Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH, USA.
Int Wound J. 2012 Dec;9(6):656-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00935.x. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
Pressure mapping alone insufficiently describes tissue health. Comprehensive, quantitative non invasive assessment is crucial. Interface pressures (IPs) and transcutaneous blood gas levels [transcutaneous tissue oxygen (T(c) PO(2) )] were simultaneously assessed over both ischia and the sacrum to investigate the hypotheses: (i) tissue oxygenation decreases with sustained applied pressure; (ii) tissue oxygen and IP are inversely correlated in loaded soft tissues; (iii) multisite assessments are unnecessary because healthy individuals are symmetrical. Measurements were taken at 5-minute intervals for 20 minutes in both sitting and supine lying for a cohort of 20 able-bodied adults. There were no statistically significant changes over time for either variable in 96% of timepoint comparisons. Specifically, no significant differences were seen between 10 and 20 minutes in either position. These findings imply that a 10-minute assessment can reliably indicate tissue health and that tissue may adapt to applied load over time. No statistically significant correlations between T(c) PO(2) and IP were observed. However, the left and right ischia were significantly different for both variables in supine lying (P < 0.001) and for sitting IP (P < 0.010). Thus, even in this healthy cohort, postural symmetry was not observed and should not be assumed for other populations with restricted mobility. If a multisite technique cannot be used, repeated tissue health assessments must use the same anatomic location.
压力映射本身不足以描述组织健康状况。全面、定量的非侵入性评估至关重要。我们同时评估了坐骨和骶骨上的界面压力(IPs)和经皮血气水平[经皮组织氧(T(c)PO(2))],以验证以下假设:(i)组织氧合随着持续施加的压力而降低;(ii)在负载的软组织中,组织氧和 IP 呈负相关;(iii)多部位评估是不必要的,因为健康个体是对称的。在 20 名健康成年人中,每隔 5 分钟测量 20 分钟,分别在坐姿和仰卧位进行。在 96%的时间点比较中,两个变量都没有随时间发生统计学显著变化。具体来说,在两种体位下,10 分钟和 20 分钟之间没有显著差异。这些发现表明,10 分钟的评估可以可靠地指示组织健康状况,并且组织可能会随着时间的推移适应施加的负荷。T(c)PO(2)和 IP 之间没有观察到统计学显著相关性。然而,在仰卧位时,左、右侧坐骨在两个变量上均存在显著差异(P < 0.001),在坐姿时 IP 也存在显著差异(P < 0.010)。因此,即使在这个健康队列中,也没有观察到姿势对称性,并且不应该假设其他活动受限的人群具有对称性。如果不能使用多部位技术,则必须使用相同的解剖位置进行重复的组织健康评估。