Vickers R R, Hervig L K, Rahe R H, Rosenman R H
Psychosom Med. 1981 Oct;43(5):381-96. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198110000-00001.
The relationship of coping and defense to Type A behavior pattern (TABP), as measured by the Structured Interview and the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS), was investigated to understand the dynamics of TABP and psychological factors associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. It was hypothesized that global TABP and its component "speed and impatience" would be related to the use of defense mechanisms, while the TABP attribute "job involvement" would be related to high coping. The interview measure of global TABP was not related to coping and defense. For the JAS, "Job involvement" was related to high coping scores and low defense scores, "speed and impatience" was related to high defensiveness, and "hard driving" was related to low coping scores. One implication is that TABP may be associated with increased CHD risk only when combined with low coping skills and high defenses. The JAS findings imply that increased coronary risk may be associated with poor coping skills. Future studies should examine multifactorial interaction of personality variables that may contribute to CHD risk.
通过结构化访谈和詹金斯活动调查(JAS)来衡量,对应对方式和防御机制与A型行为模式(TABP)之间的关系进行了研究,以了解TABP的动态变化以及与冠心病(CHD)风险相关的心理因素。研究假设,整体TABP及其组成部分“速度和不耐烦”与防御机制的使用有关,而TABP属性“工作投入”与高应对方式有关。整体TABP的访谈测量结果与应对方式和防御机制无关。对于JAS,“工作投入”与高应对得分和低防御得分有关,“速度和不耐烦”与高防御性有关,“努力进取”与低应对得分有关。一个启示是,只有当TABP与低应对技能和高防御机制相结合时,才可能与冠心病风险增加有关。JAS的研究结果表明,冠心病风险增加可能与应对技能差有关。未来的研究应考察可能导致冠心病风险的人格变量的多因素相互作用。