• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险强制令对药品创新的影响:来自美国的证据。

The impact of health insurance mandates on drug innovation: evidence from the United States.

机构信息

Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City 1550, Philippines.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Apr;14(2):323-44. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0379-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-012-0379-6
PMID:22290504
Abstract

An important health policy issue is the low rate of patient enrollment into clinical trials, which may slow down the process of clinical trials and discourage their supply, leading to delays in innovative life-saving drug treatments reaching the general population. In the US, patients' cost of participating in a clinical trial is considered to be a major barrier to patient enrollment. In order to reduce this barrier, some states in the US have implemented policies requiring health insurers to cover routine care costs for patients enrolled in clinical trials. This paper evaluates empirically how effective these policies were in increasing the supply of clinical trials and speeding up their completion, using data on cancer clinical trials initiated in the US between 2001 and 2007. Our analysis indicates that the policies did not lead to an increased supply in the number of clinical trials conducted in mandate states compared to non-mandate states. However, we find some evidence that once clinical trials are initiated, they are more likely to finish their patient recruitment in a timely manner in mandate states than in non-mandate states. As a result, the overall length to completion was significantly shorter in mandate states than in non-mandate states for cancer clinical trials in certain phases. The findings hint at the possibility that these policies might encourage drug innovation in the long run.

摘要

一个重要的健康政策问题是患者参与临床试验的比率较低,这可能会减缓临床试验的进程,并阻碍其供应,导致创新的救命药物治疗延迟普及到普通人群。在美国,患者参与临床试验的成本被认为是阻碍患者参与的主要因素。为了降低这一障碍,美国的一些州已经实施了政策,要求健康保险公司为参与临床试验的患者支付常规护理费用。本文利用美国 2001 年至 2007 年间启动的癌症临床试验数据,从经验上评估了这些政策在增加临床试验供应和加快完成速度方面的有效性。我们的分析表明,与非授权州相比,授权州的临床试验数量并没有因这些政策而增加。然而,我们发现了一些证据表明,一旦临床试验开始,在授权州完成患者招募的速度比在非授权州更快。因此,对于某些阶段的癌症临床试验,授权州的总体完成时间明显短于非授权州。这些发现表明,这些政策从长远来看可能会鼓励药物创新。

相似文献

1
The impact of health insurance mandates on drug innovation: evidence from the United States.医疗保险强制令对药品创新的影响:来自美国的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Apr;14(2):323-44. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0379-6.
2
Effect of state-mandated insurance coverage on accrual to community cancer clinical trials.州政府强制保险覆盖范围对社区癌症临床试验入组的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):933-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
3
Insurance denials for cancer clinical trial participation after the Affordable Care Act mandate.《平价医疗法案》强制实施后癌症临床试验参与的保险拒赔情况。
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2893-2900. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30689. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
4
More states mandate coverage of clinical trial costs, but does it make a difference?越来越多的州强制要求承担临床试验费用,但这有区别吗?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Sep 3;95(17):1268-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.17.1268.
5
Oral oncolytics: Part 2--legislation targeting cost & access, and other initiatives to reduce costs.口服溶瘤药物:第2部分——针对成本与可及性的立法以及其他降低成本的举措。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2013 Sep;27(9):865-6, 871.
6
Cancer History, Health Insurance Coverage, and Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence and Medication Cost-Coping Strategies in the United States.美国的癌症病史、健康保险覆盖情况以及与费用相关的药物不依从和药物费用应对策略。
Value Health. 2019 Jul;22(7):762-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Should insurance be responsible for the cost of care while a patient is enrolled in a clinical trial?当患者参加临床试验时,保险是否应该承担治疗费用?
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Feb;12(1):153-4. doi: 10.1188/08.CJON.153-154.
8
Effect of the accountable care act of 2010 on clinical trial insurance coverage.2010 年责任医疗组织法案对临床试验保险覆盖范围的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 10;30(5):548-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8190. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
9
Payer coverage for patients enrolled onto clinical trials: making the process easy and transparent for everyone.参与临床试验患者的医保覆盖:让整个流程对每个人都简便且透明。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 May;18(5 Spec No. 2):SP91-7.
10
Tackling Cost: A Prescription for Spending Wisely.应对成本:明智支出的良方。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jun 1;17(6):633. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0030.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative evaluation of the medicine innovation policy in China: based on the PMC-Index model.中国医药创新政策的定量评估:基于 PMC-Index 模型。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 16;12:1403320. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1403320. eCollection 2024.
2
The Relationship between Health Insurance and Pharmaceutical Innovation: An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis.医疗保险与药物创新之间的关系:基于元分析的实证研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 7;11(22):2916. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11222916.
3
Barriers to therapeutic clinical trials enrollment: differences between African-American and white cancer patients identified at the time of eligibility assessment.

本文引用的文献

1
Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care.癌症手术的集中化:对患者获得最佳治疗的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4671-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1715. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
2
A descriptive analysis of state legislation and policy addressing clinical trials participation.关于临床试验参与的州立法和政策的描述性分析。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May;20(2 Suppl):24-39. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0156.
3
The ADVANTAGE seeding trial: a review of internal documents.ADVANTAGE 植入试验:内部文件综述
治疗性临床试验入组障碍:在资格评估时确定的非裔美国人和白人癌症患者之间的差异。
Clin Trials. 2012 Dec;9(6):788-97. doi: 10.1177/1740774512458992. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 19;149(4):251-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-4-200808190-00006.
4
Issues in the registration of clinical trials.临床试验注册中的问题。
JAMA. 2007 May 16;297(19):2112-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.19.2112.
5
Clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine in an era of marginal benefit, bias, and hyperbole.
Circulation. 2005 Nov 15;112(20):3026-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594614.
6
Enrollment of older persons in cancer trials after the medicare reimbursement policy change.医疗保险报销政策变更后老年人参与癌症试验的情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 11;165(13):1514-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.13.1514.
7
Payment of clinical research subjects.临床研究受试者的报酬。
J Clin Invest. 2005 Jul;115(7):1681-7. doi: 10.1172/JCI25694.
8
Cancer trial enrollment after state-mandated reimbursement.国家规定报销后的癌症试验入组情况。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jul 21;96(14):1063-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh193.
9
Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.参与癌症临床试验:基于种族、性别和年龄的差异。
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2720-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2720.
10
Incremental treatment costs in national cancer institute-sponsored clinical trials.美国国立癌症研究所资助的临床试验中的增量治疗成本。
JAMA. 2003 Jun 11;289(22):2970-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2970.