. doi: 10.1038/srep43957.
应用改良 Wells 标准评估疑似肺栓塞的计算机决策支持系统的有效性和可接受性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;57(6):613-21. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.09.018. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
4
Clinical outcomes in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli diagnosed by multidetector CT pulmonary angiography.多排螺旋 CT 肺动脉造影诊断孤立性亚段肺栓塞患者的临床转归。
Thromb Res. 2010 Oct;126(4):e266-70. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
5
Factors associated with positive D-dimer results in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism.评估肺栓塞患者时与 D-二聚体阳性结果相关的因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):589-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00765.x.
6
Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies.亚段性肺栓塞的计算机断层诊断:发生率和临床意义。管理结果研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Aug;8(8):1716-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03938.x. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
7
Coagulation and inflammation biomarkers may help predict the severity of community-acquired pneumonia.凝血和炎症生物标志物可能有助于预测社区获得性肺炎的严重程度。
Respirology. 2010 Jul;15(5):796-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01773.x. Epub 2010 May 20.
8
Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts.年龄校正 D-二聚体截断值提高老年患者肺栓塞排除率的潜力:三个大型队列的回顾性分析。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 30;340:c1475. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1475.
9
Prospective multicenter assessment of interobserver agreement for radiologist interpretation of multidetector computerized tomographic angiography for pulmonary embolism.多中心前瞻性评估多排计算机断层血管造影术在肺栓塞中放射科医师判读的观察者间一致性。
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Mar;8(3):533-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03724.x. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
10
Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the outpatient setting.门诊患者行增强计算机断层扫描后对比剂肾病的发生率。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jan;5(1):4-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05200709. Epub 2009 Dec 3.