Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;143(4 Suppl):S68-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.011. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
Perfusion strategies and operative techniques for minimally invasive mitral valve repair have evolved over time. During the past decade, our institution's approach has progressed from a port access platform with femoral perfusion to predominantly a central aortic cannulation through a right anterior minithoracotomy incision. We analyzed this institutional experience to evaluate the impact of approach on patient outcomes.
Between 1995 and 2007, 1282 patients (mean age, 59.3 years; range, 18-99 years) underwent first-time, isolated mitral valve repair using a minimally invasive technique. Patient demographics included peripheral vascular disease (3.2%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8.3%), atherosclerotic aorta (6.5%), cerebrovascular disease (4.3%), and ejection fraction less than 30% (4.3%). Retrograde perfusion was performed in 394 (30.7%) of all patients and endoaortic balloon occlusion in 373 (29.1%); the operative technique was a right anterior minithoracotomy in 1264 (98.6%) and left posterior minithoracotomy in 18 (1.4%). The etiology of mitral disease was degenerative in 73.2%, functional in 20.6%, and rheumatic in 2.4%. Data were collected prospectively using the New York State Cardiac Surgery Report System and a customized minimally invasive surgery data form. Logistic analysis was used to evaluate risk factors and outcomes; operative experience was divided into tertiles.
Overall hospital mortality was 2.0% (25/1282). Mortality was 1.1% (10/939) for patients with degenerative etiology and 0.4% (3/693) for patients younger than 70 years of age with degenerative valve disease. Risk factors for death were advanced age (P = .007), functional etiology (P = .010; odds ratio [OR] = 3.3), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .013; OR = 3.4), peripheral vascular disease (P = .014; OR = 4.2), and atherosclerotic aorta (P = .03; OR = 2.8). Logistic risk factors for neurologic events were advanced age (P = .02), retrograde perfusion (P = .001; OR = 3.8), and emergency procedure (P = .01; OR = 66.6). Interaction modeling revealed that the only significant risk factor for neurologic event was the use of retrograde perfusion in high-risk patients with aortic disease (P = .04; OR = 8.5). Analysis of successive tertiles during this 12-year experience revealed a significant decrease in the use of retrograde arterial perfusion (89.6%, 10.4%, and 0.0%; P < .001) and endoaortic balloon occlusion (89.3%, 10.7%, and 0%; P < .001). The overall frequency of postoperative neurologic events was 2.3% (30/1282) and decreased from 4.7% in the first tertile to 1.2% in the second and third tertiles (P < .001).
Central aortic cannulation through a right anterior minithoracotomy for mitral valve repair allows excellent outcomes in patients with a broad spectrum of comorbidities and has become our preferred approach for most patients undergoing mitral valve repair. Retrograde arterial perfusion is associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease and should be reserved for select patients without significant atherosclerosis.
微创二尖瓣修复的灌注策略和手术技术随着时间的推移而不断发展。在过去的十年中,我们机构的方法已经从股动脉灌注的端口接入平台发展到主要通过右前小开胸切口进行主动脉中央插管。我们分析了这种机构经验,以评估方法对患者结局的影响。
1995 年至 2007 年间,1282 例(平均年龄 59.3 岁;范围 18-99 岁)首次接受微创技术二尖瓣修复的患者。患者的人口统计学特征包括外周血管疾病(3.2%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(8.3%)、动脉粥样硬化主动脉(6.5%)、脑血管疾病(4.3%)和射血分数小于 30%(4.3%)。394 例(30.7%)患者行逆行灌注,373 例(29.1%)行主动脉内球囊阻断术;1264 例(98.6%)采用右前小开胸术,18 例(1.4%)采用左后小开胸术。二尖瓣疾病的病因在 73.2%的患者中为退行性,20.6%的患者为功能性,2.4%的患者为风湿性。使用纽约州心脏手术报告系统和定制的微创手术数据表格前瞻性地收集数据。使用逻辑分析评估危险因素和结局;手术经验分为三分位。
总的医院死亡率为 2.0%(25/1282)。退行性病因患者的死亡率为 1.1%(10/939),年龄小于 70 岁且退行性瓣膜病患者的死亡率为 0.4%(3/693)。死亡的危险因素是年龄较大(P =.007)、功能性病因(P =.010;优势比[OR] = 3.3)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(P =.013;OR = 3.4)、外周血管疾病(P =.014;OR = 4.2)和动脉粥样硬化主动脉(P =.03;OR = 2.8)。神经事件的逻辑危险因素是年龄较大(P =.02)、逆行灌注(P =.001;OR = 3.8)和紧急手术(P =.01;OR = 66.6)。交互模型显示,主动脉疾病高危患者中逆行灌注的唯一显著危险因素是神经事件(P =.04;OR = 8.5)。在这 12 年的经验中,对连续三分位数的分析显示,逆行动脉灌注(89.6%、10.4%和 0.0%;P <.001)和主动脉内球囊阻断术(89.3%、10.7%和 0%;P <.001)的使用显著减少。术后神经事件的总发生率为 2.3%(30/1282),第一三分位数的发生率为 4.7%,第二和第三三分位数的发生率为 1.2%(P <.001)。
通过右前小开胸切口进行主动脉中央插管进行二尖瓣修复可使患有广泛合并症的患者获得良好的结局,并且已成为我们为大多数二尖瓣修复患者首选的方法。逆行动脉灌注与严重外周血管疾病患者中风风险增加相关,应保留给没有明显动脉粥样硬化的选择患者。