Knope Matthew L, Forde Samantha E, Fukami Tadashi
Department of Biology, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA.
Front Microbiol. 2012 Jan 9;2:273. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00273. eCollection 2011.
During community assembly, species may accumulate not only by immigration, but also by in situ diversification. Diversification has intrigued biologists because its extent varies even among closely related lineages under similar ecological conditions. Recent research has suggested that some of this puzzling variation may be caused by stochastic differences in the history of immigration (relative timing and order of immigration by founding populations), indicating that immigration and diversification may affect community assembly interactively. However, the conditions under which immigration history affects diversification remain unclear. Here we propose the hypothesis that whether or not immigration history influences the extent of diversification depends on the founding populations' prior evolutionary history, using evidence from a bacterial experiment. To create genotypes with different evolutionary histories, replicate populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens were allowed to adapt to a novel environment for a short or long period of time (approximately 10 or 100 bacterial generations) with or without exploiters (viral parasites). Each evolved genotype was then introduced to a new habitat either before or after a standard competitor genotype. Most genotypes diversified to a greater extent when introduced before, rather than after, the competitor. However, introduction order did not affect the extent of diversification when the evolved genotype had previously adapted to the environment for a long period of time without exploiters. Diversification of these populations was low regardless of introduction order. These results suggest that the importance of immigration history in diversification can be predicted by the immigrants' evolutionary past. The hypothesis proposed here may be generally applicable in both micro- and macro-organisms.
在群落组装过程中,物种的积累不仅可以通过迁入,还可以通过原地多样化实现。多样化现象一直吸引着生物学家,因为即使在相似生态条件下的近缘谱系中,其程度也有所不同。最近的研究表明,这种令人困惑的变异部分可能是由迁入历史(奠基种群迁入的相对时间和顺序)中的随机差异引起的,这表明迁入和多样化可能会相互影响群落组装。然而,迁入历史影响多样化的条件仍不清楚。在此,我们提出一个假设,即迁入历史是否会影响多样化的程度取决于奠基种群先前的进化历史,并提供了一项细菌实验的证据。为了创建具有不同进化历史的基因型,将荧光假单胞菌的重复种群置于有无剥削者(病毒寄生虫)的环境中,使其在短时间或长时间(约10代或100代细菌)内适应新环境。然后,在标准竞争基因型之前或之后,将每种进化后的基因型引入新的栖息地。大多数基因型在竞争基因型之前引入时,多样化程度更高,而在之后引入时则不然。然而,当进化后的基因型先前在没有剥削者的环境中长时间适应时,引入顺序并不影响多样化的程度。无论引入顺序如何,这些种群的多样化程度都很低。这些结果表明,迁入历史在多样化中的重要性可以通过迁入者的进化历史来预测。这里提出的假设可能普遍适用于微生物和宏观生物。