Suppr超能文献

西欧的基因检测立法——一个波动的监管目标。

Genetic testing legislation in Western Europe-a fluctuating regulatory target.

作者信息

Soini Sirpa

机构信息

Faculty of Law, Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2012 Jan 28;3(2):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0078-0.

Abstract

Rapid developments of biomedical science have initiated different fora to take stand on the protection of human rights and human dignity. In front of the new genomic era with the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, a plethora of instruments addressing human genetic testing emerged, some looking suspiciously like legal acts. The notion of genetic exceptionalism was characteristic to the normative reactions in the legal acts, but it can be questioned how justified this is. Despite the critique on genetic exceptionalism, it is argued that in certain situations detection of a serious genetic anomaly may cause extra anxiety in a person tested, if the knowledge has a great significance also to family members. Regulative needs should depend on the context and purpose of the test. This review examines the legal framework governing the use of genetic tests in the clinical setting in Western Europe. Five countries have enacted genetic specific laws, and three have comprehensive provisions pertaining genetic testing in their biomedical legislation. Central provisions cover informed consent, autonomy and integrity of the person tested, further uses of tests results, quality requirements of the personnel and facilities involved. Moreover, contemporary challenges related to whole genome sequencing, direct-to-consumer genetic tests and insurance are briefly discussed.

摘要

生物医学科学的快速发展引发了不同的论坛就人权和人类尊严的保护表明立场。在2003年人类基因组计划完成后的新基因组时代面前,出现了大量涉及人类基因检测的文书,其中一些看起来很像法律行为。基因例外论的概念是法律行为中规范性反应的特征,但这种做法的合理性值得质疑。尽管对基因例外论存在批评,但有人认为,在某些情况下,如果检测出严重的基因异常对受测者来说意义重大,且对其家庭成员也有很大影响,那么这可能会给受测者带来额外的焦虑。监管需求应取决于检测的背景和目的。本综述考察了西欧临床环境中基因检测使用的法律框架。五个国家颁布了基因专项法律,三个国家在其生物医学立法中有关于基因检测的全面规定。核心规定包括知情同意、受测者的自主性和完整性、检测结果的进一步使用、相关人员和设施的质量要求。此外,还简要讨论了与全基因组测序、直接面向消费者的基因检测和保险相关的当代挑战。

相似文献

3
Abortion and informed consent requirements.堕胎与知情同意要求。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Sep 1;144(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90384-2.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
8
The legislation on living organ donation in Western Europe: legal and ethical analysis and impact on clinical practice.
Transplant Proc. 2013 Sep;45(7):2576-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.07.010.

引用本文的文献

3
Legal aspects of genetic testing in the evaluation of ventricular tachycardias.遗传性心律失常评估中的基因检测的法律问题。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2023 Sep;34(3):205-211. doi: 10.1007/s00399-023-00948-1. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
9
Opportunities and Challenges for Genetic Studies of End-Stage Renal Disease in Canada.加拿大终末期肾病基因研究的机遇与挑战
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Jul 22;5:2054358118789368. doi: 10.1177/2054358118789368. eCollection 2018.
10
Preventing discrimination based on psychiatric risk biomarkers.预防基于精神疾病风险生物标志物的歧视。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019 Mar;180(2):159-171. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32629. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

3
Genomics, health care, and society.基因组学、医疗保健与社会。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):1033-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1010517.
5
Individual genomes on the horizon.个人基因组即将出现。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 1;362(13):1235-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1001090. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
6
Genetic risk prediction--are we there yet?基因风险预测——我们做到了吗?
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 23;360(17):1701-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0810107. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
7
Conceptual quandaries about genetic data--a comparative perspective.
Eur J Health Law. 2009 Mar;16(1):7-26. doi: 10.1163/157180909x400204.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验