Department of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1692-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.030. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
Xerostomia (dry mouth) after head/neck radiation is a common problem among cancer patients. Quality of life (QOL) is impaired, and available treatments are of little benefit. This trial determined the feasibility of conducting a sham-controlled trial of acupuncture and whether acupuncture could prevent xerostomia among head/neck patients undergoing radiotherapy.
A sham controlled, feasibility trial was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy. To determine feasibility of a sham procedure, 23 patients were randomised to real acupuncture (N=11) or to sham acupuncture (N=12). Patients were treated three times/week during the course of radiotherapy. Subjective measures were the Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN). Objective measures were unstimulated whole salivary flow rates (UWSFR) and stimulated salivary flow rates (SSFR). Patients were followed for 1 month after radiotherapy.
XQ scores for acupuncture were significantly lower than sham controls starting in week 3 and lasted through the 1-month follow-up (all P's <0.001 except for week 3, which was 0.006), with clinically significant differences as follows: week 6 - RR 0.28 [95% confidence interval, 0.10, 0.79]; week 11 - RR 0.17 [95%CI, 0.03, 1.07]. Similar findings were seen for MDASI-HN scores and MDASI-Intrusion scores. Group differences for UWSFR and SSFR were not found.
In this small pilot study, true acupuncture given concurrently with radiotherapy significantly reduced xerostomia symptoms and improved QOL when compared with sham acupuncture. Large-scale, multi-centre, randomised and placebo-controlled trials are now needed.
头颈部放疗后口干(口干症)是癌症患者的常见问题。生活质量(QOL)受损,可用的治疗方法收效甚微。本试验旨在确定针刺假对照试验的可行性,以及针刺是否可以预防头颈部放疗患者的口干症。
在中国上海复旦大学附属肿瘤中心,对接受放疗的鼻咽癌患者进行了一项假对照、可行性试验。为了确定假手术程序的可行性,将 23 名患者随机分为真针刺(N=11)或假针刺(N=12)。患者在放疗过程中每周接受三次治疗。主观测量为口干问卷(XQ)和 MD 安德森头颈部癌症症状量表(MDASI-HN)。客观测量为非刺激全唾液流率(UWSFR)和刺激唾液流率(SSFR)。患者在放疗后 1 个月内接受随访。
针刺组的 XQ 评分从第 3 周开始明显低于假对照组,并且在 1 个月的随访期间一直持续(所有 P 值均<0.001,除了第 3 周为 0.006),具有临床显著差异:第 6 周 - RR 0.28 [95%置信区间,0.10,0.79];第 11 周 - RR 0.17 [95%置信区间,0.03,1.07]。MDASI-HN 评分和 MDASI-Intrusion 评分也有类似的发现。未发现 UWSFR 和 SSFR 的组间差异。
在这项小型试点研究中,与假针刺相比,在放疗时同时给予真针刺可显著减轻口干症状并改善 QOL。现在需要进行大规模、多中心、随机和安慰剂对照试验。