• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A descriptive analysis of state legislation and policy addressing clinical trials participation.关于临床试验参与的州立法和政策的描述性分析。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May;20(2 Suppl):24-39. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0156.
2
Effect of state-mandated insurance coverage on accrual to community cancer clinical trials.州政府强制保险覆盖范围对社区癌症临床试验入组的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):933-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
3
State payer mandates to cover care in US oncology trials: do science and ethics matter?美国肿瘤临床试验中覆盖医疗服务的州支付者强制令:科学和伦理是否重要?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 17;102(6):376-90. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq028. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
4
Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.实用主义作为立法的一种补充方法:填补人类受试者研究中的监管空白。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):15-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160802495614.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
6
Insurance denials for cancer clinical trial participation after the Affordable Care Act mandate.《平价医疗法案》强制实施后癌症临床试验参与的保险拒赔情况。
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2893-2900. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30689. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
7
Analysis of Maryland cancer patient participation in National Cancer Institute-supported cancer treatment clinical trials.马里兰州癌症患者参与美国国立癌症研究所资助的癌症治疗临床试验情况分析。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May;20(2 Suppl):120-34. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0162.
8
Analysis of Maryland cancer patient participation in national cancer institute-supported cancer treatment clinical trials.马里兰州癌症患者参与国立癌症研究所资助的癌症治疗临床试验情况分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 10;26(20):3380-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6027.
9
Finance issue brief: mandated benefits: policy alternatives to mandated benefit legislation: year end report-2003.金融问题简报:法定福利:法定福利立法的政策替代方案:2003年年终报告
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2003 Dec 31:1-10.
10
Health insurance oversight issue brief: mandated benefits: clinical trial coverage requirements: year end report--2004.医疗保险监管问题简报:强制福利:临床试验覆盖要求:2004年年终报告
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2004 Dec 31:1-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Prevalence and Factors Influencing Clinical Trial Awareness in US Adults with Self-Reported Depression and Anxiety.探索美国自我报告患有抑郁症和焦虑症的成年人对临床试验的知晓率及影响因素。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 22;15(6):e40780. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40780. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Clinical trial agreements and insurance policies - role of the EC.临床试验协议与保险政策——伦理委员会的作用
Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):121-122. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_271_21. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Effect of state-mandated insurance coverage on accrual to community cancer clinical trials.州政府强制保险覆盖范围对社区癌症临床试验入组的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):933-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
4
The impact of health insurance mandates on drug innovation: evidence from the United States.医疗保险强制令对药品创新的影响:来自美国的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Apr;14(2):323-44. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0379-6.
5
Clinical trial awareness among racial/ethnic minorities in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic, attitudinal, and knowledge correlates.2007 年 HINTS 中少数族裔对临床试验的认知:社会人口学、态度和知识相关性。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3(0 3):92-101. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.525296.
6
Analysis of Maryland cancer patient participation in National Cancer Institute-supported cancer treatment clinical trials.马里兰州癌症患者参与美国国立癌症研究所资助的癌症治疗临床试验情况分析。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May;20(2 Suppl):120-34. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0162.
7
Analysis of Maryland cancer patient participation in national cancer institute-supported cancer treatment clinical trials.马里兰州癌症患者参与国立癌症研究所资助的癌症治疗临床试验情况分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 10;26(20):3380-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6027.

本文引用的文献

1
StatBite: States that require health plans to cover patient care costs in clinical trials.统计要点:要求健康保险计划涵盖临床试验中患者护理费用的州。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Feb 16;103(4):294. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr039. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
2
Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review.招募代表性不足人群参与癌症临床试验的障碍:一项系统综述。
Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;112(2):228-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23157.
3
Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: gender-, race/ethnicity-, and age-based disparities.参与外科肿瘤学临床试验:基于性别、种族/民族和年龄的差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(12):3328-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9500-y. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
4
Who enrolls onto clinical oncology trials? A radiation Patterns Of Care Study analysis.哪些人会参加临床肿瘤学试验?一项放射治疗模式护理研究分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):1145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.051. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
5
Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials.医疗服务提供者在招募代表性不足人群参与癌症临床试验中的角色。
Cancer. 2007 Feb 1;109(3):465-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22436.
6
African Americans and participation in clinical trials: differences in beliefs and attitudes by gender.非裔美国人与参与临床试验:基于性别的信念和态度差异
Contemp Clin Trials. 2006 Dec;27(6):498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
7
Maryland's Special Populations Network. A model for cancer disparities research, education, and training.马里兰州特殊人群网络。癌症差异研究、教育与培训的典范。
Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8 Suppl):2061-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22158.
8
Medicare reimbursement for clinical trial services: understanding Medicare coverage in establishing a clinical trial budget.医疗保险对临床试验服务的报销:在制定临床试验预算时了解医疗保险覆盖范围。
J Health Law. 2005 Fall;38(4):609-31.
9
Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors.临床试验的招募与参与:社会人口统计学、城乡及医疗保健可及性预测因素
Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
10
Impact of the year 2000 Medicare policy change on older patient enrollment to cancer clinical trials.2000年医疗保险政策变化对老年患者参加癌症临床试验登记情况的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 1;24(1):141-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8928. Epub 2005 Dec 5.

关于临床试验参与的州立法和政策的描述性分析。

A descriptive analysis of state legislation and policy addressing clinical trials participation.

作者信息

Baquet Claudia R, Mishra Shiraz I, Weinberg Armin D

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May;20(2 Suppl):24-39. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0156.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.0.0156
PMID:19711491
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3626735/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This report describes state policy and legislation related to clinical trials participation and Maryland's model to enhance clinical trial availability and participation.

METHODS

Descriptive review of state policy and legislation related to coverage for clinical trials costs based on data from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) State Cancer Legislative Database, the American Cancer Society, and NCI; additionally, discussion of Maryland's comprehensive multilevel clinical trial model comprising policy initiatives, community engagement, research, education, and infrastructure support.

RESULTS

Twenty-four states have mandated clinical trial coverage through specific legislation or agreements since 1994. Covered benefits varied among the states.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides cost and insurance barriers, there is a need to address important patient, physician and researcher, and structural barriers to clinical trial participation. Maryland provides a comprehensive model to address the multi-faceted clinical trial participation determinants as it tracks state and federal policy, documents trial barriers, and conducts community education.

摘要

目标

本报告描述了与临床试验参与相关的州政策和立法,以及马里兰州提高临床试验可及性和参与度的模式。

方法

基于美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)的州癌症立法数据库、美国癌症协会和NCI的数据,对与临床试验费用覆盖相关的州政策和立法进行描述性回顾;此外,还讨论了马里兰州全面的多层次临床试验模式,该模式包括政策倡议、社区参与、研究、教育和基础设施支持。

结果

自1994年以来,有24个州通过特定立法或协议强制要求覆盖临床试验。各州涵盖的福利各不相同。

结论

除了成本和保险障碍外,还需要解决影响临床试验参与的重要患者、医生和研究人员以及结构性障碍。马里兰州提供了一个全面的模式来解决多方面的临床试验参与决定因素,因为它跟踪州和联邦政策、记录试验障碍并开展社区教育。