Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 May;121(2):498-510. doi: 10.1037/a0025308. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
The field of personality disorders has had a long-standing interest in understanding interactions between emotion and inhibitory control, as well as neurophysiological indices of these processes. More work in particular is needed to clarify differential deficits in offenders with antisocial personality disorder (APD) who differ on psychopathic traits, as APD and psychopathy are considered separate, albeit related, syndromes. Evidence of distinct neurobiological processing in these disorders would have implications for etiology-based personality disorder taxonomies in future psychiatric classification systems. To inform this area of research, we recorded event-related brain potentials during an emotional-linguistic Go/No-Go task to examine modulation of negative emotional processing by inhibitory control in three groups: psychopathy (n = 14), APD (n = 16), and control (n = 15). In control offenders, inhibitory control demands (No-Go vs. Go) modulated frontal-P3 amplitude to negative emotional words, indicating appropriate prioritization of inhibition over emotional processing. In contrast, the psychopathic group showed blunted processing of negative emotional words regardless of inhibitory control demands, consistent with research on emotional deficits in psychopathy. Finally, the APD group demonstrated enhanced processing of negative emotion words in both Go and No-Go trials, suggesting a failure to modulate negative emotional processing when inhibitory control is required. Implications for emotion-cognition interactions and putative etiological processes in these personality disorders are discussed.
人格障碍领域长期以来一直关注情绪与抑制控制之间的相互作用,以及这些过程的神经生理指标。特别是需要更多的工作来澄清具有反社会人格障碍(APD)的罪犯之间的差异缺陷,这些罪犯在精神病态特征上存在差异,因为 APD 和精神病态被认为是分开的,尽管是相关的综合征。这些疾病中存在不同的神经生物学处理的证据将对未来精神病分类系统中基于病因的人格障碍分类学产生影响。为了说明这一研究领域,我们在情绪语言 Go/No-Go 任务中记录了事件相关脑电位,以检查三种群体(精神病态组 n = 14、APD 组 n = 16 和对照组 n = 15)中抑制控制对负性情绪处理的调节作用。在对照组罪犯中,抑制控制要求(No-Go 与 Go)调节了负性情绪词的额前 P3 振幅,表明对抑制作用的优先性超过了对情绪处理的优先性。相比之下,精神病态组无论抑制控制要求如何,对负性情绪词的处理都比较迟钝,这与精神病态中的情绪缺陷研究一致。最后,APD 组在 Go 和 No-Go 试验中都表现出对负性情绪词的处理增强,表明在需要抑制控制时,无法调节负性情绪处理。讨论了这些人格障碍中情绪与认知相互作用和潜在病因过程的意义。