Conrad Ralf, Klose Melanie, Lu Yahai, Chidthaisong Amnat
Max-Planck-Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology Marburg, Germany.
Front Microbiol. 2012 Jan 20;3:4. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00004. eCollection 2012.
Addition of straw is common practice in rice agriculture, but its effect on the path of microbial CH(4) production and the microbial community involved is not well known. Since straw from rice (C3 plant) and maize plants (C4 plant) exhibit different δ(13)C values, we compared the effect of these straw types using anoxic rice field soils from Italy and China, and also a soil from Thailand that had previously not been flooded. The temporal patterns of production of CH(4) and its major substrates H(2) and acetate, were slightly different between rice straw and maize straw. Addition of methyl fluoride, an inhibitor of acetoclastic methanogenesis, resulted in partial inhibition of acetate consumption and CH(4) production. The δ(13)C of the accumulated CH(4) and acetate reflected the different δ(13)C values of rice straw versus maize straw. However, the relative contribution of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis to total CH(4) production exhibited a similar temporal change when scaled to CH(4) production irrespectively of whether rice straw or maize straw was applied. The composition of the methanogenic archaeal communities was characterized by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis and was quantified by quantitative PCR targeting archaeal 16S rRNA genes or methanogenic mcrA genes. The size of the methanogenic communities generally increased during incubation with straw, but the straw type had little effect. Instead, differences were found between the soils, with Methanosarcinaceae and Methanobacteriales dominating straw decomposition in Italian soil, Methanosarcinaceae, Methanocellales, and Methanobacteriale in China soil, and Methanosarcinaceae and Methanocellales in Thailand soil. The experiments showed that methanogenic degradation in different soils involved different methanogenic population dynamics. However, the path of CH(4) production was hardly different between degradation of rice straw versus maize straw and was also similar for the different soil types.
添加稻草是水稻种植中的常见做法,但其对微生物甲烷生成途径及相关微生物群落的影响尚不清楚。由于水稻(C3植物)和玉米(C4植物)的稻草具有不同的δ(13)C值,我们使用来自意大利和中国的缺氧稻田土壤以及泰国一种此前未被淹水的土壤,比较了这两种稻草类型的影响。稻草和玉米秸秆在甲烷及其主要底物氢气和乙酸盐产生的时间模式上略有不同。添加氟甲烷(一种乙酸裂解产甲烷的抑制剂)导致乙酸盐消耗和甲烷产生部分受到抑制。积累的甲烷和乙酸盐的δ(13)C反映了稻草与玉米秸秆不同的δ(13)C值。然而,无论施用的是稻草还是玉米秸秆,以甲烷产量为尺度时,氢营养型产甲烷对总甲烷产量的相对贡献呈现出相似的时间变化。通过末端限制性片段长度多态性(T-RFLP)分析对产甲烷古菌群落的组成进行了表征,并通过靶向古菌16S rRNA基因或产甲烷mcrA基因的定量PCR进行了定量。在与稻草一起培养期间,产甲烷群落的大小通常会增加,但稻草类型的影响很小。相反,在不同土壤之间发现了差异,甲烷八叠球菌科和甲烷杆菌目在意大利土壤的稻草分解中占主导地位,甲烷八叠球菌科、甲烷微菌目和甲烷杆菌目在中国土壤中占主导地位,而甲烷八叠球菌科和甲烷微菌目在泰国土壤中占主导地位。实验表明,不同土壤中的产甲烷降解涉及不同的产甲烷种群动态。然而,稻草与玉米秸秆降解之间的甲烷生成途径几乎没有差异,并且不同土壤类型之间也相似。