Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Ecology. 2022 Jul;103(7):e3711. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3711. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
Historical contingency has long figured prominently in the conceptual frameworks of evolutionary biology and community ecology. Evolutionary biologists typically consider the effects of chance mutation and historical contingency in driving divergence and convergence of traits in populations, whereas ecologists instead are often interested in the role of historical contingency in community assembly and succession. Although genetic differences among individuals in populations can influence community interactions, variability among populations of the same species has received relatively little attention for its potential role in community assembly and succession. We used a community-level study of experimental evolution in two compositionally different assemblages of protists and rotifers to explore whether initial differences in species abundances among communities attributed to differences in evolutionary history, persisted as species that continued to evolve over time. In each assemblage, we observed significant convergence between two invaded treatments initially differing in evolutionary history over an observation period equal to ~40-80 generations for most species. Nonetheless, community structure failed to converge completely across all invaded treatments within an assemblage to a single structure. This suggests that whereas the species in the assemblage represent a common selective regime, differences in populations reflecting their evolutionary history can produce long-lasting transient alternative community states. In one assemblage, we also observed increasing within-treatment variability among replicate communities over time, suggesting that ecological drift may be another factor contributing to community change. Although subtle, these transient alternative states, in which communities differed in the abundance of interacting species, could nonetheless have important functional consequences, suggesting that the role of evolution in driving these states deserves greater attention.
历史偶然性在进化生物学和群落生态学的概念框架中一直占据着重要地位。进化生物学家通常考虑机会突变和历史偶然性在驱动种群特征的分歧和趋同方面的影响,而生态学家则更关注历史偶然性在群落组装和演替中的作用。尽管种群中个体之间的遗传差异会影响群落相互作用,但同一物种种群之间的变异性因其在群落组装和演替中的潜在作用而受到的关注相对较少。我们使用了两个不同组成的原生动物和轮虫群落的群落水平实验进化研究来探索群落之间最初的物种丰度差异是否归因于进化历史的差异,这些差异是否会随着时间的推移而持续存在,从而影响物种的继续进化。在每个群落中,我们观察到两个入侵处理之间在进化历史上的显著趋同,在大多数物种中,观察期等于约 40-80 代。尽管如此,群落结构并没有在一个群落中的所有入侵处理之间完全趋同到单一结构。这表明,虽然群落中的物种代表了一个共同的选择环境,但反映其进化历史的种群差异可以产生持久的、短暂的替代群落状态。在一个群落中,我们还观察到随着时间的推移,重复群落之间的处理内变异性增加,这表明生态漂移可能是导致群落变化的另一个因素。尽管这些短暂的替代状态很细微,但它们在相互作用物种的丰度上有所不同,可能会产生重要的功能后果,这表明进化在驱动这些状态方面的作用值得更多关注。