Worsley Peter R, Rebolledo Dan, Webb Sally, Caggiari Silvia, Bader Dan L
Skin Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Skin Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
J Tissue Viability. 2018 Feb;27(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
Individuals with limited mobility can spend prolonged periods in leisure chairs, increasing their risk of developing a seated acquired pressure ulcer. The present study aims to use objective measures of posture and tissue viability to identify the associated risks of leisure chair related pressure ulcers.
Healthy participants (n = 13) were recruited to sit on a leisure chair with either a viscoelastic foam or air cushion. Participants were asked to adopt four different postures for a period of 10 min followed by a 10 min refractory period. Measurements at the leisure chair-participant interface included interface pressure, transcutaneous tissue gas tensions at the ischial tuberosities, accelerometer data collected from the sternum and subjective comfort levels.
Results indicated that interface pressures remained consistent, with peak pressure index values of less than 60 mmHg across all conditions. A proportion of participants exhibited decreased oxygen tensions associated with increased carbon dioxide tensions during one or more test condition. This was particularly prevalent during the right lean posture on the air cushion (46%). In all cases, normal tissue viability was restored during standing. The accelerometer was able to detect significant changes (p < 0.05) in relative trunk angles during slump and right lean when compared to optimal sitting posture.
Commercially available leisure chairs have little evidence to support their pressure relieving properties. This study revealed that a proportion of healthy individuals demonstrated a compromised tissue viability in specific postures. Further research is required to assess the impact of these sitting conditions in vulnerable individuals.
行动不便的人会长时间坐在休闲椅上,这增加了他们发生坐姿性获得性压疮的风险。本研究旨在使用姿势和组织活力的客观测量方法来确定与休闲椅相关的压疮的相关风险。
招募了13名健康参与者,让他们分别坐在配有粘弹性泡沫或气垫的休闲椅上。要求参与者采取四种不同姿势,每种姿势保持10分钟,之后有10分钟的不应期。在休闲椅与参与者的界面处进行的测量包括界面压力、坐骨结节处的经皮组织气体张力、从胸骨收集的加速度计数据以及主观舒适度。
结果表明,界面压力保持一致,在所有条件下峰值压力指数值均小于60 mmHg。一部分参与者在一种或多种测试条件下表现出氧张力降低,同时二氧化碳张力增加。这在气垫上的右侧倾斜姿势期间尤为普遍(46%)。在所有情况下,站立时组织活力恢复正常。与最佳坐姿相比,加速度计能够检测到在弯腰和右侧倾斜期间相对躯干角度的显著变化(p < 0.05)。
市售休闲椅几乎没有证据支持其减压性能。本研究表明,一部分健康个体在特定姿势下表现出组织活力受损。需要进一步研究来评估这些坐姿条件对易患个体的影响。