Department of Health Services Research and Administration, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):132-40. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182294e66.
This study examined the relationship between county variation in macro contextual variables and the performance of public health practice in regional local health departments (LHDs) in Nebraska. DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: County-level data from the US Census Bureau, the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, and the University of Nebraska Medical Center's Health Professions Tracking Services were used to create macro context variables (eg, demographic, geographic, social, economic, population health status). The public health performance data were collected through a mail survey of the directors of regional LHDs in Nebraska in 2008. Public health performance measures were created to indicate LHD's general performance as well as core function specific performance (ie, assessment, assurance, policy development). The coefficients of variation were estimated and used to categorize each regional LHD into either a larger county variation group or a smaller county variation group for each domain of macro context variables. Statistical comparisons of public health performance measures were then made between these 2 groups for each domain.
The results suggest that the county variation in macro contextual variables within a regional public health district, in general, is negatively associated with the performance of public health practice in regional LHDs. The regional LHD's performance in specific public health core function (eg, assurance) is negatively associated with the county variation in specific types of macro context factors (eg, geographic factors such as land size and population density).
Regional LHDs may design and implement their public health programs on the basis of the type and degree of heterogeneity among the member counties within their jurisdiction. The formation of regional LHDs, if possible, should follow geographic boundaries that minimize the heterogeneity of county composition in terms of macro contextual factors.
本研究考察了宏观环境变量的县际差异与内布拉斯加州地区地方卫生部门(LHD)公共卫生实践绩效之间的关系。
使用来自美国人口普查局、内布拉斯加州卫生和人类服务部以及内布拉斯加大学医学中心卫生专业跟踪服务的数据创建宏观环境变量(例如,人口统计学、地理、社会、经济、人口健康状况)。公共卫生绩效数据是通过 2008 年内布拉斯加州地区 LHD 主任的邮件调查收集的。创建了公共卫生绩效指标,以指示 LHD 的总体绩效以及核心职能特定绩效(即评估、保证、政策制定)。估计了变异系数,并将每个区域 LHD 按每个宏观环境变量域中的较大县变异组或较小县变异组进行分类。然后,针对每个域,对这 2 个组之间的公共卫生绩效指标进行了统计比较。
结果表明,区域公共卫生区内部的宏观环境变量的县际差异通常与区域 LHD 的公共卫生实践绩效呈负相关。区域 LHD 在特定公共卫生核心职能(例如保证)方面的绩效与特定类型宏观环境因素(例如地理因素,如土地面积和人口密度)的县际差异呈负相关。
区域 LHD 可以根据其管辖范围内成员县的类型和异质性程度来设计和实施其公共卫生计划。如果可能的话,区域 LHD 的形成应遵循地理边界,以最大限度地减少县组成在宏观环境因素方面的异质性。